Originally posted by mister.old.school
Originally posted by helatrobus
Are you or have you ever had affiliations with the Scientology?
What are those experiences?
Why don't you ever address rebutals?
Can you do so now please? Particularly the ones regarding the criminal history of L R Hubbard and The Churc of Scientology including current crimes
being done which it has not stopped.
Since I have never been associated with the cult, despise it, and have been involved in research against them, the remainder of your questions are
As for "Project Voltar," that is what I was told is the code name of the covert initiative. I had no idea that it denoted a Hubbard connection.
(Code names for covert projects often have some cute or otherwise relevant meaning) If you re-read my opening post, you'll see that the initiative is
two-pronged, intending to achieve collateral damage to the cult via the "Anonymous" actions.
I have no idea how you would assume I may have some involvement with a cult spawned by a hack science fiction writer.
Interesting to note that you have had the very same specious ad hom applied to you as is being applied to me over at OCMB.
I think your speculation is reasonably well founded. Because of the general TRUTH that the activities of the non group referred to by themselves as
"anonymous" have done little if anything to incriminate Scientology but lots to incriminate themselves and those who associate with them, I think
their motives ARE SUSPECT. I am not buying into the apologetics and spin doctoring they engage in, therefore I am being accused of working for the
Alternate speculations could apply as well. For one, anonymous could actually be Scientologists. In fact, if you visit OCMB, you will see that much
of the activity attributed to anonymous in the various media is being spun off as being the handiwork of Scientology itself. Whereas I myself think
that is a "convenient" misdirection, somebody else might believe it, and there is some basis to support that kind of belief.
In any event, please keep posting your thoughts here. Anonymous doesn't like it, and I'd like to find out why they behave as they do. I am having
a hard time understanding how they could launch their initial attack because the CoS wanted YouTube to remove copyrighted material. This shows a
disrespect for one's rights to manage their own creative product. I think the same kind of mindset applies to people who hijack copyrighted music,
which is also illegal. People who create have a right to control their creations according to law, and according to morality.
Anyhoo, in retaliation for Scientology exercizing it's right to control a product it owns, anonymous hit them with a DDoS. Which isn't just bad
news for Scientology, but also bad news for all the computer owners whose private property was used unwittingly. Interesting how they violate other
people's rights to privacy and free speech whilst maintaining their own anonymity- all the while complaining about Scientology's violation of
freedom of speech. Where I come from, controlling one's own property does not equal violation of anybody else's rights to free speech, but I guess
in Anonyland things get redefined as convenient.
I notice various non members of the non group anonymous have had their posts moderated here for being abusive. Nobody with any brains equates
cyberbullying with free speech unless they are apologizing for themselves. In fact, cyberbullying tends to quash free speech as not all people have
the ability to shrug off verbal violence.
I hope everybody pays attention to what is happening on this thread, and visits OCMB regularly to find out the truth about Scientology. If you go
there you will also find out the truth about how easy it is to manipulate folks by appealing to their emotions rather than their common sense.