The government lied to us...and they should have, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 12-2-2008 @ 02:23 AM by _Johnny_Utah_
Ok...now we've stepped into the relm of the Illuminati and such...Here's the deal with me. I used to be a believer in the Bilderberg and all that stuff...now, getting sorta iffy (sp?)
I may have seen the show you are talking about. Isn't he the guy who stands outside a building in texas shouting with a megaphone? He talks about how this skyscraper looks like an owl or something. He goes to canada and stalks this meeting where rich people meet? Maybe it's not him but if not it is guy just like him.
I have watched several of the "movies" or "films" on 9-11. I really have, I promise. And to be honest, I have to say they are compelling. They bring up many issue a lot of people outside of here don't want to talk about.
I am not trying to be rude either.
I think many people have a hard time accepting the fact that a very primative people were able to do what they did. I think it is much easier or maybe safer to believe there was more behind it. we can then blame "them" whoever they are. When people fall in line behind conspiracy theories and blindly accept those...they are somehow enlighten...but if someone believes or mostly buys the official story...well they are fools. Do you see the contradiction?
Now, to the point of being able to handle the truth and thinking the country should be full of sheep...of course I don't think that. I wouldn't be tossing out my ideas if I thought that.
I believe there are some things that should be kept from the public. Parents keeps troubles away from their kids. It's sort of similar in a way.

I bet i am so hated


reply posted on 12-2-2008 @ 03:38 AM by FreeThinkerIdealist
The TRUTH is the only option.


Lies breed distrust.


There is no good reason to lie, there is no acceptable situation.


When the government lies, it isn't to 'protect' the people, it is to protect itself from liabilities. Lies to guide you a certain way is propaganda.


We the people are in charge, we are the employers. All forms of government and departments are there to serve us, they exist because we allow them to, they have no right to lie.


Would you allow your employees to lie to you? To protect you from what? As the employer, are you not ultimately responsible for all things and you should know and be in control of all things?

The will of the people is the duty of the government. Never forget that.


If it was the Navy, mistakes are made, humans are not infallible. I doubt it was terrorists back then ... I do recall when it happened.


Lies are a sign of corruption and culpability. Things have been allowed to happen in the past, things have been done by our own in the past. If they lie to keep you on their side, or to get their way ... then they are just as legally responsible as if it was their own hand.

Did not Charlie Manson go to jail though he did not commit the murders himself? Would you not also be convicted of a crime if you withheld evidence of a crime or destroyed/removed evidence from the crime scene?


The government, the military, and all other sections paid by the people are not above the laws that exist for the rest of us ... in fact, they should be held to a higher standard while representing us.


I will never accept an excuse that it is in my best interest to be lied to, not by the government, not by a friend, not by a family member. Deceit is never the right thing to do and is never acceptable.


reply posted on 12-2-2008 @ 09:24 AM by _Johnny_Utah_
I understand how you feel about the lies. But can you really compare our government to a business? Our government spies, knocks off bad guys, and goes to war with other nations (this has nothing to do with Iraq, just a broad statement), and all sorts of stuff like that...
When business does things in the same way, it is called insider trading and it is illegal. So, while some of the comparisons hold...they all don't.
And while we the people are the employer, we are not an employer in the regular sense of the word. We elect (hire) people to do what we choose, but there are limits (and rightly so) to the information we can access. A CEO has no such trouble.
I am not a fan of cover-up's, but I do think there needs to a balance or a frame of reference to what the nation or the world is told.
If a false statement is given, but when it is said it protects the national and economic welfare of America...almost 300 million, I think there is an amount of good caused through it which out-weighs the damage or evil of the lie itself.
Which would be worse? Lying to the public or causing a national panic about something we can't control and didn't happen again?
People want the truth and so do I. But do I need all of it?
Do people want to know that the loving parents they had growing up thought about having them aborted when they were in the womb? Do you want to know that your mother slept around on your dad when you were growing up? No, some things should be kept private and if for some reason you ask about them...you should be lied to about them...for your own good.
I hope that makes sense...



reply posted on 12-2-2008 @ 09:59 AM by BlueRaja
Originally posted by csulli456
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to
post by _Johnny_Utah_




As far as Bill Clinton goes, he is in on it all too, so I don't trust a thing he says about 9/11. He has been "adopted" by the Bush family whom he is very close with, even in public, up until Hillary started her run for President. Keep in mind that Bill is a Bilderberger, and it is strongly suspected that Hillary has been to at least two or three meeting now.



[edit on 2/12/0808 by jackinthebox]



Its obvious,
"Great minds think alike" (even simultaneously) lol

Great post


Well I'll agree with the think alike part, but I'm not prepared to go beyond that.



reply posted on 12-2-2008 @ 10:00 AM by BlueRaja
reply to post by _Johnny_Utah_



Johnny, you're wasting your time arguing with those folks. They've made up their minds that regardless of what happened, it couldn't possibly be as a result of a terrorist attack.


reply posted on 12-2-2008 @ 11:39 AM by whaaa
Originally posted by BlueRaja
reply to
post by _Johnny_Utah_



Johnny, you're wasting your time arguing with those folks. They've made up their minds that regardless of what happened, it couldn't possibly be as a result of a terrorist attack.


And obviously it is pointless arguing with folks that worship authority rather than questioning authority and are satisfied with the lies and corruption. Men have been sent to the gas chamber on circumstantial evidence much more flimsy than 911 evidence.




“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.”
Bertrand Russel


reply posted on 12-2-2008 @ 11:45 AM by _Johnny_Utah_
I don't see how ANY government can survive by keeping everything in the open. In our personal, business, and religious matters we don't either. There are somethings we like/need to keep private.
If we are the employer like you say (and i agree with you) then the model of the cars salesman doesn't match. We are both the buyer and the seller, maybe more true....we have hired a someone to sell us something.

the sad fact is that there are bad people out there who would love nothing more than to have nations like the UK and America destroyed. In order to preserve those things we hold dear, there has to be a film of darkness. If you had an enemy who wanted to kill you or ruin you, would you broadcast everything you did to him? would you make sure anyone who wanted to know anything about you knew? Would tell him you plan to stop him and you are going after him in this way with this certain route? No, that would be silly.

Maybe some of the difference we have, i think, is in how we see people overall. Yes, there are some people who would do anything to stay in power, but to say or make it seem like most of them are like that is unfair. they are people just like you and I...some good, some bad.

The truth isn't always helpful to situations. Is it wise to tell a mass of people the building is on fire or there is a bomb threat, or is it better to have them evacuate calmly and with order? Then once the situation is past, they are safe...
When we look back on things we say "yes, I deserved to know!"
But the reality is all we needed to know was that things were taken care of
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 1 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags