9/11 Photos, or Lack Thereof..., page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 30-3-2010 @ 11:43 PM by uvikingslost
reply to post by 10DeadInside10



9/ll happened and it's history. I have seen some pictures on the internet of some of the remains of WTC jumpers who hit the concrete. It is not pretty and realistically one can imagine the force in which the jumpers hit the ground. I hope that answers your question.

You just have to look carefully at the sites on the internet because I have seen some of the pictures taken of what you asked.


reply posted on 1-4-2010 @ 06:21 AM by REMISNE
Originally posted by uvikingslost
You just have to look carefully at the sites on the internet because I have seen some of the pictures taken of what you asked.


Problem is that if the photos shown on the sites are actual photos and if they have the proper sources .

There is a protocol that must be followed to show proper photos for evidence.

www.policeone.com...
Investigators should maintain a photographic log as a reference to where and what photos have been taken, as well as the conditions under which the photographs were obtained. A log also helps the photographer present a professional image when testifying in court.

The log should include:

Identity of photographer
Date/time
Location of crime
Type of case
Case number or other identifying number
Orientation, description of the scene
Type of camera/lens used
Type of film used
Light source, type of strobe (manual or automatic, fill)
Shutter speed
Lens aperture - Because photography does have some inherent limitations, always create a crime scene sketch as an addendum to the photographic log.


reply posted on 15-11-2011 @ 07:31 PM by vipertech0596
reply to post by EndlessFire



And less than an inch, is deep enough to cause a fatal injury to the carotid arteries in most people. And enough to scare the hell out of anyone around you.


reply posted on 15-11-2011 @ 08:17 PM by impressme
reply to post by EndlessFire



I completely agree with you and there are a few in here who apparently feel it is their job to enforce the “status quo” of the OS and scoffing and ridiculing anyone who thinks differently, or doesn’t agree with them as we see this demonstrated in most 911 threads.

We are informed that there are no government disinformation groups on ATS, just a few Trolls and we are to ignore them, yet they seem to continue to derail every good 911 thread to the point where most ATS readers or lurkers will not even read the many threads any longer, this is my opinion of courses they did a fine job of discouraging many posters from posting in these 911 forums for fear of personal attacks. You will not have a problem picking them out. But don’t let them intimidate you; most of them do not seem to understand simple logic and lack critical thinking skills of debating 911.
edit on 15-11-2011 by impressme because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-11-2011 @ 08:41 PM by EndlessFire
reply to post by vipertech0596



If it was between getting home to my kids and an even remote chance of surviving vs certain death if I did nothing, I would rush those b8tches in a heartbeat. Tell me you wouldn't do the same. Fight or flight, you gonna tell me everyone on those planes said flight instead of fight?
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags