Weather Channel Founder Advocates Suing Al Gore, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 3-3-2008 @ 07:38 PM by bakednutz
reply to post by Indy



You are right on. MTV is a perfect example. It is called the weather channel for a reason. If the founder of it is speaking out against its programming you know something is not right.



reply posted on 5-3-2008 @ 03:17 PM by bakednutz
reply to post by SlyCM (work)



It is apparent that not many people share your view. Although I do. There are more stars on this than there are posts. Kinda strange. Are people agreeing but afraid to speak out. The founder of the TWC wants this, kinda important, maybe.


reply posted on 14-3-2008 @ 07:34 AM by saint4God
My reasons for saying "it's about time" on this matter has nothing to do with the figureheads involved. If I were to say anything about anyone, I'll say I'm grateful for the founder finding a way to force the debate between scientists. As a scientist myself, I've been educated in college that global warming may or may not be happening. One thing that is certain is in a couple of thousands of years, we should know for sure. The problem with stating Carte Blanc that global warming exists is lack of evidence...which is a common theme in pop science. Here is how you can tell whether something is actually in a scientific study versus pop science. Pop science demands immediate action for which there is no data and explanation to support it. Look at the data, listen for the explanation, look back at the data, ask different scientists, look again at the explanation. If after doing all this there is very very little inconsistency, then chances are there is actual science going on. I wish scientists (who are involved in meterology, it's not my study) and those they work for could have this discussion outside of the courtroom, but if there's no other way...

The case will more than likely not amount to much, but it'll achieve three vital goals:

1.) A recorded scientific discussion on the matter.

2.) Attention to the dichotomy of believers versus non-believers in the faith of Global Warming.

3.) An interest by those watching/reading in learning more about the science.

Scientists aren't always right either. One needs only the drive to learn as much as possible, flexible and open to listen to all sides, and the practice of discerning truth from rhetoric.


[edit on 14-3-2008 by saint4God]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 9 days ago with 175 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 17 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 5 days ago with 134 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 6 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 10 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 7 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 13 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 18 days ago with 73 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies