Confirmation & Update on Secret United Nations Meeting Discussing UFOs & Extraterrestrial Life, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 42 times
Topic started on 21-2-2008 @ 10:24 AM by spacevisitor
For those interested in the subject.

Source; Andrew Johnson
www.checktheevidence.co.uk...

Confirmation & Update on Secret United Nations Meeting Discussing UFOs & Extraterrestrial Life
I recently circulated an article
exopolitics.org:80...
describing a secret meeting that allegedly occurred at the New York office of the United Nations discussing UFOs/extraterrestrial life. The confidential source (A) for the meeting is presently working as a member of the diplomatic community who relayed this information to two New York based researchers, Shawn and Clay Pickering. I am pleased to announce that I have received independent confirmation that the alleged meeting did occur on the morning of February 12, 2008 as Clay's and Shawn's source claimed. I was also given information by an independent source (B), who I believe is very reliable, on what transpired at the meeting. It was claimed that a document had been circulated at the meeting, and was now being relayed to key ministries of many nations for further study and comments.


Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.


Mod Edit: Big Quote – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 21-2-2008 by Crakeur]

Sorry.

[edit on 21/2/08 by spacevisitor]


reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 10:25 AM by spacevisitor
Source; Andrew Johnson www.checktheevidence.co.uk...

This email is a follow up of the UN meeting which took place Tuesday 12, 2008 at 8;00AM.
We met our source 7:00PM, Monday, February 18, 2008. Our source stated the following:

1) The meeting went well; however, our source left with a degree of frustration.

2) The meeting covered various topics. The issue of recent UFO sightings was one of many
topics discussed.


Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.



[edit on 21/2/08 by spacevisitor]

Mod Edit: Big Quote – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 21-2-2008 by Crakeur]


reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 10:37 AM by Silenceisall
reply to post by spacevisitor



This is very interesting. What do you know about the reliability of this site? I've visited it a few times, and the owner seems to be a hard-core true believer, along the lines of Greer. To me that means a certain amount of willingness to believe regardless of evidence.

That said, and just based on the information provided, I do not find it far fetched.



reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 10:53 AM by internos
reply to post by spacevisitor



I promise you that i'll sleuth on this one.
In the meantime, please accept star and flag from me


reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 11:33 AM by crudos
reply to post by Grey Basket


From the article about 'confirmation"


I am pleased to announce that I have received independent confirmation that the alleged meeting did occur on the morning of February 12, 2008 as Clay's and Shawn's source claimed. I was also given information by an independent source (B), who I believe is very reliable, on what transpired at the meeting. It was claimed that a document had been circulated at the meeting, and was now being relayed to key ministries of many nations for further study and comments.


fwiw.


reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 11:37 AM by MrdDstrbr
reply to post by Grey Basket



How could anyone provide "proof" if all the participants were thoroughly searched? And things like pens, cell phones, recording devices etc confiscated?


3) Security around the meeting was intense.

4) Everyone was searched. Pens, pins, key chain items were collected and not allowed
in the meeting room. There were multiple security checkpoints. UN security cards
were confiscated upon entering the room.


Conspiracy is the antithesis of Proof....


reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 12:01 PM by spacevisitor
Thank you all so far for your replies.
First of all, I owe you an apologise.
Because I wish I good answer all the questions asks in a small timeframe, but my problem is the English language.
It takes me a lot of time to produce a I hope good reply, so I can’t keep up.
I hope you all have no problem with that.
But I do my best.

Originally posted by Silenceisall
What do you know about the reliability of this site? I've visited it a few times, and the owner seems to be a hard-core true believer, along the lines of Greer. To me that means a certain amount of willingness to believe regardless of evidence.


It is in my opinion a very serious site, and Michael E. Salla and Clay and Shawn Pickering are in my opinion very trustworthy.

Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
As for Salla, he is an expert on analyzing contactee and whistleblower testimony. So, it doesn't surprise me at all that he comes across as a "true believer".


I thinking the same thanks..

Originally posted by Grey Basket
I see "confirmation" in the title, but am I the only one missing it in the articles?

How about some proof? Anything? You want to be kept anonymous, fine, name some people that were there.

I heard the shuttle was supposed to crash yesterday too...And wasn't something supposed to happen first in 2012? Bullcrap.


Well, your answer doesn’t surprise me at all, because everything that has to do with the Ufo or better Extraterrestrial reality is Bullcrap to you.
But that is obviously the reason why I am also one of your many Respected Foes, but try at least to be if possible a bit respectful.



reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 12:06 PM by danx
How about these Pickering brothers? Has anyone looked into them?

Honestly I hadn't heard about them before so I searched and found
this video on youtube, with them being interviewed and talking about general conspiracies but UFOs in particular. In the video they take Dan Burisch's claims as fact, among other things that made me a little suspicious.

So I'm not really sure what to think or expect of this, but as of now without any other (real) confirmation or corroboration I'm leaning towards a fabricated story.


reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 12:27 PM by MrdDstrbr
reply to post by dave420



Anecdotal evidence counts as evidence. Proof, no, but evidence, yes.

Our courts of law accept anecdotal evidence, therefore, I feel, so must we....


reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 12:55 PM by izopen
reply to post by Silenceisall



Are you referring to me (Andrew Johnson) or Michael Salla. if you'd checked more carefully, you could've attributed the post to the correct person - Michael Salla.

Now, when it comes to actual evidence of ET (or non-human) involvement in Human Affairs, it's all over the place. Gordon Cooper's filmed landing in 1955, Mars Data, Starchild Skull etc etc. So, why not separate evidence from the "stories of meetings" discussing these matters, which whilst worth noting and analysing, aren't themselves primary evidence. Do you agree?

[edit on 21-2-2008 by izopen]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO Filmed From Avebury Crop Circle, UK With Multiple Witnesses
  Posted 19 days ago with 89 member flags
The Men In Black(OPs) The Aviary & UFOs
  Posted 12 days ago with 83 member flags
Did a RAF Tornado crash during a UFO intercept mission in 1997?
  Posted 14 days ago with 39 member flags
What is this comming out of our star?
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags
Huge Unknown Objects orbiting the Sun for months...?
  Posted 8 days ago with 29 member flags
The CIA and the UFO Mythos
  Posted 16 days ago with 26 member flags
UFO Reporting for the 21st Century!
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

My rant about my country.... England
  Rant: 7 hours ago, 42 replies
PROOF 9/11/01 was an inside job
  9/11 Conspiracies: 16 hours ago, 35 replies
I have a new Kitten....
  General Chit Chat: 16 hours ago, 26 replies