Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by eyewitness86
browneyewitness ~
It's a conspiracy site. I agree. What I don't agree with is trying to disgrace a man the way you and others are. It's one thing to claim planes were remote controlled, thermite in the towers, 93 was shot down.... etc...
But speaking ill of a man who more than likely IS a hero is sickening to me. IF you are going to slander a dead man, you should at least have some evidence to back it up.
Considering Daniel Lewin's Mossad ties, that is a moot point in the case of 9/11/2001. Stop trying to put people on a guilt trip. It is not going to work with any correct criminial investigation, particularly one as massive as 9/11/2001.
When people play with fire in the spook world, they take high risk they are going to get burned, and any loved ones stand to be burned as well, even if the relatives knew nothing about the highly dangerous secret life of their loved one. The people who need to think about the emotions and safety, of their loved ones, are the ones causing the highly potential burning of their loved ones.
Aren't Mr. Lewin's direct ties with MIT are quite interesting?
archives.cnn.com...
MIT beginnings
Lewin founded Akamai in September 1998, with Tom Leighton, the company's chief scientist, and a leading group of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) researchers and business professionals. The company's base is in Cambridge, Massachusetts, very near Boston.
Who made up the "official" report for the Bush administration? Would that be Thomas Eagar of MIT? I am very certain it was, because he put his name on it when was published in "Popular Mechanics".
I still remember people seriously speculating, that Jonathan Pollard was either a patsy, or set-up to take a fall for something he did not do. No different than Lee Harvey Oswald.



