Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Jake Fenton
Oh for Christ sake, John titor meant the Civil War will start out as a civil unrest.Then on the 2012 election there will be probably a He/She taking
office at that time. After that there will be a full blown war that involves shooting.
What are you talking about?
There is not one thing in your statement that has anything to do with or said by Titor.
That's the thing about the Titorites, they don't or haven't even read Titor.
Your statement earlier about the electoral votes, etc. is a bunch of nonsense. There is no possible way McCain could win the White House now. Please
read up on how everything works. NOT ONE electorate flipped in 2000. Get real man, I don't know where you got that crap from. Also, again more proof
you haven't read Titor, there is not one place where he says the Civil War stems from the elections. I don't know why you have that in quotes, LOL.
He did say civil unrest will be around the
2004 elections not this one. Also, the 2004 Olympics were supposed to be the last ones. You have not
made one credible argument that Titor really meant 2008 when he said 2004. Just another silly attempt by the Titorites to push back the dates of his
predictions. Next, you guys will be pushing the dates back to 2012, then to 2016, etc.
Will there ever be a point where you guys just come to your senses and end this nonsense?