Originally posted by FreeThinkerIdealist
but, to punish for free thought, in a free country ... now that doesn't sound right at all.
Sounds like another case of - You are only free if you agree.
In your case, I would say it is Berkeley and YOU who thinks someone should be allowed Constitutional protection and freedom if they agree with you.
What Berkeley has done is violate the US Constitution, specifically the Equal Protection Clause. In giving Code Pink a special permit, and a special
parking place, what Berkeley has done is say that Code Pink's "speech" is more valuable than anyone else who would like to demonstrate at the
recruiting office, either pro or con. They gave Code Pink special-status and extra-ordinary rights because they agree with Code Pink's "speech,"
things they have not allowed other groups, specifically those who may support the Marines.
You know, you're free only if you agree.
Like how I turned that around?