Originally posted by cormac mac airt
The Oort Cloud is 50,000 AU from our sun. Based on an approximate average of the orbital velocities of the planets in our solar system, 60,000 mph, it would take over 10,000 years to reach our sun. That's one way. What would be bringing it back? Also, if traveling nearly light speed, at 1800 years one way it would be 900 times further out than the diameter of our solar system. Again, what would bring it back? The math doesn't add up.
If I have read this correctly, your maths is seriously cocked up.
Firstly, orbital velocities for planets vary between themselves and one cannot take an average of these and apply it to something utterly different. Comets, for example, are Oort cloud objects, but they reach speeds of 160,000 MPH, or 70.56 Km/s (Hailey's Comet). Almost 2.5 times the speed of Earth. Something falling inwards towards the sun from further out than Hailey's Comet and with a much greater mass would likely be going faster.
So, using these new numbers, one could surmise that something traveling from the Oort Cloud at 50,000 AU at 70 Km/s would take 3397 years, one way, so not even close to your 10,000 year figure.
What would be bringing it back? Whatever interaction exists between heavenly bodies, be it gravitational or electromagnetic. It obviously works for other bodies with elliptical orbits. As long as it doesn't exceed the escape velocity of the Sun, then it will eventually come back.
Your light speed comment is just plain silly. Who said anything about light speed? If it was going that fast, it would exceed the escape velocity of the sun and go off into space.




