It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jim Sparks on the Stephenville Symbols

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 25 2008 @ 04:58 PM
link   
This is Jim Spark's theory behind the Stephenville symbols. For those of you who don't know who Jim Spark is here is his his website. Also if you have time here is a fascinating interview with him and Art some years ago.

Source: Earthfiles

“What stands out the most is that the symbols flashed, and not so much as I recognized them specifically as the symbols I’m familiar with – in some cases sort of similar. But the fact that the symbols flashed is similar to how communication takes place in the galactic neighborhood, so to speak. The technology exists to flash a symbol - say, before a human being – and at the time you might get the whole picture and understand what the symbol means, even if it is equivalent to 50 pages of English text. The symbol content could even be as much as an entire feature movie. Or a symbol will be flashed, presented before you that way, and you’ll absorb the message, but you will begin to understand it only at a later time. So that’s what stood out for me the most – the fact the symbols (in Texas) flashed that way.

When I saw your short video of the symbols, I did not get the meaning at that moment, so I believe the meaning of the symbols will come later.

SO, THE RAPIDITY IN THE CHANGE OF SYMBOLS IS SOMETHING YOU RECOGNIZE FROM YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE?

Yes, the best way for me to explain something like that is if I mentioned a movie to you. If I were to say, for example, Gone With The Wind. Most people have seen that movie. Or if I were to say, Independence Day – your mind is capable of seeing that entire movie in a flash – the emotions behind it, what the movie was about, how it began and how it ended because you sat through an hour or two of watching it at a slow speed, which is how you were receiving the data. The mind is capable of retaining that data in a flash. Non-human intelligent beings in the so-called galactic neighborhood communicate that way. They can flash symbols and you can get the whole meaning of a 2-hour movie, or the full meaning of whatever message they were trying to get across. So, that’s something I saw that was very similar to the Texas symbols.

In Texas, what I find fascinating is the way the symbols are presented. I call it ‘flashed.’ I know that flashing symbols is a method of getting information from E. T. to E. T., or E. T. to human. It’s a fast way of transmitting a tremendous amount of data in a short time and retaining it. So, I definitely see that in Texas, too.



So if these symbols were the flashes of information he is describing and not letters or words per se then who is the intended receiver? What is the message that's stored in there. Does everyone who comes across the image absorb this information and process it unbeknownst to them? Or only if you experience it firsthand? Jim seems to think that (since he wasn't present in Texas for this) that the meaning will come to him later even by just seeing the reproduction of it. Here is Friday night's C2C segment with his conversation with Linda.

I would like to see the message behind these symbols unmasked!




posted on Feb, 25 2008 @ 05:52 PM
link   
The only reason i beleive Jim Sparks is his fluidity of speech with the Art Bell interview, which you would have to have lived his situation to answer each question, bang, bang, bang, in rapid succession and keep the whole story flowing. Its just too well put together...

As far as the flashing symbols, i dont know, i wish we could figure out what they were, i guess we will have to wait for more symbols and some mathematician to decipher them. Could we get that lucky?

Debunkers would say it was a mass hallucination. I wonder why a group of people who do not know each other could have such a sighting. The closer they come, the further they are, really.
Could it be they're not so smart after all?



posted on Feb, 25 2008 @ 07:23 PM
link   
so let me ge tthis straight. these advanced civilizations/races cant create the technology to allow them to communicate with primitive earthlings in a manner we can understand...

yea. when i want my dog to sit or go outside, i write giant symbols on my ceiling, he gets it right away.



posted on Feb, 25 2008 @ 07:28 PM
link   
The long exposure trails of light are being called symbols now? Is a witness saying that they were solid symbols?



posted on Feb, 25 2008 @ 07:32 PM
link   
What symbols? I thought there wasn't any stephenville footage.
I want to see what Jim is talking about.



posted on Feb, 25 2008 @ 07:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by jamesder
The long exposure trails of light are being called symbols now? Is a witness saying that they were solid symbols?


The idea of them being long exposure trails was brought forth here on ATS. Multiple witnesses have stated seeing the symbols appear to the naked eye not drawn out film exposure. You need only listen to that latest C2C interview I linked to find out. This is the first in that series interview.

Universal Mind: This is the website showing some of the symbols.



posted on Feb, 25 2008 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Very interesting.
Who really knows how contact will be made. Maybe this is their style. Its up to us to figure it out, if we can.
Reminds me of the 4th of July sticks the kids play with...the craft move as fast to leave an impression for our sight.
Know its a reach, but who knows?



posted on Jun, 18 2013 @ 03:27 PM
link   
reply to post by merryxmas
 


You'll have to suspend your disbelief for a moment as I attempt to address this post and question. I am a channel, that is, a clairvoyant who is "divinely inspired" and receives messages from sources outside myself.



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join