Prince Charles of Wales will never reign over England (2008-2013)

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 3 2008 @ 10:59 AM
The peace of God to all that belong to the light,
Dear readers,
In this opportunity I am going to refer to the sucession to the British Throne during the following years.

Something is clear from my vissions about this topic, The Prince Charles will never be King, his destination is the abdication after his second marriage be disolved or immediatly before the Queen's death looking for a new engagement and a new life in the exile, like his Grand Uncle Edward VIII.

There are many bad auguries around Charles:

- No monarch with name Charles could reign calmly over England, Charles I was defeated & executed the revolution of Oliver Crownwell on the XVII century and Charles II, his son, couldn't give descendants to the throne, he died a little before another British revolution.

- Diana Princess of Wales, that is a direct descendant of both Charles I and Charles II of England, received personally from her antecesor Wallis , Duchess of Windsor, all the jewels that were given to her by Edward VIII as a special bride present on 1981.

- The incredible coincidence between the lastnames of the respective consorts of Edward VIII ( Walis Sympson ( originally Wallis Spencer when she met the Prince of Wales David)) and Diana Spencer, first wife of Prince Charles.

- Another fatal coincidence between Diana and Wallis was the second bride present that Dodi Alfayed gave to her few days before the accident in which both lost their lives: the Castle in which the Dukes of Windsor lived during their exile in France, that would be their residence in Paris.

- Charles is the only British Prince , with the abdicated Edward VIII, that was invested Prince of Wales in a different place than the old Wales Parliament, both received the investiture at the Caernarvon Castle.

- The so many and fierce protests & terrorist acts of radical groups outside the Caernarvon Castle when Charles was invested by her mother Prince of Wales in 1969.

- The legendery Scone Rock, that supposely assure the English domain over Scotland, that was for centuries located under the British Throne in the Westminster Abbey was returned by Queen Elizabeth to Edimburg due to a national referendum on that country.

- The increased Scottish nationalism finally caused that the Scottish National Party became the majoritarian political force in the Parliament of Edimburg, and its principal goal is to obtain as soon as possible the independence of Scotland from the Great Britain.

The luck of the British Monarchy will lie on the shoulders of Princes William and Harry, since it is possible that also the second in the succession line left his throne or will not be able to ascend to it. In that case Harry, the least imagined successor will be King.

Queen Elizabeth is working so hard to assure that one of her grandsons will continue with the tradition and conserve all the priviledges that she has defended for years against the liberal reformers that want to convert England in a Republic.

Phillipe, Duke of Edimburg will die before the Queen and after his death the figure of Royal Princes will boost enormously in all aspects, with the sponsorship of her Majesty the Queen.

I can see that after the abdication of Charles it is also possible that the Queen decide to transfer all the State reponsabilities to the new Successor being she still alive.

Camilla Parker Bowles will finish her days in solitude, she never will marry again but she will be a very rich lady after her divorce of Charles, although it is possible that she must march, like her exhusband, to the exile. Sad Irony for this couple that forced Princess Diana to look for the same destination in life.

The Scandal of the death of Diana of Wales and Dodi Alfayed will be the breaking point in the political Career of Charles. He never will recover his prestige since the doubts arround the facts occured in Paris on 1997 will prosecute him until his last days. His abdication will be forced also by the protests of the people in the streets after the judgement of Diana death finish.

The figure of Princess Diana will be in the future more brilliant and Mythical than the one of Queen Victoria in her times, she will be considered as a Saint in the future and his dignity and honor completly restored by one of her descendents, she will reign as a mother Queen even dead.

I can see that the Historians of the future even can rename this dinasty after our epoch as Windsor-Spencer . There will not be Mount batten dinasty at all in the History of England.

Thanks for your atention,
Your friend,
The Angel of Lightness

[edit on 3/3/2008 by The angel of light]

posted on Apr, 29 2008 @ 04:08 PM
The Peace of God to all that belong to the light,
Dear readers,

This month of April that is just finishing this week will be remembered by many as the one in which the judge concerning the supposely accidental death of Princess Diana finish with a veredict that blames the chofer of the car of the Alfayed Family and the paparazzi as the principal responsibles of the tragic event.

However, it will be also the time in which Mohamed Alfayed could turn the page of this episode & forget it for ever but he decided instead to continue the legal battle to show that it was not really an accident but a State Crime executed and ordered by the high spheres of the Power in Great Britain, that found Princess Diana & Dodi Alfayed affair & future marriage a so inconvenient business for the stability of the Crown.

Pls check this link to confirm what I am talking about: 0over%20'inquest%20lies'/

So is it really a simple suspicion or speculation the one that moves Mr Alfayed to spend millions of pounds in the search of tracks and witnesses of any detail that can contribute to prove the theory of the Conspiracy?

Are the personal letters of Diana writing that she felt there was an attempt of assasination against her life already planned as a car accident the product of her imagination or paranoic mind?

How about her personal meeting with his Lawyer Lord Mishcon at Kensington Palace in October 1995 when she also commented to him the same fears?

Pls check this link:

Why Paul Burrell, owner of the mentioned letters of Diana, decided to march to the exile in Florida during the Inquest, and refuses to return to England to declare in the process, claiming that his life and personal security was on danger?

Pls check this link:

As you can see my readers, there are many points that are still unclear, and that increase the tension and doubts around these facts.

This Year and the next many new facts are going to emerge about the mystery of this Tragedy but also around the private life of the members of the Royal Family that will tremble the throne & the entire British State.

thanks for your atention,

The Angel of lightness

posted on May, 29 2008 @ 06:57 PM
The Peace of God to all that belong to the light,
Dear Readers,
This is to share with you the reponse to one of my readers that sent me his commentary to my inbox about the possibility that this prediction be accomplished.
Here is his message:
Prince Charles of Wales will reign 1 Tuesday, 20 May 2008 06:36 Renee
Of course he will. The Queen is going to die eventually.

Does the Queen REIGN now? No. Well, yes. But how is the royal family different from any other ruling bloodline on the planet?

There will never be an end to the monarchy of Great Britain.

Here is my response to this commentary:

Prince Charles of Wales will reign , response to your comment, 2 Wednesday, 28 May 2008 00:49 The Angel of lightness

Well, Yes indeed the Queen will die eventually but she can live until 100 years or even more, as her mother.

The Queen could live enough even to assist to the burial of his own elder son, since in the Windsor family it is very well known, that the women live longer than the men. The father of Elizabeth the 2nd, George VI lived less than 57 but his consort Queen Elizabeth lived 102!!

Anyway Prince Charles will be in trouble again since his second marriage is so near to converge to another scandolous divorce, in that case he will return to his previous status of divorced ( already fixed "miracoulously" by the death of Diana) that unvalidate him as a potential monarch.

If Charles return to be divorced, for second time, I think we will need to call the spirit of Edward VIII to ask him what should be his opinion about this "new deal" in the royal family, specially, since he was forced to abdicate for that same reason, among other public humilations given laterly to him and to his wife Wallis Simpson.

It is important to recall that the abdication of 1936 was the actual fact that gave to Elizabeth and her son Charles the chance to be part of the History of the British Monarchy.

if any body can confirm this pls chk:

About the fact that the fact that the Monarchy will remain for ever in Great Britain there is a so old legend that says that it will exist until the day that no more crows still live in the London Tower.

Any way thanks for your comment,
your friend,
The Angel of ligntness

posted on Oct, 28 2011 @ 10:56 AM
reply to post by The angel of light

The Peace of God to all that belong to the LIght,
Dear Readers,

Let me return to this thread that years ago I began, today I need to underline that new events are showiing the rapidly approximation toward the full accomplishment of this prediction.

The decission expressed so recently in Australia, in their trip to that country, to the second inheritor in the line of sucession of the British Throne, the Prince William, from many countries of the Commonwealth to remove the objection that an elder daughter of a monarch can become Queen, even if there are laterly male sons, and also that the members of the royal family married with catholic cannot be banned in the line of sucession, clearly shows that there is a opinion current advancing so fast among the leaders of those nations to create the conditions for the next sucession.

This decission can be seen from two very different points of view, it could be to facilitate the grounding of the rights of His Royal Highness Prince William to arrive sooner to the Throne, if he engenders a girl instead of a boy as first fruit of his marriage, or even to boost the possibilities of Princess Ann to be Queen in the remote possibility that the Commonwealth must affront not one but two abdications to the throne, the one of the hgis Royal Higness Chales Prince of Wales and of his descendents to be Kings.

Although that last possibility seems to be really low probable, anyway it is quite relevant that this decission moves the Royal Princes Ann from the Tenth posiition in the line of sucession toward the Third, while her nephew William remains without descendence.

here it is the note of press:

The decision to remove the ban over the members of the Royalty married with Catholic also can be interpreted from different perspectives, since although seems to favor the interests of Charles to arrive the Throne, Recall that Camila , the Dukeness of Cornwall, is born Roman Catholic, also release again the speculations that Diana, Princess of Wales, secretly tried to convert to the Catholic faith. However the most determinant fact is that Kate Middleton, Dukeness of Cambridge was born Roman Catholic, although she laterly confirmed as Anglican.

Thanks for your attention,

The Angel of Lightness

posted on Dec, 4 2012 @ 06:13 PM
reply to post by The angel of light

The peace of God to all that belong to the light,
Dear Readers,

The happy news about the pregnancy of Princess Kate Middleton, Cambridge Duchess, moves forward with tremendous momentum the line of succession of the throne two steps beyond his Royal Highness Charles, Prince of Wales, that will be grandfather soon, and send toward the kingdom of shadows the possibility for Camilla Parker Bowles, Cornwall Duchess, to be Queen consort of England.

While the rumors ran without control through the halls of Buckingham Palace, of how problematic is at present the relationship of Camilla with not only the Queen but almost all the Windsor family, besides the relatively cooling of her marriage with Charles. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, instead, are showing strong evidence of to have not only a solid union but a lot of future in the sympathy of the British people.

The Arrival of this new member of the Royal family brings to the Windsor family in general, but in particular to Her majesty Queen Elizabeth the 2nd, a lot of hope in the possibility of the continuation of the monarchy along the XXI century.

pls read, Duchess of Cambridge Pregnant

An eventual abdication of Prince Charles, pushed by his marriage with a divorced lady, what is considered a great obstacle to be accepted as a legitimate King in the future, according with the regulations of the Church of England, it is matter of worry for the crown that knows very well that he has jeopardized himself his succession to the Throne, in the precise moment he engaged officially in the same kind of relationship that forced the resignation of King Edward VIII in 1936.

Pls read:

Nevertheless, while Prince William still remained without descendence it was highly unlikely that an abdication might be proceeded due to the need to assure at future the continuation of the dinasty.

Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles remains as the first divorced lady to be engaged with an inheritor of the British Throne since Mrs. Wallis Simpson, Duchess of Windsor, married to David , Prince of Wales immediately he abdicated to the Throne of the British Empire in favor of his brother King Jorge VI, father of Queen Elizabeth the 2nd.

Edward VIII a monarch that abdicated to the Throne due to marriage with a divorced lady

No British Member of the Royalty, still on line of succession to the Throne, had ever divorced or married before Prince Charles, that was divorced of Princess Diane and also married Mrs Parker Bowles, after the
Scandal of the separation of Henry the VIII th of the Queen Catherine of Aragon, fact that boosted the separation of the Church of England from the Catholic Church.

While the Anglican faith considered null the marriage of Henry Tudor with Catherine, in spite to be very well consumed with the birth of Princess Mary, latterly known Mary 1st of England, The Catholic Church still insist that the marriage was perfectly valid and gave full excommunication to the English king not only for his rebellion against the Pope, but for his insistence to commit adultery with his lover Anne Boleyn and four more subsequent sinful unions.

Pls read:

Thanks for your attention,

The Angel of Lightness
edit on 12/4/2012 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)

posted on Jun, 8 2014 @ 03:33 PM
a reply to: The angel of light

The Peace of God to all that belong to the Light,

Dear Readers,

As it use to happen in these cases, the abdication of his Majesty King Juan Carlos of Spain is creating great noise that some media believes is good enough to move a similar event in Great Britain.

I predicted a year before it occurred that Juan Carlos of Spain was going to abdicate, as well as also the already accomplished abdications of Belgium and Nederland's, also when I opened this thread I clearly pointed that Charles of Wales will not arrive to the throne in between 2008-2013.

Now, in the current case concerning England, I am certain that these last events are not going to move a great change in the status quo, I don't feel an abdication is going to occur moved by this momentum of European abdications.

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is planning to remain in the crown until the very last life's breath escapes from her mouth, she is not likely to even consider the possibility to drop from the Throne.

I said this since 6 years ago and I still perceive the same, Prince Charles is not going to follow the case of Prince Felipe of
Spain, he is going to remain waiting in the bench for all the time of this world, perhaps until his own death.

The maximum he can aspire to is to be regent of England in the moment his mother become so old to continue performing the job, and even that position is not assured to him, The Royal Princess Anne is also very likely to be considered for such a task, and Prince William can be perfectly chosen by her grand mother to replace her temporally too.

The Queen being still full in her mental abilities can chose whoever she wants to be the Regent if she feels is required, and possibly there is also a political statement in that sense, that is already written and signed by her in advance, preventing that such a moment arrives.

Here some articles about impressions of the British media that is also endorsing my point of view.

Queen Elizabeth continues her agenda in spite of Spanish King Abdication

Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain is a monarch that is consecrated by God in her throne, she is the principal of the Church of England ( also known in other countries as Episcopalian or Anglican).

The case of King Juan Carlos I of Spain is quite different, since he was not chosen by the grace of God to be King, but by the will of Francisco Franco, and he is not principal of any Church.

Thanks for your attention,

The Angel of Lightness

edit on 6/8/2014 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)

posted on Jun, 8 2014 @ 03:57 PM
a reply to: The angel of light

I've also read another prediction about Prince Charles never becoming the king.

On a personal note... I just don't see him as a leader type person.

I could see his mother training , preparing her grandson, Prince William for the role, but not him.

Also wouldn't he have to divorce Camilla in order to become king?
He's waited for that woman all his life,I don't think he would.

Edit to add: Also, he's 65. They need a young, fresh, and motivated king to take over IMO.

edit on 8/6/2014 by Rainbowresidue because: (no reason given)
edit on 8/6/2014 by Rainbowresidue because: spelling

posted on Jun, 8 2014 @ 04:20 PM
a reply to: Rainbowresidue

When Edward VII wanted to marry her, Wallis Simpson had two living ex-husbands. The Church of England did not allow a divorced person to re-marry if their ex-spouse was still living. As the head of the C of E, the King had to uphold the Church's teachings.

Since that marriage ban no longer exists, marriage to Camilla is not a barrier to Charles assuming the throne.

A point regarding the OP, Wallis Simpson was only ever a Spencer by marriage. She was born Bessie Wallis Warfield and was first married to US Navy officer Win Spencer from 1916 to 1927, followed by Ernest Simpson from 1928 to 1937.

posted on Jun, 12 2014 @ 10:37 PM
a reply to: erwalker

Hi Dear erwalker,

I would want to know more about what are your sources? , since to marry a Divorced person that has committed infidelity while it was married, being still alive or not the ex-husband or ex-wife, what ever might be case, is a sin , and so against a vertebral dogma of the Christian Theology.

