Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Originally posted by Frankenchrist
I just cant believe this, in fact I cant believe anything here anymore. nothing ever pans out. nothing. of all the preditctions, from Serpo to drones. NOTHING is ever true. NOTHING. We just live on Earth. and thats it. period.

Yeah, I know how you feel. It sure is disappointing. The only positive thing you can maybe say is that all the tens of thousands of people who have seen UFOs or had other kinds of odd encounters are probably not all mistaken. A few of them have to be right. Unfortunately, they all still add up to basically nothing and none of it ever quite adds up to any kind of good proof... of anything. So you have some kind of phenomenon, but it doesn't lead anywhere.

And on top of it all, you've got a lot of people who absolutely see aliens behind every bush and in every blurry NASA photo, and if you don't see them then you're just a close-minded naysayer. Sick of those idiots.

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Unless you didn't post the entire video, I don't think I missed anything. I watched all 57 seconds of the video. Are you saying the info I posted is wrong? If so, please show me.

If there is something else, why not just post it instead of being cryptic?

Originally posted by jfj123

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Unless you didn't post the entire video, I don't think I missed anything. I watched all 57 seconds of the video. Are you saying the info I posted is wrong? If so, please show me.

If there is something else, why not just post it instead of being cryptic?

Ah, jfj, my friend.

You have encountered a common strategy employed by our friend z...who has, I think, granted me the privelege of being one of the 'two' on his ignore list...a rather smug, and if I may say, off-topic brief post that seems to be teasing. Of course, I tried teasing back, and then I got into trouble...maybe taunting is a better word, than 'teasing'...

But, back to the point...many have convincingly argued the basic fallacy of a mass as large as postulated...varies from one-third the mass of our Sun, the twice the size if Jupiter...lots of theories as to size. Bottom line is, anyone who understands the basics of celestial mechanics, and gravity (Einstein's gravity, just for the sake of argument...seems to have worked for a while, so far, especialy in gravitational lensing of light, effects that have been observed for decades...) knows that a 'rogue' planet ( or brown dwarf, 'failed' star, or supermassive gas giant ), even if it is in an extremely eccentric, 3,600 year orbit, would fundamentaly alter (perturb) the other bodies in the Solar System.

We would not have had a four-billion history of Earth, with all of the various Epochs that have come and gone!

UNLESS!!!! And this is a light bulb moment, ...a 'rogue' mini-system just happens to be sauntering by, or we are hurtling towards one another at thousands....no! MILLIONS of kilometers per hour!? Not that this 'Niburu' has been in a stable 3,600 year orbit for billions of years, but is instead, an interloper, ready to rain destruction!

Sounds like an excellent pitch for the next big BlockBuster Hollywood movie, now that I think about it. Gonna start writing it now....

How much time do I have?

[ did some text corrections, and speling...er, spelling... Had a thought to add, will everyone take some time and look at ArMap's posts? He knows his stuff, and knows how to say it very, very well...]



[edit on 26-2-2008 by weedwhacker]

[more typos...bum left hand, sorry]

[edit on 26-2-2008 by weedwhacker]

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Hi zorgon, I think it is what he says right from the start, until the date 14 aug 1978?

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by jfj123
Uh yes I did. Thanks for asking though

But you missed sooo much....

Ah well lets see if anyone else gets it...

Why dont you just come out and say what it is everyone missed?

Thats a bit suspicious is it not? Maybe if you were more forward in answering peoples queries, they wouldnt be so skeptical of your claims

From what I remember there are 3 times it can be seen, as it passes pluto, as it passes Jupiter, and once it is here, it will be behind our moon.

The Cause of the planets 'Van Allen belts' is the mars size dynamo in the middle of our planet, This is were the 'concentration' of EM radiation is, and this is were the 'arc' would try and jump to, so yes, it would very much hit earth, and as I stated before, this is what causes the 'trenches' and craters we see on earth, mars and the moon, electrical discharge scarring.

Someone stated that they need physical proof? go to the link i provided earlier, this shows that the ENTIRE solar system is heating up and our star is getting brighter, now, with the standard model, this is impossible, the sun should be getting weaker over time... So what is causing this phenomena? I believe it's a huge, highly charged planet hurtling towards us at millions of light years, essentially feeding our solar system alot of energy, which has to be transfered somewhere, as it cannot be 'destroyed', transfered to heat, light and when close enough, discharge.

thanks. EMM

Originally posted by zorgon

NASA Lead astronomer acknowledges the Ancient Nibiru model for Planet X.

I have a few 'issues' with this one, but I will wait to see reactions

Well the immediate reaction is "how can something invented in the 1970s be called 'ancient'

Originally posted by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
The Cause of the planets 'Van Allen belts' is the mars size dynamo in the middle of our planet, This is were the 'concentration' of EM radiation is, and this is were the 'arc' would try and jump to, so yes, it would very much hit earth, and as I stated before, this is what causes the 'trenches' and craters we see on earth, mars and the moon, electrical discharge scarring.
thanks. EMM

Are you saying that the craters and canyons on earth are a result of the Van Allenbelts?

What happened to meteorite hits and tectonic movement?

This is a laughable concept

I'd be very interested in learning how an object that's going to be visible at the distance of Pluto can remain unseen for the rest of its approach with exception of when it passes Jupiter and even more interested in how such occult knowledge is acquired.

There is some sketchy evidence from geological records of a periodic nature to mass extinctions on earth but the period is something like 26 million years and we're roughly in the middle of one of those cycles right now so there's plenty of time to build a bunker

Originally posted by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
The Cause of the planets 'Van Allen belts' is the mars size dynamo in the middle of our planet, This is were the 'concentration' of EM radiation is, and this is were the 'arc' would try and jump to, so yes, it would very much hit earth, and as I stated before, this is what causes the 'trenches' and craters we see on earth, mars and the moon, electrical discharge scarring.

Whoa, this is news to me, I must have been asleep in several of my geology classes. Ever here of plate tectonics and orogenies (mountain building), at least on earth. Can you provide the source/reference to his statement. I know several if not all the geologists at the USGS that would be interested as well as several university professors.

On the moon, it was mostly asteroid impacts. Mars is still under study but I do not recall electrical discharges as the mechanism for surface topography. Most likely wind and water erosion and possibly glaciation.

[edit on 26-2-2008 by geologist]