The "Anonymous" Scientology Protest is an NSA/FBI Fishing Expedition, page 7


Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 117 times


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 04:36 AM by anon too
Well, a mod. This should be interesting.
Originally posted by neformore
Some thoughts....


Who watches anonymous?

Noone and everyone. That's the way it works.

If you are "anonymous", why would you admit it? (doesn't the "Fight Club" rule apply? - way to go in not being anonymous if you think about it)

Some stay in their cubby holes, some wear masks, some talk in forums, some post responses, some do other stuff. It's all the same as long as it's towards the goal of taking down the CoS structure. The Fight Club rule only loosely applies to this movement.
The gamespeak and leet reminds me of Warcraft guilds and gamers... Oddly though, that links into this...S. Spies Want to Find Terrorists in World of Warcraft .

I've never been into gaming, so that flew over my head.

Who's next? When does the ideology of anonymous suddenly become wanton splintered DOS attacks by people with a particular beef against an organisation that isn't scientology?

Beats me if there even is a next. If it's justified, I may go along, but if it's just anonfag actions for lulz, I won't.

Just how many "anons" are wannabees who picked up on a bit of info and want to look to be something they aren't?

Again, I have no idea. What I find fascinating is the desire by some to derail this movement. So what if I've never heard of the most commonly used memes. Does that really matter if, after reading both sides, I come to the conclusion that CoS is something that should be exposed, changed and/or stopped?
More importantly the cloak and dagger stuff and to the topic at hand, how many anons are scientologists who only claim to have left the church, and how much disinfo is there beong put about by both groups?

I'm sure no one knows, nor does anon really care as long as the information is getting out there. We prefer that people at least have the info, CoS does not.
It may not be an NSA/FBI sting, but I bet some of it is - as they say -CIA all the way - its in the interests of the federal authorities to let both sides kick the crap out of each other, and no one stirs the pot better than the spooks.

If it is a gov op, which I greatly doubt, they didn't pick a bad target.

[edit on 25-2-2008 by anon too]

[edit on 25-2-2008 by anon too]





[Mod Edit: Quote format - Jak]

[edit on 25/2/08 by JAK]


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 04:41 AM by freight tomsen
Thanks for the stars on my earlier post. I take that as a sign that there are some intelligent people reading this thread. As for Anon, Anon too, Anonymous 12 and the other screen names of our friendly Cointel Pro agent, we don't buy it.

We know the Jack Whitehouse Parsons, the head of the OTO, who designed the Pentagon was best friends with L. Ron Hubbard the Scientology founder. We know what the two triangles with an S symbol of Scientology represents. Two triangles, 3 sides = 33. The 33 degrees of Freemasonry and the 33 vertebrae of the spine. The S is the kundalini Ssssnake energy written about by Yogis, also known as the Sleeping Dragon to the Chinese which weaves like a Snake up the spine.

We also know that your "Anonymous" video went supernova overnight with supposedly millions and millions of views from out of nowhere because you are a government operation. You are not a group of concerned individuals. The worldwide awakening group of concerned individuals couldn't care less about your pathetic religion, but we respect your right to believe that Xenu is coming.

To all you screen names that keep popping up, assuring us that you aren't FBI or Cointel Pro, thanks for the assurance. We are assured that you are being paid handsomely for selling out your country to a corrupt government, that like a high-fiber diet, [Mod Edit] like anonymous rises to the top. We aren't buying your diversions. You're all over ATS and that's why this thread has 80+ flags... not because we give two hoots about Scientology.

So to the anonymous' out there, whether you're being paid to be anonymous, or just giving up your identity/individuality for fun, we think you're all immature for caring about Scientology. And you're bordering on unconstitutionally infringing on a certain group's rights. This kind of moral relativity is just what the NWO needs to selectively enforce its coming laws.





[Mod Edit: Please see
ABOUT ATS: Vulgarity and The Automatic ATS Censors. Thank you - Jak]

[edit on 25/2/08 by JAK]


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 04:48 AM by V Kaminski
reply to post by anon too



Welly in the barnyard muck, nicely done, not whorey or anything... fascinating to watch those who watch the watchers watch. No wonder they "wander-wonder". The "Cadbury secret" is... not secret, never was. 'too - beyond the lulz but of the lulz.

Vic


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 04:56 AM by anon too
Originally posted by V Kaminski
reply to
post by anon too



Welly in the barnyard muck, nicely done, not whorey or anything... fascinating to watch those who watch the watchers watch. No wonder they "wander-wonder". The "Cadbury secret" is... not secret, never was. 'too - beyond the lulz but of the lulz.

Vic


I have to admit, if nothing else, ya'll are fun. (and wtf are you babbling about?)

I can't speak for other anon, it doesn't work that way. I was just stating my opinion of the recent happenings IRL and the posts here.

<-- Sane, rational person who doesn't like the CoS

[edit on 25-2-2008 by anon too]


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 04:59 AM by V Kaminski
reply to post by anon too



Babylon a comin'. This is dread. Anyone watching the views this-thread "spike"? Babelfishing, trawler with a drift net.

Vic


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 05:17 AM by anon too
Originally posted by V Kaminski
reply to
post by anon too



Babylon a comin'. This is dread. Anyone watching the views this-thread "spike"? Babelfishing, trawler with a drift net.

Vic


Epic missing of the point. Do you practice or does it come naturally?

- one internet for you.


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 05:23 AM by V Kaminski
reply to post by anon too



Naturally practised in the practicum and ontology... just keepin' powder-dry newf. "Here" has a while to play out.

Vic


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 05:42 AM by Skyfloating
reply to post by Throbber



This thread alone has had 125 000 views within 24 hours. Scientology is indeed creating a media-hype for itself...in times of dwindling membership.


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 05:44 AM by Throbber
reply to post by Skyfloating



*shakes head in despair*

Don't you guys ever do anything on the hush-hush anymore?

Question: Anyway, what would you do if say, some Agency somewhere decided to do something really bad, like blow up a national monument or something equally dastardly, and then blame it on anonymous?

I mean, if you work independantly of one another, how do you know what one hand is doing if you're watching the other?

[edit on 25-2-2008 by Throbber]


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 05:47 AM by anon too
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to
post by Throbber



This thread alone has had 125 000 views within 24 hours. Scientology is indeed creating a media-hype for itself...in times of dwindling membership.

Nah, CoS likes celebrity media that they can control, not web media.

The more views the merrier. The moar thoughts the merrier. anon has no problem with free speech.


reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 05:48 AM by Throbber
reply to post by another anon



Ah i see, so it wasn't just disillusioned youths with empty threats of violence?

K - well i'm sure you'll forgive me for bringing up the more obvious counter-arguments.

I just don't like the fact that you're basically highlighting the areas of the web that could be problematic for the NSA/FBI/Scientology/WHATEVER.



Allow me to explain my thinking; The goons in washington don't know what to do about the internet*, so what do they do?

Cause something comparable to an anti-culture social wildfire, which will smoke out all the problems so they can be tagged and bagged.




*Obviously, they can't simply unplug everyone, because that would destroy the multi-million dollar advertising industry that has flourished recently because of the amount of people on the net - so what can they do other than to try and control the flow of information?

[edit on 25-2-2008 by Throbber]
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags