Paradise Lost and Found?

Have archaeologists found The Garden of Eden at Göbekli Tepe in southern Turkey?

www.archaeologynews.org



Göbekli Tepe





Why did they go to the trouble of covering it up?

More on the dig



Picture of one of the sculpted pillars.


Some of the other claims as to the location of the Garden of Eden include, other parts of Mesopotamia, Africa and the Persian gulf.

Garden of Eden

Dilmun, also has been linked to the Garden of Eden story.



Whether it is Eden or not its a fascinating link between the move from a hunter gatherer lifestyle to agriculture.

mojo

Great post, very informative. Starred and flagged.

just a thought...even if that place was what the bible calls the garden of eden, would it really offer up much validity to the claims of said book?

most fictional stories are based off of actual events or locations, so unless they find an angel with a fire-sword guarding a tree with fruit that is proven in a lab to alter one's DNA to perceive the "all" of the universe, i do not think it would knock any skeptics on their religious buttocks.

looking at that sculpture I can certainly see that figure holding a round object in it's appendage representing the serpent tempting adam and eve with the forbidden fruit.

No, it offers no validity to the bible.
I agree with what one of the archaeologists said, if anything it is proof of a racial
memory passed on to future generations of a time when our ancestors were in the
process of moving from a hunter gatherer society to an urban agricultural one. It is
accepted by most unbiased scholars that sumerian myth is the basis for much of what
ended up being recorded in biblical scripture.


My belief is that the cultures from turkey (Catalhoyuk and Göbekli Tepe and a few others) were the pre-cursor cultures to the Ubaidian and Sumerian cultures.



Hmmm, i went back and looked closely at the picture after reading your comment and yes i think it could be interpreted that way. I'm no expert but from a laymans pov i agree.


mojo




[edit on 9/2/08 by mojo4sale]

Also notice the Tempter is not a limbless snake. The creature with the fruit is a bird. Birds can mimick speech but snakes cannot.

Some verses in Genesis:

"And the serpent said to the woman..."
"On your belly you will go."

I would say birds are more cautious than snakes.

reply to post by mojo4sale

---

Awesome find mojo!

I'm under the impression that multiple civilizations all started at once and this could possibly be one of those epicenters.

I don't think this is proof of the "Garden of Eden" from the bible. One Irish scholar/priest figured out the year of creation to be 4004 bc. Well, that theory kinda goes out the window regardless of how old the universe is...

reply to post by biggie smalls

---

Likewise, i dont necessarily believe this is the garden of eden. What i found fascinating though was why they would bury the whole thing under tons of soil after they decide not to use the site again.
Does it seem strange to anyone else that they would do this?
It seems a lot of trouble to go to to cover up something that you have decided means nothing to you anymore.
Or is it just me.

I consider the Garden of Eden story to be no more than a "things were so much better in the good ol' days" myth - perhaps inspired by folk memories of hunter gather times before we started toiling for food.

Nonetheless Göbekli Tepe is a fascinating site




Well, we bury dead people. Why not dead religious centers?

[edit on 14-2-2008 by Essan]

Sure we bury dead people, in fact there are zillions of them.
How many religious centers can you think of that have been deliberately buried?
It might just me but i dont think the answer is that simple.

I'm more inclined to believe that perhaps they were hiding it for some reason?

mojo

Or they were made to cover it up.

I have only ever seen the date of creation in the bible calculated by counting the generations back to the date of the creation of Adam. Not the Earth.

If the whole Sumerian-myth-fueled ancient astronaut theory is actually correct, this would coincide with the Veda's 3300 BC (ish) proposed date. In fact, it seems a lot of stuff really kicked off from around 3000BC onwards.

It could be that the new "gods" look at the previous fertility religion and think "kill that as soon as possible". Religious sites are normally abandoned and left well alone, hence the abundance of them still standing.

Burying it does sound odd, but as mentioned above.. they may have been made to bury it.

To dismantle or destroy such an area would be a painstakingly event and would take considerable time.

If the theory was they had to 'get rid of it' in a hurry, then burying it may be the way to go.

Incidentally, how did they come to the conclusion that it was purposely buried. Or was this speculation?

(I haven't had time to read the article yet )

Great post. This is the type of post that keeps me looking at this site.

I'd love it if someone has the time to find some links to sites that have pictures of this site.

I've found a few but the pictures were very limited.

Keep up the good work.

I'll see if i can dig up ( no pun intended ) some more info and pictures when i get home from work.

mojo