It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yahoo news link
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A $100 million lawsuit claiming that NBC prompted the suicide of a former Texas prosecutor who was caught up in its popular sting series "To Catch a Predator" is moving ahead after a ruling by a U.S. federal judge on Tuesday.
Originally posted by ATruGod
So some pedophile killed himself cause he was outted on T.V. anyone who abuses a child should get nothing less than put to death!
[edit on 27-2-2008 by ATruGod]
Originally posted by ATruGod
So all these respectable people who send pictures of thier private parts to someone they think is very young is an acceptable behavior?
Showing up at someones house they think is 12 or 13 with alcohol and condoms is ok?
What a warped sense of right you have....
So some pedophile killed himself cause he was outted on T.V. anyone who abuses a child should get nothing less than put to death!
[edit on 27-2-2008 by ATruGod]
Originally posted by verylowfrequency
Yahoo news link
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A $100 million lawsuit claiming that NBC prompted the suicide of a former Texas prosecutor who was caught up in its popular sting series "To Catch a Predator" is moving ahead after a ruling by a U.S. federal judge on Tuesday.
New York Post
ATS thread prior to the lawsuit
Though this has been going on for awhile it is now proceeding to trial and I hope NBC gets put back in its place for its big brother vigilante show. A corporation hiring vigilante's and putting people in jail for made up thought crimes.
I know this is a touchy subject, but I've watched about a half dozen episodes of this show and all I could think of, this is one step too far. As far as I'm concerned "To Catch a Predator" is just creating something out of nothing in order to sell their product, while in the process destroying lives. I really doubt they have saved any children.
The producers & their comrades are doing things that are probably illegal for police to do, but then police are there waiting until they seemingly have the legal means to step in and make arrests.
If you've seen the show, you'd know that most of the guys they catch couldn't pick up a woman or even a 13-16 year old if there lives depended on it. The ones they catch are mostly weak socially inept people being taken advantage of for the most part, in order that NBC has a show & the local court system has client. Not only that they have teams of people acting as one against each potential target chatting to many different guys online trying to get enough of them to take the bait and thereby break the law and make a show.
This has very little to do with taking bad guys off the street & saving children. Its nothing but BIG Brother gone to the extreme and NBC using its resources to become "BIG BROTHER" - cop, jury, judge & executioner. How dare they - 100 million is not enough.
As far as I'm concerned NBC is the predator not their targets. Nothing illegal ever happened because it is nothing but a script where all the players are above age - thus a real crime never occurred only a thought crime.
How many games, tricks or scenarios are we going to play on people to get them to break the law - so we can indoctrinate them as criminals for the non-existent crimes we persuaded them to perform?
Sure....society has its deviants but that behavior would not exist if the controllers had agendas that matched that of the people and their well being.
Originally posted by GUICE2
reply to post by ATruGod
good job dude....you are the typical argument manipulator. NO ONE said that behavior was acceptable. the point here is that two wrongs dont make a right....but only one wrong is backed by the LAW. HA!
Nothing illegal ever happened because it is nothing but a script where all the players are above age - thus a real crime never occurred only a thought crime.
Originally posted by verylowfrequency
If you've seen the show, you'd know that most of the guys they catch couldn't pick up a woman or even a 13-16 year old if there lives depended on it. The ones they catch are mostly weak socially inept people being taken advantage of for the most part,
Originally posted by GUICE2
I think everyone will agree...this isnt the point.
There are three parts to a crime and only ONE has been met in all of these situations. do you know what entrapment is?
Originally posted by Kr0n0s
I really believe this is entrapment and if it wasnt so obvious that these people are most likely active pedophiles, they make statements like, "I have a problem" then I might have more of a problem with it.
Its also obvious that whoever plays the part of the child online actively pursues an individual, even after being told to go away several times.
This is also evident by statements that are made during the show.
Is it disgusting for the dirtbags to send nude pics to someone that they THINK is a child, yes but are they ACTUALLY doing it? No theyre not, theyre sending a photo to an adult, not a child, so where is the crime?
You know the term "conspiracy to commit ____ "(fill in the blank) is getting WAY over used and abused.
I know of two other activities where there are questionable tactics used to bring charges against someone, buying or wanting to buy an illegal weapon and buying or wanting to buy drugs.
I was just thinking the other day about how the jails are filling up with non violent offenders, it seems like things that you would either get let go for or get a fine or probation for a few years ago is landing people in jail now.
Are people being targeted for an idea now, a thought?
Back to the OP. Im still conflicted. These are obviously scum but I think that theres still a gray area that the cops are getting into here.
The legal definition of entrapment is: A person is 'entrapped' when he is induced or persuaded by law enforcement officers or their agents to commit a crime that he had no previous intent to commit; and the law as a matter of policy forbids conviction in such a case.
However, there is no entrapment where a person is ready and willing to break the law and the Government agents merely provide what appears to be a favorable opportunity for the person to commit the crime. For example, it is not entrapment for a Government agent to pretend to be someone else and to offer, either directly or through an informer or other decoy, to engage in an unlawful transaction with the person. So, a person would not be a victim of entrapment if the person was ready, willing and able to commit the crime charged in the indictment whenever opportunity was afforded, and that Government officers or their agents did no more than offer an opportunity.
Originally posted by Kr0n0s
I really believe this is entrapment
and if it wasnt so obvious that these people are most likely active pedophiles, they make statements like, "I have a problem" then I might have more of a problem with it.
Its also obvious that whoever plays the part of the child online actively pursues an individual, even after being told to go away several times.
This is also evident by statements that are made during the show.
Is it disgusting for the dirtbags to send nude pics to someone that they THINK is a child, yes but are they ACTUALLY doing it? No theyre not, theyre sending a photo to an adult, not a child, so where is the crime?
You know the term "conspiracy to commit ____ "(fill in the blank) is getting WAY over used and abused.
I know of two other activities where there are questionable tactics used to bring charges against someone, buying or wanting to buy an illegal weapon and buying or wanting to buy drugs.
I was just thinking the other day about how the jails are filling up with non violent offenders, it seems like things that you would either get let go for or get a fine or probation for a few years ago is landing people in jail now.
Are people being targeted for an idea now, a thought?
Back to the OP. Im still conflicted. These are obviously scum but I think that theres still a gray area that the cops are getting into here.