It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by miguelbmx
reply to post by _Phoenix_
i will try this tonight to see if i get those results. but i do see "shadow people" at work all the time and they look similar: i think im insane lol.
Originally posted by AlliterationAshley
Hmmm a lot of people in here have stated it's a fake but have been unable, or unwilling, to reproduce the results.
[edit on 19-3-2008 by AlliterationAshley]
Originally posted by AlliterationAshley
reply to post by Neiby
I didn't say there was anything supernatural going on here. What I find discommodious is the amount of people that chime in on it being an obvious fake without any regards to the OP. If it's so obviously a fake, the results shouldn't be that difficult and time consuming to reproduce.
It's not a hard concept to understand really. If you are going to call someone a fake with only conjuncture and your own opinion to back up your claims, you're a coward. It's a put up or shut up situation, either reproduce the picture or stop spamming the thread calling it a fake. Not directed towards you, but in general.
I'd also like to know exactly how a camera phone picture becomes double exposed, for the people saying that is what happened to this photo.
Originally posted by polomontana
This thread speaks volumes to why many skeptics are not truth seekers but they are trying to protect their pr-existing belief system.
If a picture or video of a U.F.O. or paranormal event looks good then it's fake or too good to be true.
With this standard you are not seeking the truth but you are placating a belief that you already hold.
Just because you can duplicate something means nothing especially in this day and age.
Originally posted by Neiby
Originally posted by polomontana
This thread speaks volumes to why many skeptics are not truth seekers but they are trying to protect their pr-existing belief system.
If a picture or video of a U.F.O. or paranormal event looks good then it's fake or too good to be true.
With this standard you are not seeking the truth but you are placating a belief that you already hold.
Just because you can duplicate something means nothing especially in this day and age.
This is just Occam's Razor at work. If someone claims that any particular thing or event is paranormal in nature, yet there are ample natural explanations that are more likely and more feasible, I'm siding with the natural explanations. We can only proceed to the supernatural explanations once we've eliminated the natural explanations.