Originally posted by favouriteslave
Byrd the first pic was identified by a collector interested in the piece as a zoomorphic aligator vessel.

Yeah, but I doubt his interpretation (

however I could be wrong!) It's not stylistically similar to the Diqui pottery I've seen or to
interpretations of crocodillians from that area. The crocodile face is a popular motif on "El Grande Chaman", but that's not a typical zoomorph
piece from the area. That's why I think it was a trade piece that came from somewhere else.
BUT... I can be wrong. I'm no expert. Let us know what the museum has to say, and do check out that one site I mentioned previously.
They're nice little pots -- you don't often find intact ones.