Archbishop of Canterbury calls for Sharia law to operate in Britain

actually, and i could be reading all of this wrong, but it seems like a total apples to apples question to me.

do the non muslems in those countries also have to live under sharia law or do they get their own non sharia laws to dictate their lives. those 3%, 50%, 25% and 20% respectivly?

though i suppose that the hardline stance some take about the UK could be applied to those countries as well...ya know..."if you dont like it move"

eh im rambling, dont suppose i have a real point here

actually, tis nothing of the sort, more like apples and apples as the poster above says- in pakistan 3% of the population dont dictate any sort og agenda, and reference that in Sudan and Egypt- over there Christians are a much bigger minority than Muslims in the UK, and they are treated like proper second class citizens, and not imaginary second class as claimed by Muslims in the UK




No, rightful renunciation of any notion of shariah, indicative of the will of most people in this country to oppose any moves, including soft soap manouevres from this discredited archbishop



So it is ok for Iraqis to oppose foreign culture, but no British people?




Considering CHristianity moved WESTWARD from the middle east, this is an idiotic point, and the Crusades only occurred after previous ISLAMIC expansion/agression.