posted on Feb, 25 2008 @ 06:00 PM
Because of the weaponry not only available, but actually pointed at other countries, and because we have idiots controlling them, itching to let them
go, certain countries should never go to war. These countries are those whom have nuclear weapons.
Should any one of them launch a 'nuke' at another country, others must launch theirs too. It's as simple as that. No country with nukes could
afford to say to themselves: "Well, let's wait and see?" Whilst they are waiting to figure out if they should launch or not, potentially nukes
might be on their way to them. Having nukes gives one the ability, not to win, but to take one's enemy with you to hell!
This 'mutual assurred destruction (MAD) scenario has been the only reason why man is still on the planet doing what he his doing. Yet now, it seems
okay to discuss using small nukes tactically...which is a gross misrepresentation of what nukes are all about. There is nothing tactical about nukes,
except that when a launch has been detected, one get's one's own off before one's country is annihilated. That is the only tactic. Once it begins,
how do you switch it off?
China (or even Iran) is not really an issue, but Kosovo is. It is worrisome because the Serbs will not allow Kosovo peaceful independence, especially
with Russia pledging their support to them. Nato cannot bomb Serbia again without conflicting with Russia. So it becomes a stark choice...allow the
Serbs to do whatever they are going to do regarding Kosovo, or stand up to them, which will mean confronting Russia...and that will turn eventually
into a nuclear issue.
I guess some countries are not ready to bow down to the NWO.