The survival of culture (and vice versa), page 1/
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 21-2-2008 @ 12:14 AM by dr_strangecraft
In the event of situation X, our culture will immediately begin to change from what we have known. The more profound the change, the more severe the distortion. Just think about how different the US became after 9-11. Now imagine what a death toll of 30 million would do, instead of a "mere" 3 thousand. Here are some opening thoughts:


A) The death of popular music

If gasoline and electricity are no longer available, then there's suddenly no car stereos and no MP3 or CD players after the batteries disappear. Even rechargeable batteries will become useless. And not even one home in a thousand has a solar recharger for handheld batteries.

So, how would this change us? If you're under 40, you live with music as a constant background; in stores, in your car, at work and home. Suddenly, the silence would be overwhelming. Playing loud music would advertize the fact that you have power, and bring the human predators running.

And American (and I bet Canadian, AUS, UK, Euro) culture has changed. The vast majority of people no longer produce music. Young people don't generally learn to play an instrument. If they do in the US, it's usually a marching-band instrument, or electronic, like a guitar or keyboard. It's sort of weird to sit around a campfire and listen to one person play a trombone or snare drum. How many people do you know that can play a harmonica? That will be the music of the apocalypse, the music of the frontier: harmonicas, jewharps, the spoons. maybe maracas. We definitely won't be the same without the old music. How will you explain that video killed the radio star, to a kid who grows up thinking that radios must have been a form of magic?



B) The death of the written word.

Young people today are no longer taught penmanship. They also don't read anything longer than a wikipedia article. It's a fact of popular culture. So what will it be like when the lights go out?

For one thing, with no more publishing industry, there will be MUCH less to read. A lot of posters on the survival board talk about libraries. But the factual books will be quickly stolen. And even those books need to be maintained. Most of them are on acidic paper. They'll deteriorate quickly when carried in a backpack and exposed to the smoke of campfires. How many books will be used as fuel, or toilet paper?

Loose-leaf paper will be used initially as KINDLING, I predict. So, with no paper industry, there will quickly be a dearth of anything to write on. Not to mention a lack of things to write with. Ballpoint pens dry up in a year or two; how many of you know how to make your own ink?

The march of knowledge will grind to a halt, and then begin a quick slide backward. Sure, there will still be medical textbooks. But medical students benefit from instructors---they don't do as well being self-taught and self-paced. With no labs, no exams and no implements, things like the human genome project will recede into myth and finally into oblivion.

And that's just the tip of the ice-berg. Every doctor will instantly become a general practicioner, whether he's a brain surgeon or a podiatrist. Specialization, and lab work, will go out the window. Their understudies, their replacements, will grow up in a world that not only lacks the internet, but lacks libraries, operating rooms, even disposable sterile pads and hypodermic needles---the old glass ones are gone, and the new ones are all single shot devices. So no more syringes.

And without the FDA and AMA, quacks will proliferate. With no oversight, "doctor" will mean a shaman or voodoo priest who claims to have "antibiotic" to sell you. Aromatherapy will vie with germ theory as an explanation for the spread of dysentery.

Scholars after the Fall won't be seeking degrees in business or the humanities; they'll be looking for an education in brewing beer and making gunpowder. Anything without an instant "real world application" will be ignored. The problem is, without all the arts and humanities, the other stuff quickly falls to pieces as well. Medical terms only make sense if you know some latin. who will be teaching latin grammar around the campfire?


Pleasant dreams.

.

[edit on 21-2-2008 by dr_strangecraft]


reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 12:20 AM by biggie smalls
reply to post by dr_strangecraft



Interesting thoughts.

Popular music may die, but music will never be exhausted as long as we are around.

We are musical beings. It is in our blood so to speak.

From the earliest age, I can remember tapping my foot to a good beat and drumming on the table.

We love music. We will not give it up.

I foresee a lot of terrible band being created once the mainstream is done, but that's another story altogether .

I would tend to disagree that written word would die as well.

Paper can be made from numerous sources and does not need a manufacturing plant.

A lot of people write in a daily journal or diary.

This will not change.

Instead of being reflections on the day, all sorts of things will be utilized in such a notebook.

I have a stockpile of notebooks, but not for a 'situation x.' Its merely so I don't have to go to the store so often .

However, if I wanted to, I could make my own paper out of wood pulp, hemp pulp, and many other things.

Heck we could even use our t-shirts as a form of paper. Cotton is a great thing to write on with the right materials.

As for our writing utensils, well there's always charcoal .

I disagree, writing and music will not die (popular maybe, but not on a personal level).

Our culture will move on, albeit in an altered form.

Remember before paper we carved in rocks and passed on history through oral traditions.

Those camp fire stories usually aren't written down, right ?



Great topic dr strangecraft, don't get me wrong. I just don't happen to agree with you.

You got my juices flowing though. Thanks.


reply posted on 21-2-2008 @ 12:33 AM by biggie smalls
reply to post by dr_strangecraft



Amen brother. Great points.

Its going to be a rough lot of people who do survive a "sit x" in the first place so I imagine they'll be able to make paper and writing utensils.

See ya on the other side.


reply posted on 24-2-2008 @ 10:46 PM by dr_strangecraft
reply to post by disgustedbyhumanity



You might be right.

On the other hand, ALL of our scientific progress since about 1980 is dependent upon economies of scale.

Think about a CD-ROM. Could you and some kids with no formal education create one? Well, you'd need a computer, so after 50 years, you'll have to re-invent transistors, that require rare-earth elements like Molybdenum. There are only 5 mines worldwide that produce industrial amounts of moly. So you'll need access to china or south africa. you'll need advanced petroleum and aluminum technologies. In fact, you'll need to build an entire computer before you're ready to fiddle with a CD-ROM.

Now, the CONCEPT of laser-writing a magnetic or optical surface has been around since the 1970's. But it only became reality when it could be financed by the international music industry---again, an economy of scale. Same with computers, same with lasers and all the rest of the technologies involved. You need millions of consumers, to fund the research. A nation, even a group of nations with severely depleted populations and resources will not be in a position to erect that kind of economy out of nothing---it took our whole civilization at least 50 years to do it, and that was with abundand resources, which have now been mined and spread throughout the earth's junkyards.

Maybe we could do that, given the political stability we've seen over the last 50 years. But I'm confident, or perhaps I'm pessimistic, that if we have a global economic collapse, that we won't see anything like real political stability for a long, long time.

Affluence is a requirement for innovation. And we are talking about the end of affluence.

.


reply posted on 8-3-2008 @ 10:16 AM by crgintx
reply to post by dr_strangecraft



In response to the death of what is now called popular music: if it's the crap that the recording industry puts out these days, how quickly can we kill it? Notice the wording, recording and not music industry. Music is an art and as long as people can bang on something hollow and sing, music will never die.

Believe it or not, there are more unpublished novels now than has ever been written in the entire history of the printed word. I've a friend whose published 3 books who can't get one or more of his books published because his publisher says they wont' make enough money on them. I don't believe for a second that he's the only author facing this dilemma. There are probably at least 100,000 frustrated authors in the US alone much less the rest of the world. Kids especially teenagers of either sex have always longed for escape from the drudgery of a mundane life and will gobble up the written word if their idiot boxes are taken away from them. Paper while difficult to make, doesn't require a great deal of 19th century technology to mass produce and it will be produced enough for folks to read fiction and non fiction alike.

I doubt that humanity will slip into a technological dark age but I believe we're heading for a rough spot of several decades as those who would wish to and think they can control humanity become more desperate as more folks become aware of them and their nefarious misdeeds. EL Bore and Co. are going to never wish they'd never invented the internet.

Praise, Bob!


reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 01:59 AM by BlackOps719
Great thread, I wonder about this type of thing quite often.


Music would remain, it has been a staple for generations that existed long before electricity and DAT recorders. From the tribal sounds of jungle rhythms to the old Irish folk music all the way to Appalaichian bluegrass, people have been making acoustic music for a long while. To me it is the most honest and sincere music that can be found. Old blues music played during the depression era, nothing but six strings, a glass beer bottle and a harmonica. Not to mention classical genius like Beethoven or Bach, all written well before electricity and modern engineering. I would welcome it's return.



Culture and the written word, again, been around an awfully long time. Socrates, Shakespear, Joyce, Dostoevsky, Sun Tzu, all of the truly great works were written long before modernized societies. Many of these people worked during heated political and dangerous times of lawlessness. Hardship rarely ever prohibits the creative mind from creating. Quite the opposite, turbulent and difficult times often are what inspire great minds to place pen to paper.


One thing that I believe a meltdown of modernized life would do, it would force people to use their brains again. By necessity it would challenge men to produce their own food and shelter, it would force humans to learn to adapt and overcome. Our society is severely lacking in real world survival and production skills. People these days are not useful, they are removed from our fathers and grandfathers generations in the sense that most do not know what it is like to struggle. In America most have no idea what it feels like to go to bed on an empty stomach.

Western society and easy living have spoiled us to our deaths. Most wouldn't know how to fend for themselves and couldn't if their lives depended on it (which it will). People these days dont know how to build things, create furniture by hand, they dont know how to plant and harvest their own food. Fortunately I grew up in the country and I know how to fish, how to hunt and trap, I know how to find clean drinking water and how to grow vegetables under makeshift conditions. Im no John Rambo, but I could probably make it better than most

City dwellers will be the most exposed because most dont know how to survive on their own, and when anarchy hits they will be surrounded by millions of other hungry and angry people who are just as helpless as they are. In that scenario you have strong feeding off of the weak. In this day and age you could not pay me to live in a place like NYC. I left Los Angeles for this very reason. The potential for insanity and bloodshed is epic in size. If a disaster even the size of Katrina were to hit L.A. the bodies would be piled ceiling high. Over six million people with no food or running water. Think about it.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



What Plants Vs. Zombies Game Taught Me....
  Posted 6 days ago with 57 member flags
Do you have a supply of ramen noodles in your prep stores?
  Posted 15 days ago with 48 member flags
For the love of God, Buy yourself a can opener!!! NOW
  Posted 10 days ago with 24 member flags
Pennies & Nickels
  Posted 15 days ago with 17 member flags
Who Here Is CPR Certified?
  Posted 5 days ago with 11 member flags
So I get a text from FEMA today...
  Posted 3 days ago with 9 member flags