WTO rules against China for first time, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 13-2-2008 @ 01:38 PM by DimensionalDetective

WTO rules against China for first time


news.yahoo.com
In the sweeping decision, the three-member WTO panel found against China on nearly every point of contention with the U.S., the 27-nation EU and Canada. The panel found that Chinese measures "accord imported auto parts less favorable treatment than like domestic auto parts" or "subject imported auto parts to an internal charge in excess of that applied to like domestic auto parts."

The three trade powers argued that the tariff was discouraging automakers from using imported car parts for the vehicles they assemble in China. As a result, car parts companies had an incentive to shift production to China, costing Americans, Canadians and Europeans their jobs, they said.

(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit on 13-2-2008 by DimensionalDetective]


reply posted on 13-2-2008 @ 07:55 PM by RedGolem
reply to post by Gools


China's currency is not tied to the global market and is thus kept unrealisticly low. That could be called protectionism also.


reply posted on 13-2-2008 @ 08:01 PM by Gools
reply to post by RedGolem


Ahh... I see.
They do it so why can't we?

Something is wrong with that argument but I can't quite put my finger on it.
.


reply posted on 13-2-2008 @ 08:59 PM by RedGolem
reply to post by Gools


Not saying they do it so why cant we. Am saying if there currency was liked to the world market there would most likely be less request for rulings or ruling being made from the WTO.
Or if we did artificially control the value of the dollar the economy would probably be better off then it is.



reply posted on 13-2-2008 @ 09:20 PM by Gools
reply to post by RedGolem


Just playing devil's advocate.

BTW if you think the US dollar isn't "artificially manipulated" I got news for you...

To get back to the topic:

As a result, car parts companies had an incentive to shift production to China, costing Americans, Canadians and Europeans their jobs, they said.


I doubt that was a big factor. It's more likely that labour costs were the prime reason for moving production to China.

This is just a means of trying to "blame China" for our economic situation and garner patriotic anti-China support in the general population. IMO of course.
.

[edit on 2/13/2008 by Gools]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 68 replies