posted on Feb, 22 2008 @ 01:06 AM
This is definitely fishing for evidence to support 9-11 Conspiracy theorists. When 9-11 occured I lived near the Pentagon, and I happen to know many
who worked there. I know from personal acquaintences that a passenger flight did indeed strike the Pentagon as stated. One of those I know was an Air
Force Officer who happened to be in the parking lot when he witnessed the attack. He had a clear line of visibility, and obviously an expertise that
revolved around aerial craft. I was getting reports from him minutes after the attack took place, and the accounts as stated by the general media are
First and foremost this was no missile, that garbage needs to be tossed for the most obvious of evidence. Light poles on I-395, Washington Blvd, and
Rt. 110 were knocked over by the 757, and a missile does not bounce off of objects then hit its target. Second I witnessed the damage myself, and it
was larger than a missile attack.
Third, the damage present was also larger than what a fighter jet would leave, as some have speculated. A fighter jet would also not run into light
poles and other objects.
I saw the damage firsthand not even a day after the attacks, and it was a giant gaping hole, with the sorrounding area charred black by an intense
fire. Most fail to ever grasp or realize the truly immense nature of the Pentagon structure. It is a huge building with a height of around 77 feet,
this 757 only had a height of around 30-35 feet (discounting the landing gear which would matter little, and snap off in such an intense crash). That
hole was completely on par with a 757 sized passenger jet, and I have no doubt that such a jet did in fact impact the Westside of the structure.
Some question the FBI for not releasing the full footage of all security cameras in relation to the attacks. The one thing none of you should forget
is that the FBI is first and foremost an investigative agency. Part of their responsibility lies with the obtaining and maintaining of evidence in
relation to criminal cases. During any active cases, and sometimes even with closed cases, crucial evidence is regularly kept sealed. There are many
reasons for sealed evidence, but for the most part it has to do with the all to common problem of tainting it. If any future cases are brought forth
where the prosecution finds a need to rely on a particular piece of evidence, they must be certain that the evidence has not been compromised in any
way, shape, or form. Allowing for 100% of the Security Camera footage from 9-11 to be made public would take away all leverage investigators would
have against suspects and defendants. Everyone would have complete knowledge of exactly how the aircraft made its approach, and imagine how many
"Witnesses" we would have attempting to testify? The true witnesses of that day represent crucial evidence, and in allowing the tapes to become full
public knowledge would seriously compromise their validity in the court room.
I understand that many of you had no firsthand experience with the attacks that occured that day, and thus you are entitled to various opinions.
However, for me to hear such theories when in reality I saw the damage firsthand, and my trusted acquaintences witnessed the attack as it took place,
leaves me feeling frustrated, insulted, and absolutely dismayed. I have no sworn testimony to provide you, no smoking gun footage, and no photographs,
but I myself do know what occured, and if sharing my account of that day even provided a little more insight into what actually took place, then that
is all for the better.
[edit on 2-22-2008 by TheAgentNineteen]