Ron Paul Appears to have Given up 2008 Presidential Bid to Focus on Congressional Run, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 9-2-2008 @ 07:10 PM by Operation AJAX
reply to post by xstealth



Yes that exactly what he said. He is turning his efforts to preseve his seat. But keep sending me money!!!!!

No doubt he will kepp his presidential campaign going simply to enrich his coffers for future endeavors. its really that simply. You savior seems to reek of the same old brand of politics

[edit on 2/9/08 by FredT]


reply posted on 9-2-2008 @ 09:00 PM by dbates
I know you guys disagree stongly, but I'm not the only one who reads his recent email as "I give up". Funny , the New York Times sees it the same way.


Paul Concedes Race, Sort Of
In a message to supporters sent just before 11 p.m. Friday night, Representative Ron Paul, a long-shot G.O.P. candidate from Texas, basically conceded that he’s not going to win the party’s nomination.


And look at this short summary on Slashdot.

Has Ron Paul Quit?
Lally Singh sends us to the inside-the-Beltway blog Wonkette for a quick take on a letter Ron Paul sent to his supporters. In this analysis, Dr. Paul has basically called it quits.


I know a lot of you feel strongly about Ron Paul, but how can you still believe that he has any hope of winning the 2008 Presidential election? Okay, sure he didn't say "I quit" but anyone willing to look at the situation with an open mind will see it that way. When Mitt Romney "suspended" his run what did everyone say? The said he conceded and they were right. Did Mitt Romney say "I quit"? No, but we all get it. It's a shame that many of you here don't "get it". Politicians are not going to say they are quitting. That wouldn't be right. They simply re-shift their focus to other things.

"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet".



You can call it what you want, but Ron Paul has just effectively given up on being President this year.


reply posted on 9-2-2008 @ 11:53 PM by The Cyfre
I don't see what the conflict is in this thread.

I received Ron Paul's email the moment he sent it and I read it thoroughly. I got the same impression as the OP did. I have been a supporter of Ron Paul since the first debate where Giuliani tried to make a name for himself against the bomb-thrower Paul. I'm not taking any offense to any of this.

I don't believe in God, and i don't believe Ron Paul, at this point, has any shot at winning the GOP nomination. Additionally, it makes zero sense for him or his supporters to think it would be a good idea to continue the fight for the nomination full-throttle and risk losing his Congressional seat as well. Something is better than nothing, is it not?

I first posted news of this announcement last evening in the US Politics forum, but i'll reiterate here.

Ron Paul is a catalyst for something bigger. He is the vessel of this message at this present time. Real change doesn't happen in one election cycle as Obama supporters will soon find out when Hillary gets the nomination because of her overwhelming establishment support. Real change happens over the course of years, and it's up to supporters of "the revolution" to continue to propagate that change via more regional elections such as the Senate and House races.

Doesn't that make more sense? Doesn't change always happen from the ground up? Ron Paul is a pacifist, he is a strong supporter of non-violent protest the likes of MLK and Ghandi. Change will happen only if we can carry on this mobilization into regional elections and change Washington from the inside out.

There are a handful of politicians in government who truly have our best interests at heart. Just a handful. It's high-time we start electing more of them in my opinion. The Revolution can and must live on there.


reply posted on 10-2-2008 @ 12:09 AM by biggie smalls
reply to post by dbates



You still interpreted it wrong. Here's the story from AP:

Ron Paul Vows to Remain a Republican in Race

The Texas congressman wrote on his Web site Friday that he is making cuts to his national campaign staff and that he must also stay focused on not losing the primary for his House seat.



He is making cuts to his campaign, not dropping out.

dbates, you really need to change the title of your thread. Its very misleading and erroneous.

He hasn't appeared to have given up anything. He needs to focus on the Senate race for the moment, but as soon as that's over, he'll be back.

Same thing happened with Kucinich, but his support is not nearly as significant with the mainstream.

A few other quotes from the source:

"With Romney gone, the chances of a brokered convention are nearly zero," Paul wrote. "But that does not affect my determination to fight on, in every caucus and primary remaining, and at the convention for our ideas, with just as many delegates as I can get."


He plans on 'fighting on' in the remaining primaries and the caucus.

Where does he say he's dropping out?

I must be illiterate or something because I don't see a single drop of evidence of him dropping out.

In the presidential race and the congressional race, I need your support, as always.


Check his website for the email (www.ronpaul2008.com)

He needs our support in both races and I see no evidence for him dropping out of either.


reply posted on 10-2-2008 @ 01:01 AM by xpert11
There is an existing older thread .

Well all I can say is that Paul and other minor candidates will never have any real influence unless the US becomes a representative democracy . My advice to Paul fans is to start a grass roots movement that supports MMP and Dennis and Ron running on a independent ticket in 2012/16 .



reply posted on 10-2-2008 @ 08:27 AM by The Cyfre
Originally posted by biggie smalls
He is making cuts to his campaign, not dropping out.

He hasn't appeared to have given up anything. He needs to focus on the Senate race for the moment, but as soon as that's over, he'll be back.


He is running for re-election in Congress as a Republican. He is on the verge of losing the GOP nomination for President. He is not going to run for his House seat as a Republican, and then run for President as a third party. It doesn't make sense.

Originally posted by biggie smalls
He plans on 'fighting on' in the remaining primaries and the caucus.

Where does he say he's dropping out?

I must be illiterate or something because I don't see a single drop of evidence of him dropping out.


He hasn't dropped out of the Republican race, but he has acknowledged the fact that he isn't going to win the nomination. Many may perceive his dropping out because his level of support is the equivalent to having dropped out of the race for many Americans. You have poll workers telling voters that Ron Paul dropped out of the race which is why he wasn't on some ballots. It's all fine and good to be into the cause and hopeful of that cause, but the chips are down so far they're underground, and to think Ron Paul's 21% finish in Washington state laste night is going to thrust him into the winners circle, you're wrong.

Originally posted by biggie smalls
He needs our support in both races and I see no evidence for him dropping out of either.


Again, he isn't dropping out. But he is accepting the fact that he won't win. As a Ron Paul supporter i'm okay with that because i know the real power will come when we start electing responsible politicians to other facets of government such as the House or Senate.


reply posted on 12-2-2008 @ 11:49 AM by biggie smalls
reply to post by The Cyfre



No bud, you're wrong.

He's still 'in it to win it.'

Nothing has changed.


reply posted on 13-2-2008 @ 08:20 PM by cryingindian
reply to post by dbates



You're sitting down in your picture because you're between 4 and 4 1/2 feet tall, aren't you? Be honest.

Please tell us "ridiculous" supporters of the Constitution who we should vote for. Am asking you for your help.

John McCain, who did serve our nation, and was held captive in Viet Nam, doesn't get my vote. I've stated in other threads that I have boys and don't want to see them HAVE TO serve their country by way of a draft. Ron Paul asks, "How can we afford to stay in Iraq for another 'hundred years?'" What's you're response to that question?

Then there's this:

www.libertypost.org...

What do you think?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Truth, Lies, Oil and Scotland
  Posted 19 days ago with 8 member flags
Russian cops mistake nationalist rally for gay pride parade
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
Republicans in Arizona plan to nearly wipe out public unions
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Tennessee threatens suit against man building boat with his son.
  Posted 1 days ago with 4 member flags
The CULT of Ron Paul
  Posted 14 days ago with 1 member flags