I honestly don't know from where do you say that the marriage ban no longer exist? This is not a ban imposed by any religious authority, so It can't be removed by any level of power in the Hierarchy of the Church, it is a dogma well established by Jesus Christ Himself in person.

whatever is clearly stated by Christ is a dogma of faith, like what attains to validity of the sacrament of Marriage, so it can't be changed by nobody after him.

St Luke 16, 18
"Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery, and the man who marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Now, the teaching of Christ is that whoever caused a divorce if marry again is adulterer.

The only one exception that Christ is given works for who was deceived, for the innocent part, the one that respected the marriage vows, not for the one that sinned.

This makes the ex-husband of Camilla Parker innocent of Adultery, but not his ex-wife that was adulterer not occasionally but along practically all the years of her marriage. The same can be said if Princess Diana might be still alive, she perfectly could marry again since she was deceived all the time when marry Charles, she was victim of adultery since the moment she went into the altar, since her husband lied when promised there to respect her as wife.

Therefore, the repudiated woman for adultery ( a form of sexual immorality) , in this case Camilla, remains in her sin after the divorce, because she was who gave the reason, and whoever try to marry her carries also that sin.

St Matthew 5:32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, makes her the victim of adultery, and anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Notice that both quotes of Christ gave an exception for the member of the couple that decides to break due to the adultery of the other, but it doesn't release who has sinned of his or her fault, there is no exception for the second statement, only for the first.

Now, although the Church of England was founded by a King that was clearly an Adulterer, Henry the VIII th, who married various times again being his first wife still alive, Queen Catherine of Aragon, even with a nun ( Jane Seymour) , anyway the Kings of England after him have kept certain norms of behavior along centuries to try to justify their right to be Supreme Governors of the Church.

It is also important to underline that there is no drop of blood of Henry VIII th still in the throne of England, since all his children died without descendants. The Tudors ended their dynasty in just one generation after him. Who ascended to the British throne after them was King James Stuart that was of Scottish Origin, son of Mary Stuart who was of Catholic origin. He tried to rejoin the Church of England with the Roman Catholic one but failed in that purpose due to the opposition of the protestants.

Now, let me repeat again the point: To say that the sin of adultery ends when the ex-husband or ex-wife dies is equivalent to say that the excommunication granted by the Pope against Henry the VIII th for adulterer expired when Queen Catherine died, what is absurd. If you go to Rome and visit the Vatican city you can see that such ex-communication was never removed by any Pope.

This is the reason for which Wallis was not eligible to be Queen Consort, even if she might have just only one divorce and not two in her past, because she was a socialite, she was a courtesan along a lot of years, a lady that caused her divorces. The fact that her ex-husbands were or not alive is not really relevant at all to ban her for the Throne.

The marriage in between Prince Charles and Camilla Parker is a civil union, is not consecrated by the Church at all, the most they got was a benediction of the Archbishop of Canterbury after it, that he granted moved more for charity than for any other reason, since nobody better than him knows that they both are reserved almost surely with that union a place in Hell.

Prince Charles is absolutely alienated of reality if he believes that his marriage with Camilla is well seen at the eyes of God, and clearly this ban him to be Governor of Any church.

Queen Elizabeth seems to be the only one that is aware in that family of how grave morally is what this represents for England, fortunately she still has, at her eighties, her head sane enough to see clearly the magnitude of the fault.

Thanks for your comment,

The Angel of Lightness
edit on 6/12/2014 by The angel of light because: (no reason given)

posted on Jun, 14 2014 @ 11:00 PM
a reply to: The angel of light

The Peace of God to all that belong to the light,
Dear Readers,

Today the 88th birthday of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II was celebrated in London with all the solemnity and splendor of the best years of her long reign.

This celebration is a clear message that the House of Windsor is sending to the world that The Queen is without doubt the person that is in charge of the British Throne and that she does not have any intention to quit at all in the near future.

Thanks for your attention,

The Angel of Lightness

new topics
top topics

log in