FBI 'Deputizing' Businesses and granting them 'shoot to kill' rights! , page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 35 times
Topic started on 7-2-2008 @ 08:36 PM by DimensionalDetective

FBI 'Deputizing' Businesses and granting them 'shoot to kill' rights!


www.progressive.org
Today, more than 23,000 representatives of private industry are working quietly with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. The members of this rapidly growing group, called InfraGard, receive secret warnings of terrorist threats before the public does—and, at least on one occasion, before elected officials. In return, they provide information to the government, which alarms the ACLU. But there may be more to it than that. One business executive, who showed me his InfraGard card, told me they have permission to “shoot to kill” in the event of martial law.
InfraGard is “a child of the FBI,” says Michael Hershman, the chairman of the advisory board of the InfraGard National Members Alliance and CEO of the Fairfax Group, an international consulting firm.

InfraGard started in Cleveland back in 1996, when the private sector there cooperated with the FBI to investigate cyber threats.

(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit on 7-2-2008 by DimensionalDetective]


reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 09:14 PM by goosdawg
Your link didn't work, tracked it down:

TheProgressive | Exclusive! The FBI Deputizes Business

Welcome to the beginnings of The Surveillance-Industrial Complex.

Here's a couple of scary quotes from the article:

InfraGard is not readily accessible to the general public. Its communications with the FBI and Homeland Security are beyond the reach of the Freedom of Information Act under the “trade secrets” exemption, its website says. And any conversation with the public or the media is supposed to be carefully rehearsed.


And:

“The meeting started off innocuously enough, with the speakers talking about corporate espionage,” he says. “From there, it just progressed. All of a sudden we were knee deep in what was expected of us when martial law is declared. We were expected to share all our resources, but in return we’d be given specific benefits.” These included, he says, the ability to travel in restricted areas and to get people out.
But that’s not all.

“Then they said when—not if—martial law is declared, it was our responsibility to protect our portion of the infrastructure, and if we had to use deadly force to protect it, we couldn’t be prosecuted,” he says.




Here's the link to the ACLU's take on this emerging threat to our liberties:

ACLU | Emerging "Surveillance-Industrial Complex" Is Turbo-Charging Government Monitoring, ACLU Warns in New Report





[edit on 7-2-2008 by goosdawg]



reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 09:29 PM by DimensionalDetective
reply to post by goosdawg




Thanks for the HU goosdawg-Link is fixed.

It just goes to show you who is numero uno to our government. But most of us all ready knew that. This just takes it one step further.


reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 09:35 PM by goosdawg
reply to post by DimensionalDetective



No problem, my friend.

Check out the edit to my last post...


reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 09:44 PM by Dock6
Sounds suspiciously as if this may be a re-named, US-version (or affiliated with at least) of Common Purpose, doesn't it ?

aftermathnews.wordpress.com...

www.commonpurpose.org...

[common purpose] rhetoric of the quisling
You are the Chosen, the voice of the New Age, the Leader of the Future. The Rules are not for such as you...

[Update: 20:50, London time - Common Purpose seem to be interested in the post, having made a visit we tracked back.]


Though not directly concerning our North American and Antipodaean friends, this actually does concern them very much because they are very much part of the thrust for:

Common Purpose

And what exactly is this common purpose? They state it themselves:

'Leading beyond Authority'

nourishingobscurity.blogspot.com...

bfbwwiii.blogspot.com...

www.eutruth.org.uk...

You can read about Common Purpose online .. few links above.
May seem this is confined to UK.

Not so.


reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 10:02 PM by kerontehe
reply to post by AWingAndASigh



Maybe not if you read the original article. These are reps from business and industry that have been deemed "critical infrastructure".

Water, power, agriculture, transportation...

I saw no language that claimed they were "deputized" or granted "shoot to kill" rights.

Any business or individual has the right to use force to protect itself if it feels threatened whether martial law is in force or not.

Would you not report illegal activity or use force to protect yourself or your assets?


reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 10:11 PM by AWingAndASigh
Originally posted by kerontehe
reply to
post by AWingAndASigh



Maybe not if you read the original article. These are reps from business and industry that have been deemed "critical infrastructure".

Water, power, agriculture, transportation...

I saw no language that claimed they were "deputized" or granted "shoot to kill" rights.

Any business or individual has the right to use force to protect itself if it feels threatened whether martial law is in force or not.

