Willie Nelson: Impeach Bush, "Throw The Bastards Out" , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times
Topic started on 19-2-2008 @ 07:11 PM by Leo Strauss

Willie Nelson: Impeach Bush, "Throw The Bastards Out"


www.infowars.com
The star also re-iterated a warning made during his last appearance on the show, that the Bush administration could potentially stage an event to postpone or cancel the presidential election.

"It could be anything and anything will work because they have everyone scared to death, I just think there are people out there who will do anything to stay in power, anything to keep what they have, they’ve already proven they’ll do anything to keep it," he said.

Reacting to the big response his last appearance on The Alex Jones Show generated, Nelson said "I think it would take courage not to say something, I usually say what I think and it’s harder for me to shut up."

"I don’t have the ability to remain quiet when all this stuff is going on all around us," he added.

Nelson clarified his previous comments about Building 7 after the news media attempted to skew his words and claim he said that no planes hit the WTC on 9/11. Nelson made it clear he was talking about WTC 7, which imploded symmetrically within seven seconds on the late afternoon of 9/11 despite the fact that it was only hit by minimal debris from the falling towers and not a commercial airliner.

"I was talking about the third building that nothing hit and yet it fell as if it was hit the same way, all three buildings fell the same way, but the third building wasn’t hit by anything," said the country music star.

(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 19-2-2008 @ 07:16 PM by Smugallo
Hehe hats off to old Willie!

Give 'em hell!



reply posted on 19-2-2008 @ 08:02 PM by Leo Strauss
I don't believe Bush will manufacture an event in order to institute martial law.

However, Willie does have a point... the FEMA camps are in place. The constitution has been amended to allow warrantless wiretapping aka domestic surveillance. Habeas Corpus has been suspended...you can be held without charges!

From Wiki:

In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill that grants the President the right to commandeer federal or state National Guard Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR), contains a provision (Section 1076) that allows the President to



“...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States..., where the President determines that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy...”




Our government has employed a large number of mercinary forces along with a large number of foreign recruits...

In other words it is all in place.

My take is that this a veiled threat against dissent or digging too deep into things that don't concern ordinary citizens...like who is really reponsible for 9/11.

After all if they are crazy enough to launch a false flag attack wouldn't it make sense that they would not hesitate to declare martial law.

But like I said I don't think this will be employed any time soon.


reply posted on 19-2-2008 @ 08:55 PM by GradyPhilpott
reply to post by Agit8dChop



Evidence?

Do you have evidence?

Evidence is the hallmark of American justice.

My patriotism isn't blind.

In order to be patriotism, loyalty must be based on reason.

But, you don't know me.

You have no idea of where I've been or what I've seen or what I've endured, so your accusation against me is as vacuous as your accusations against the administration.



reply posted on 19-2-2008 @ 10:15 PM by Agit8dChop
For starters, I didnt insult you.
I simply told you to take of the blind patriotism glasses for a second.
Your answer the question is the perfect political response. I swear some people on here DO ACTUALLY recieve benefits from the government to parrot the 'politically correct lines'


''The president's decision was based on existing intelligence from agencies around the world. ''

NO, The UNITEDSTATES started this charade, and put forward its evidence to othernations.
And rightly so, just becasue the United Kingdom stood tall and said the same BS Crap America did, doesnt mean they were correct in their assumptions. It just means they were both trying to 'trick' the world for alterior motives.
Or havent you read todays news?
www.smh.com.au...

THE British Government faces fresh accusations of spin in the Iraq war after releasing the first draft of the notorious dossier that it used to justify the invasion.

In its final form in 2002, the "dodgy dossier" made the unsubstantiated claim that Saddam Hussein could launch weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes. The BBC later accused a Government media adviser of inventing the claim.

The Government released the draft on Monday after a three-year freedom of information campaign by opposition MPs.


It doesnt take 3 years to release a document if your not trying your hardest to HIDE it.
Seems the British are now going to be under serious scrutiny, because the evidence YOU suggest was prodided to the united states, was nothing but flulffed up BOLLUCKS.

how about Australia?

We did nothing but parrot the official wmd line, we were definately in your TOP 4 of supporting nations.
so ask, what possible evidence cuold we have of Iraq WMD's?
We dont even have spies for crying out loud, let alone sattelites and military men on the ground in 2001.
Bush parroted the same crap to Howard, and Howard said it to us.
We didnt not offer you anything, neither did Britain.

''Congress assessed the same evidence and arrived at the same conclusion as the president and approved the invasion.
''

The same congress that allows wiretapping?
Or the balls up of Valerie PLame?
How about the blocking of impeachment?
Or that allowing of all of Bushs Laws?
How about Majority of congress being chums WITH THE President and his co-erts.

Nah, we can just ignore that.
Because the political answer is only meatn to be heard and swallowed, not investigated.

''An alliance of nations examined the same information and took part in the invasion. ''

See above,
Australia did nothing but parrott your nonsense
Britain did nothing but create its own nonsense, which echoed your nonsense.
And this is all regardless, being the nonese is PURE NONSENSE.
Becasue, once again, how can you have UNDENIABLE evidence of WMDS, when no such thing exists.
Obviously, you cannot gather evidence of something that doestn exist.
Im sure If I told you I had undeniable evidence of female stripper aliens are about to invade us you'd call me senial. And rightly so, but when it comes to your government?.
Well, yuo'd rather be patriotic compared to a traitor... right?

''Those are the facts.
And I would ask that you stop insulting me. ''

I dont need to insult you, your political response and clear backing of this illegial war do more than anyone ever could.

history will show the current administration to be exactly what it is.
A morally CURROPT, Murderous, Greedy group of men who value a dollar bill over the lives and welfare of an entire nation.

Following them.. huh.. what more of an insult do you need.


reply posted on 19-2-2008 @ 10:51 PM by V Kaminski
reply to post by GradyPhilpott



You're right. Hahahahahah. I'm sorry you think so highly of yourself and that cheap-whore excuse for national leadership... typically Yank; "always about them." No matter, like the US internationaly, long-term. Must get lonely hearing that big "echo" in the hall of things of which to be proud. Geez, even the Brits aren't your lapdog anymore. It's OK though, the Israeli's are your master's voice... can't lose there. LOL.

Call you names? Eat gun metal. While you call Willie whatever - are you crazy? Are you sure? Got any evidence of your sanity? Do you have a degree that makes you fit to judge Mr. Phil? Are you an MD? Joe Evidence. Hahahahaha. A shrunken head or just old and comfortable, used to getting your own way? Hahahahaha. Senility happens, buy a gun, learn how to use it, make yourself useful. Derek Humphries book, page 113.

Ain't worth the breath and less of a challenge than the breathing the words to such a one as using mere names. Yawn. Lame to the nines old boy. Purchase a clue and a helmet or feel sorry for yourself and reminisce your own memories of the "good old days" when Bush meant something other than "not good". History, Prescott, Big George, Marv... fine US citizens. This is the 21st Century; not yours.

Willie might be old and a coot to boot... but he has something others may not. Senility? I call it courage. Can't help but like him... and he's a Texan. There's a little hope for the US... the next President (if this one decides to leave at all) couldn't be any worse. Likin' Vermont these days too.

Vic
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Republicans in Arizona plan to nearly wipe out public unions
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags
Tennessee threatens suit against man building boat with his son.
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
The CULT of Ron Paul
  Posted 16 days ago with 1 member flags
A Protest Technique From Russia (Lighten up OWS)
  Posted 12 days ago with 0 member flags