posted on Feb, 17 2008 @ 11:09 AM
As many people here have already figured out, I have searched for years for something that would show intelligence other than human in the cosmos. And
I still look, because reason tells me there is a fair chance that it will be found, in some isolated and unlikely spot. I cannot imagine that man
alone has intelligence.
Having said that, if "seeing" the evidence requires a severe amount of imagination or distortion of the evidence by mechanical means, then it is not
really evidence, IMO. If I have to close one eye and stand seven foot from the monitor and peek through the slits in a cardboard box, just to see
something that somewhat resembles a titmouse, then I'm not impressed. I could very likely see the same thing, using that method, looking into my back
pasture.
Now if there was signs that NASA et al covered up a mechanical device or creature that could be unmasked somehow, and this device or creature could be
seen clearly, sans the filtering, I would be impressed. If the device or creature shown had some logical vestige of reality, as in, it had enough
detail to seem reasonable, and it logically interacted with the surroundings, I would be the first to jump on the wagon.
I have seen some things presented by Mikesingh and internos and zorgon that certainly made me think there was something interesting going on. These
mostly were related to geometric shapes that could not be explained by accidental alignment in a natural setting.
I appreciate the OPs endeavor and hard work here, but I think most of this is a matter of letting one's mind play tricks. I once took Morse Code, and
after a few hours of listening to dots and dashes, you start hearing everything from the Joni Mitchell to Tchaikovsky in the background. The mind
wants to "fill in" the dead spaces where there is no input.
Just my $0.02.