The progress of this was explained here, yesterday.
I'm unclear as to why our repeated explanations regarding needed infrastructure upgrades on this wildly-busy free-access website are unsatisfactory
to you.
Member's Vigil for Posts Button, page 1
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
reply posted on 1-3-2008 @ 11:12 AM by Matyas
reply to post by SkepticOverlord
They are not unsatisfactory, I simply had no clue you posted your answer in another thread.
Unless you are addressing the crowd, which has different standards of judgment.
It looked as if the last thread was closed after a short tiff between the mods and some members, completely ignoring MY inquiry.
Perhaps from now on I should read all the threads in Board Business and Questions for an answer whenever I post a question, even if the title is misleading?
edit to add: I still don't know why you don't use the mass U2U feature to avoid my coming here and making myself look like an ass, other than phishing for responses.
Yes, that is all I have to say on the matter for the moment.
[edit on 3/1/2008 by Matyas]
They are not unsatisfactory, I simply had no clue you posted your answer in another thread.
Unless you are addressing the crowd, which has different standards of judgment.
It looked as if the last thread was closed after a short tiff between the mods and some members, completely ignoring MY inquiry.
Perhaps from now on I should read all the threads in Board Business and Questions for an answer whenever I post a question, even if the title is misleading?
edit to add: I still don't know why you don't use the mass U2U feature to avoid my coming here and making myself look like an ass, other than phishing for responses.
Yes, that is all I have to say on the matter for the moment.
[edit on 3/1/2008 by Matyas]
-squeak! squeak! reply posted on 2-3-2008 @ 12:50 AM by Sublime620
reply to post by Matyas
I understand you had a question, but there's no need to talk to him like you're his boss.
It'll do fine if he thinks so. Do you think the owners/staff answer to you?
I understand you had a question, but there's no need to talk to him like you're his boss.
Originally posted by Matyas
[That's the kinda answers I am looking for, straight to the point. It'll do fine for now.
It'll do fine if he thinks so. Do you think the owners/staff answer to you?
reply posted on 2-3-2008 @ 03:02 AM by Matyas
reply to post by Sublime620
Justifiably I expected to catch hell from this. In changing my tone I got the results I needed as opposed to being submissive thereto, or descend again to bread and water replies.
In similar vein neither is SO my boss. We share a common interest, the welfare of the forum. His investment is time and capital. Ours, as in the members as well as my own, is time. Ideally we are supposed to work together as illustrated here.
It occurs to me staff is in burnout, or good portions of it. In my own experience turning up the fire a notch temporarily remedies some symptoms. But then again I am a mouse, or at worse, a rat, so what harm can I be?
Justifiably I expected to catch hell from this. In changing my tone I got the results I needed as opposed to being submissive thereto, or descend again to bread and water replies.
In similar vein neither is SO my boss. We share a common interest, the welfare of the forum. His investment is time and capital. Ours, as in the members as well as my own, is time. Ideally we are supposed to work together as illustrated here.
It occurs to me staff is in burnout, or good portions of it. In my own experience turning up the fire a notch temporarily remedies some symptoms. But then again I am a mouse, or at worse, a rat, so what harm can I be?
Pages: ^^TOP^^