Would you not report illegal activity or use force to protect yourself or your assets?


Evidently YOU didn't read the story. It says:

www.progressive.org...

"Christine Moerke is a business continuity consultant for Alliant Energy in Madison, Wisconsin. She says she’s an InfraGard member, and she confirms that she has attended InfraGard meetings that went into the details about what kind of civil patrol function—including engaging in lethal force—that InfraGard members may be called upon to perform."

(I couldn't figure out how to do that news source text box thingie.)

Note that the business persons in the story were shaken up by their briefings. That tells me something is up because business types are generally in bed with government.

What I have a problem with is the idea the FBI is telling them to go out there and patrol during martial law. What the heck is going on? That isn't exactly a "normal" type conversation. All those untrained but armed people out there jumped up by FBI scare stories are going to be shooting anything that moves.

If you don't get that, then you need to wake the heck up!



reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 10:40 PM by kerontehe
reply to post by AWingAndASigh



Where does it say "deputize" or "shoot to kill" authority?

Here is a link to Infraguard website:

www.infragard.net...



Here is their description of what they do:
InfraGard is an information sharing and analysis effort serving the interests and combining the knowledge base of a wide range of members. At its most basic level, InfraGard is a partnership between the FBI and the private sector. InfraGard is an association of businesses, academic institutions, state and local law enforcement agencies, and other participants dedicated to sharing information and intelligence to prevent hostile acts against the United States. InfraGard Chapters are geographically linked with FBI Field Office territories. Each InfraGard Chapter has an FBI Special Agent Coordinator assigned to it, and the FBI Coordinator works closely with Supervisory Special Agent Program Managers in the Cyber Division at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C.

While under the direction of NIPC, the focus of InfraGard was cyber infrastructure protection. After September 11, 2001 NIPC expanded its efforts to include physical as well as cyber threats to critical infrastructures. InfraGard’s mission expanded accordingly.

In March 2003, NIPC was transferred to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which now has responsibility for Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) matters. The FBI retained InfraGard as an FBI sponsored program, and will work with DHS in support of its CIP mission, facilitate InfraGard’s continuing role in CIP activities, and further develop InfraGard’s ability to support the FBI’s investigative mission, especially as it pertains to counterterrorism and cyber crimes.


If you are truly an "innocent", how can this hurt you.


reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 10:45 PM by kerontehe
reply to post by goosdawg



InfraGard is an organization dedicated to the protection of the United States and the American people. In order to maintain a level of trust within the membership, all applicants undergo a background check performed by the FBI (for this reason InfraGard membership is currently limited to United States citizens). Applications are then screened according to a defined criteria and then passed to the local chapter for final acceptance (individual chapters may have more strict criteria).

Along with your InfraGard membership comes great responsibility. We value active members who are willing to devote their time, effort and talent to help build this organization and achieve our goals of protecting the American people. You will be a representative of the nation's largest volunteer organization dedicated to critical infrastructure protection.
]

www.infragard.net...



Acceptance requires a background and at least an equivalent to a Confidential level security clearance.


reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 11:09 PM by goosdawg
reply to post by kerontehe



And the fact that this organization is exempt from oversight under the FOIA doesn't in the least worry you to some degree?

Doesn't that open this enterprise up to abuse by those members that may be able to pass the background checks but, nevertheless, may possess ulterior motives?

Keep in mind, our "elected" representatives, and our law enforcement officers are subject to being vetted and, in view of the rampant corruption in government and the repeated reports of unrestrained thuggery under the color of law, look how well that's worked out for us.

Sorry, I don't have that much confidence in any 3-letter crew to look out for my interests over their corporate master's.





[edit on 7-2-2008 by goosdawg]


reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 11:50 PM by kerontehe
reply to post by goosdawg



I think everyone has some ulterior motive for an important and difficult time consuming action; such as responding to ATS threads.

FOIA access would apply like any other - after someone can be persuaded to declassify the data.

Since 1982, I have held intermittently both secret and top secret clearances. You not only have to pass initially, but if your personal situation changes, such as divorce or credit issues, you have to resubstantiate clearance.

My ulterior motive was to provide the best living I could find for my family.

By the definitions of some ATS members. I guess that makes me a cog in the NWO.

Good thing I am now retired/disabled or I might lose my ATS membership.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags