This topic is in the 9/11 Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


9/11 Photos, or Lack Thereof...


<<  3    4    5    6  >>



reply posted on 1-8-2005 @ 01:39 PM by ashmok



I think we've made our points; there's no use continuing to go in circles.


Fair enough & just what I was about to say, actually. I'm sure everyone else has read enough to decide who they think has made the best case - time to move on.

[edit on 1-8-2005 by ashmok]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-8-2005 @ 02:25 PM by msdos464




This is no explanation whatsoever for why all the concrete in both building was turned into powder. You could expect some dust from the buildings, of course, but every freaking piece of it gone? You're going to have to prove that contention with something other than a hammer.


How do you know that ALL concrete was pulverized? There might have been large concrete pieces in tower remains. I don't know was there or not.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-8-2005 @ 05:30 PM by bsbray11



Originally posted by msdos464


This is no explanation whatsoever for why all the concrete in both building was turned into powder. You could expect some dust from the buildings, of course, but every freaking piece of it gone? You're going to have to prove that contention with something other than a hammer.


How do you know that ALL concrete was pulverized? There might have been large concrete pieces in tower remains. I don't know was there or not.


Check pics of ground zero, or even of the collapse itself, and see if you can find any concrete not in the form of dust. If you can find some, post it. As far as I know, all concrete slabs between floors in those buildings were pulverized into powder. The only potential exemption to this would be in the basement floors, and I don't even know of the material there being intact.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-8-2005 @ 10:54 PM by HowardRoark



Originally posted by bsbray11


My words were "utterly destroy," not simply harm. You're suggesting the utter destruction was not from the collapse, despite the fate of the concrete slabs, which were completely and thoroughly turned to dust during the collapses.




It wasn't all pulverized. The drywall was, certainly, but the floor slabs were only 4" thick and consisted of lightweight concrete.

110 stories, x 4" = 36' 8"

Add to this, the fact that the debris collapsed down into the basement and you will realize that most of the concrete was still there in the "pile."



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-8-2005 @ 12:21 AM by billybob



Originally posted by HowardRoark

Originally posted by bsbray11


My words were "utterly destroy," not simply harm. You're suggesting the utter destruction was not from the collapse, despite the fate of the concrete slabs, which were completely and thoroughly turned to dust during the collapses.




It wasn't all pulverized. The drywall was, certainly, but the floor slabs were only 4" thick and consisted of lightweight concrete.

110 stories, x 4" = 36' 8"

Add to this, the fact that the debris collapsed down into the basement and you will realize that most of the concrete was still there in the "pile."




the "concrete slabs" were actually "concrete and steel slabs". the concrete was poured onto the steel, remember? it can't just end up in a pile of just concrete. unless of course there was some kind of super duper centrifuge caused by the elevator shaft's static pressure, which seperated the concrete from the steel.

how DID the concrete get seperated from the steel? must have been the explosives they poured in with the concrete when the towers were built. something about seawater being used to increase the shelf life of the c4?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-8-2005 @ 10:41 AM by bsbray11



Add to this, the fact that the debris collapsed down into the basement and you will realize that most of the concrete was still there in the "pile."


Anything to verify this?

From the looks of the collapse, I think I know exactly what happened to most, if not all, of the concrete in all of those floors..

external image

I wonder what all that whitish, powdery-looking stuff flying around the steel shards is.

Maybe this..?

external image

external image

external image

That's certainly a very fine powder for concrete.

[edit on 3-8-2005 by bsbray11]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-8-2005 @ 11:30 AM by Conspicuouz


it's so freaking obvious it's scary how people still believe the official story



good post of photos

can anyone claim that fine of dust/concrete/whatever you want to call it came from the whole pancake theory?

come on



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 05:29 AM by Anonymous ATS





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 04:21 PM by Anonymous ATS





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  3    4    5    6  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

(no tags)
















ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.097 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread