reply to post by ZeroDignity
Thanks for sharing you thoughts and allowing me to understand where you are coming from with your previous statement. If you ask me if I think Ronald
Weinland could still be used by God where any amount of truth is concerned, my answer would have to be, no
. He is being used wonderfully for
achieving deception though. Fulfilling Jesus’ own words regarding False Prophets arising in the end time.
As for your, attempting to justify what you believe by your comparisons with Paul, King David, Jacob, Moses, I ask you, what did all of these have in
common? Yes, they were not boastful, self proclaimed
Prophets. I don’t listen to what Mr. Weinland is saying about himself, or, how highly
he regards himself (One of Two Witnesses), what I do listen to is the teaching coming out of his mouth. This is how you judge. If his teaching and
fruit bear anything, it is what he has become, an offshoot of Herbert W. Armstrong, only more delusional
in his self appointed stature.
Like I stated before, if anyone thinks any ounce of truth can produce a false prophet, then they need to back track and realize, error comes via
error, error does not come via truth. An apple tree can not produce a lemon. Only lemons produce lemons and, Weinland’s doctrine (Church of God-PKG)
is the lemon tree and the fruit we see is Weinland, Just as Armstrong’s doctrine (Worldwide Church of God) was a lemon and produced Armstrong.
Weinland’s roots stem from Armstrong and the two, you can not separate, when arriving at sound judgement where doctrine and error are concerned.
Both doctrine’s as well as each man, were and are, steeped in error, hence, this is why we see the boasting that we do with Weinland and have in the
past with Armstrong.