|
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 12:27 PM by projectvxn
|
  
This kind of crap serves as a keen view into the lives of people in the 1930s and 40s coming out of Europe Russia and China. We are going to be
detained, we are going to be killed or "sanitized" and we are going to be experimented on. No humanity left in humanity is there?
I will die in the process of being taken. If any US institution wants to keep me in a concentration camp than they should expect to lose an agent or
two in the process of bringing me in.
[edit on 23-2-2008 by projectvxn]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 12:30 PM by TroyB
|

If you take this information and add it to the fact the U.S. has just made an agreement with Canada to use their military in case of a civil emergency
(hmmmm) I do think the wheels that were set in motion some time ago, now move faster.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 12:43 PM by PimpyMcgibbins
|
There will be a civil-war because nobody is going to give up and get shackled and carried off easily. No true soldier would attack his own people, let
alone for George Bush. The troops that would be doing bush's martial law dirty work are troops that are fighting for us overseas. If one day he tells
them to attack us or arrest us- I doubt they'd listen to him. Take advantage of your 2nd ammendment rights while you still can...It seems likely that
that's the next thing to go. It never hurts to be prepared.
The future isn't a guarantee in today's world. Its just something we're all hoping happens.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 01:11 PM by jackinthebox
|
Just had to ring in here with a big thanks to the OP for posting this material.
Wake up America!
America is dead, long live America!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 01:25 PM by resistor
|
reply to post by StoneGarden
Well, Russia at least is warning of military action in Kosovo.
news.bbc.co.uk...
reply to post by RickinVa
I very much hope you're right about USA boots being unwilling to act against their people, but then there's the foreign troops to consider.
www.abodia.com...
www.rumormillnews.com...
educate-yourself.org...
As to the American people’s willingness to stand up against our domestic globalist enemies and throw off their shackles, I’m less than optimistic.
Every work day I make my way through a sea of zombified puppets, carrying out their programming. They believe whatever they’re told and do whatever
they’re told to do. The gov tells them that evil is good, darkness is light, ignorance is strength, and slavery is freedom, and their bobble heads
nod in unison with acceptance. Still, only 10% of the population fought and won the revolutionary war, so there remains reason for hope.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 01:26 PM by TrueAmerican
|
Originally posted by loam
I can't help but wonder if such an event were to come to pass, how many Americans would actually support Bush's continuation in office.
Any insight from members?
Well, I think one thing that this article points out, and it is critical: That when it does happen, they will keep it as secretive as possible, so
that again, it is done behind the scenes. Only those in the know will really have a clue as to what is going on. The general public, obese with MSM
trash, will likely just do everything the government says.
What is really scary is the way this has all been done so incrementally, in small steps. If its unraveling is to be done at all nonviolently, it will
probably have to be done in a similar way. I applaud members here that are serious about this and who are contacting their representatives. That is
critical. No no, let me repeat. THAT IS CRITICAL.
It is proven over and over again that enough people start complaining, and they do eventually take notice and do something about it. Congressmen are
too busy taking vacations and buying yachts. You can't expect them to know all the things we do about the global context of executive orders
such as this, and the kind of NWO plans that are in place. Imagine if we had an army of such informed people in Congress. Well that is what we need.
So it is all our jobs to inform them, seeing as they won't take it upon themselves to do so.
After years and years of our wobbly wheels squeaking, demanding grease, they will learn about the plots through time and public exposure. I recently
heard on the radio about a study that's been done pointing out that it only takes about 5% of a group to infect the other 95% into action. Those 5%
are the leaders. That makes each and every one of you a LEADER in exposing these wretched schemes. I would venture that we could be close to reaching
that threshold. With every day that passes, with each message that is written here and elsewhere, we do our part to help bring about the changes we
need.
But on a more solemn note, we are running out of time. That last little fiasco with the B2 loaded with nuclear weapons just shows how serious the NWO
is about inciting wars of unimaginable destruction. That happened back in August! They are moving fast! They sense the public awakening! It could be
that sites like ATS had a large part to do with making people in the military aware of what is going on. We may even have just saved the planet, just
simply because we took the time to inform the military. Remember: just 5%.
We have GOT to turn up the heat. We have GOT to inform Congress, and insist that they not just bow down to executive orders such as this, that seek to
keep people with the proper clearance to view classified content away from the truth. IT IS CRITICAL. Your family's lives depend on it.
Off topic: Sorry, but I had to go to work last night, and came back to see this thread flagged to the top and a bunch of replies. Thank you all so
much. I will try to reply to more in time. But remember I am just a newshound, and can
only do so much. It's important I maintain that role and concentrate on bringing you all news from around the world.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 01:40 PM by XFoxMulderX
|
reply to post by filmmaker45
... Not to mention commanders in the army and gov't who resist such a movement.
I don't believe that a military state will ever be formed in the U.S. People would never tolerate it, and the guy who established the military state
would be forced out in weeks, if not days.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 03:49 PM by TheAvenger
|
I invite all of you you who think Bush/Cheney will somehow "cancel" the Presidential election back to this post on Presidential inauguration day in
January of 2009. Lots of humble pie to be eaten then, methinks.
[edit on 2/23/2008 by TheAvenger]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 04:09 PM by gottago
|

Originally posted by TheAvenger
I invite all of you you who think Bush/Cheney will somehow "cancel" the Presidential election back to this post on Presidential inauguration day in
January of 2009. Lots of humble pie to be eaten then, methinks.
I don't think we'll see canceled elections either, BushCo will exit for a well-deserved rest and the greener pastures of board memberships in
Halliburton and the Carlyle Group, while a new set of pre-vetted sock puppets take the stage.
But that's not the point. The point is that they've put in place the sleeping police state--by coercion of Congress, by fiat, and by decree--and it
can be activated nearly at whim.
They've gutted the Constitution and you yourself, so smugly dismissive, could be tossed into a gulag never to be seen again from the laws already on
the books if they make a determination--wrong or not, tough nuts to you--that you're in any way a threat to the state. And that is already today,
right now.
If you believe in the Constitution you should be asking yourself, Why should I let them do this? And doing so now, instead of the moment when you find
yourself in that position, so you shouldn't be brushing it off so lightly.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 07:44 PM by Justin Oldham
|
There are some people who really do think that it's pointless to resist.
As the country radicalizes, we'll see more and more people making that decision to give up and just take what comes.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 10:29 PM by scrapple
|
Originally posted by TroyB
If you take this information and add it to the fact the U.S. has just made an agreement with Canada to use their military in case of a civil emergency
(hmmmm) I do think the wheels that were set in motion some time ago, now move faster.
Just read that at Reddit. Interesting - if the US didnt have so many troops abroad it wouldn't need Canadian. And why would Canada ever need American
boots incountry - for the Quebec threat???
These strategic doctrines are bull#. There is already overlap, and an understood strategic/geographic realtionship, but does it really need to be
codifed to defend against "civic" unrest? Id gladly join an American/Candian patriot coallition to fight those opposed to
life/liberty/POH/peace/order/GG in any way!
-scrap
Link
www.canada.com...
[edit on 23-2-2008 by scrapple]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 11:58 PM by TheAvenger
|
Originally posted by gottago
I don't think we'll see canceled elections either,
but that's not the point. The point is that they've put in place the sleeping police state--by coercion of Congress, by fiat, and by decree--and it
can be activated nearly at whim.
If you believe in the Constitution you should be asking yourself,
The OPs link specifically mentions Bush and a coup.
If We The People don't like what our elected representatives do, then We The People should replace them by voting against their tenure at every
opportunity.
Again, I invite all who believe there will be no presidential election this year to join me on this thread on Inauguration day in January. We will
then see who is right.
[edit on 2/24/2008 by TheAvenger]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 12:09 AM by Justin Oldham
|
I do find it to be interesting that so many talk about Bush taking over when he's lost his grip on power. The thing to be worried about next is what
the Democrats will do with all that power Bush got for them. No Democrat will give back what Bush stole. If anything, the Dems desire for bigger
government will only result in worse than what Bush has already done.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 12:35 AM by gottago
|
reply to post by TheAvenger
As for the words "Bush" and "coup," those could as well be referring to Florida in 2000. The OP title puts the word "possible" between them.
This is a recurrent scenario and I agree its unlikely, simply because its already been done and the work has been done. And that's the extremely
dangerous and quite real problem.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 06:20 PM by tgambill
|
On the surface what you say is correct. However, the Bilderbergers have it all planned out. They are going to kill millions, crash the dollar, and
prop up a third enemy.................
reply to post by filmmaker45
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 07:34 PM by Nunny
|
reply to post by TrueAmerican
Don't they have homes for people like you? You people amaze me. You are so BLINDED by your hatred for Bush, that you invent stuff up out of thin
air. People, we are more likely to have a coup by Hillary and her gang than Bush. Republicans are about security, personal responsibility, and
empowerment. Democrats are about the government is your father and you can't make it without their help. However, the REAL danger is electing
someone (don't care which party) with no experience and hasn't been battle-tested. You need economic, foreign policy, and executive experience with
a little knowledge about macro-effects of the military to be President. Not a president of Toast-masters.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 07:37 PM by Nunny
|
reply to post by gottago
Idiots; all of you who believe the election was stolen in 2000. I LIVE in Florida. Gore and gang wanted a SELECTIVE recount. Bush wanted a
STATE-WIDE recount. Who was empowering who? 6 recounts showed Bush won them all. 8 national newspapers and media investigated afterward and found
nothing that would have changed the result. But people like you don't like the results, so therefore it must've been stolen. Please, educate
yourself a little...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 07:43 PM by whatukno
|
reply to post by TrueAmerican
Kinda odd that a senator could not read this but I the average American citizen can.
NSPD-51
Might want to read over this directive yourselves everyone.
(e) "Enduring Constitutional Government," or "ECG," means a cooperative effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the
Federal Government, coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial branches and with proper respect
for the constitutional separation of powers among the branches, to preserve the constitutional framework under which the Nation is governed and the
capability of all three branches of government to execute constitutional responsibilities and provide for orderly succession, appropriate transition
of leadership, and interoperability and support of the National Essential Functions during a catastrophic emergency;
Source: www.whitehouse.gov
So check out NSPD-51 for yourselves and let us know where in this it may cripple the US government.
I am just throwing this out there for your edification, I may be wrong but this looks to me to be a national emergency plan and not a precursor to the
violent overthrow of the government in a preemptive strike to make George W Bush the emperor of America.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 12:23 AM by TrueAmerican
|
Originally posted by Nunny
reply to post by TrueAmerican
Don't they have homes for people like you? You people amaze me. You are so BLINDED by your hatred for Bush, that you invent stuff up out of thin
air. People, we are more likely to have a coup by Hillary and her gang than Bush.
Yeah they have homes for people like me. They've already been built in the form of FEMA detention camps. The funny thing is that we're going to end
up putting people like YOU in them. You and all the rest of the blind fools that are letting the NWO incrementally seize power and turn this country
into a Fascist military dictatorship.
Thin air?
Why don't you go visit the link to the ATS thread provided in the OP. You would then know that there was a classified annex to this presidential
directive that was WITHHELD from congressmen who HAD THE SECURITY CLEARANCE TO VIEW IT. Don't come in here with your ignorance and act like I'm a
stupid paranoid Bush hater without a clue. I am doing my reading, so go do yours.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2008 @ 02:40 AM by whatukno
|
reply to post by TrueAmerican
Are you talking about this?
(23) Annex A and the classified Continuity Annexes, attached hereto, are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this directive.
Source: NSPD-51
Even so, does that negate the bulk of NSPD-51 and the articles that are allowed to be viewed by the general public? Also if they are indeed
classified. Wouldn't it be wise for the senator to deny reading them? From what I understand classified material is not allowed to be talked about.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |