posted on Feb, 27 2008 @ 06:02 AM
Ignorance- the condition of being uninformed or uneducated, lacking knowledge or information (thankyou wikipedia for the definition)
Why is it that there are so many threads on ATS that are posted with no credible or biased evidence? Isn't the whole idea of ATS to deny ignorance?
Also, why is it that if you do post credible evidence (usually debunking a topic) you are automatically labelled as a disinormation agent? It is
clearly obvious that when a skeptic or debunker does post information that contradicts the thread, it is ignored or written off as a coverup or
In my opinion, the most ignorant users on ATS are not the debunkers and skeptics, but the ones that are posting highly outrageous and unplausible
topics. The biggest offenders of these are chemtrails and the planet-x threads. I have not seen one shred of decent evidence that proves these are
A blurry photograph of something that appears spherical does not constitute the arrival of a planet that has already failed to appear five times in
the past. Zacariah Stitchin is not a credible witness. Unless you are educated to speak Sumerian, do not attempt to translate it. Nasa is not the only
source of space photography and astronomy
Photographic evidence of contrails spreading accorss the sky, does not mean that the goverment is spraying chemicals in the atmosphere. Just because
it was sunny one day and cloudy the next, does not mean the government is spraying chemicals, and weather patterns change.
Sorry to single out these two, but they are the worst offenders and I hope this thread makes sense
What does everyone think about this