How much nuclear/biological information was in the Iraqi report to cause it to be edited from 12,000 pages to 3,500 pages? If I was one of the other
members of the Security council I would be very suspicious of what is missing. How could they make a decision based on one third of the evidence?
But what does it matter? I was pretetermined that the report would be a precursor to war, regardless of what it contained originally.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.