You really need to take these "Documentaries" with a grain of salt. It's very easy to make accusations against the military, and claim that those
they have captured, interrogated, or killed are completelty innocent civilians. I am not sayin that it is impossible for an innocent to have died
during interrogation, but when we all say "torture", the generally accepted idea of such involves mutilation, and extreme physical pain. The United
States Military does not perform torture in the classic sense of the word. They use mental deprivation to create an adverse environment in order to
break down the suspects pyschological barrier. Some may disapprove of this, but I stress that such techniques should be put into a truly relevant
perspective. Where as those we are fighting against would not hesitate in beheading an American/Ally, or mutilating them, we use methods which
although mentally anguishing, leave no permanent physical ailments. I can imagine an innocent going through this, and I would definitely feel for a
person if after using such methods I found them to be innocent. I really would feel bad, because I myself have been through certain adverse
situations, and I know how it can leave lasting mental scars.
Just remember though, if this person died I am certain it was an accident or negligence through the use of improperly trained interrogators. Don't
judge the military as a whole, or the general techniques used, because more often than not no one dies from these methods of obtaining information. I
know it might be ugly, but as long as the methods are regulated and done by professionals knowledgable in the techniques, along with being provided
EMT training in case of accidents, it seems an acceptable form of suspect information gathering.



