reply to post by SevenThunders
I don't believe it, but I think it is creating enough noise and will be promoted by those who will connect the claim of crack to a racial issue and
the gay to liberal, that Obama should respond. Here's the problem:
1. I believe someone is paying Larry Sinclair a lot to do this, threatening him, or both. Probably just #1.
2. Whitehouse.com is no bastion of credibility, more like a bastion of sleaze. Their offer, which Larry Sinclair has agreed to contractually, prevents
him from taking another lie detector test anywhere. How convenient. Why should we believe theirs, irrespective of the fact that there are numerous
ways to beat your standard, non-MRI type lie detector test?
3. The timing is almost Rovian in its potential for damage. This whole thing could have been created using a lot of resources, including legal,
monetary (think bribes, blackmail, etc.), investigative (when would it be hard for him to have proof to the contrary) and planning. This will take
time to clear up, and regardless of whether or not it is a complete fabrication, involving whitehouse.com or not, this needs to end quickly.
4. The best way to respond to this issue is to recognize early that it could have legs and cut it off immediately. Responding in some decisive way as
soon as possible would be best. Bury the valid response on some back page of the web and move on to the issues.
Based on the forces against him, I only hope that he does respond quickly and decisively.



