It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zx4551
I'm back – let's do it differently.
I stormed off and made myself look like a complete idiot. I am sorry and I hope you will all give me a second chance.
Originally posted by elendal
If I understand your point here, what you are saying is that construction of a black hole depends solely on energy and mass. They are, by the way, one and the same. That is energy/matter dualism doesn't exist, and that is well known.
Well I guess you could say it depends on both. Now I know what you are saying that they are one in the same, but they are also different. Much like plasma, gas, liquid, and solids are the same, but yet they are different.
Now, you could say that mass is not the same as matter. That is also known as the problem of descerning between inertial mass and the mass of matter. They are two very different things for today's science (as far as I know), and neither of them is really understood.
The mass of a body is a measure of how much matter it contains. Yes, they are 2 different things.
From what I know, and I'm not a theoretical physicist, just someone with a great interest in the field, I believe you are wrong. The creation of black hole doesn't depend on energy/mass alone. It depends on the density of mass. Increase density enough, and very, very little mass can create a micro black hole. What happens after that is anyone's guess.
This is a common concept, no problem. Denisty of weight or density of matter? Density of matter in my case. Density is the measurement of matter in a specific area. So to increase the density really does mean to increase the mass. A pound of feathers and a pound of lead both have the same mass, but different density (assuming equal area for measurement of density). Compress the feathers into the same area as the lead, now you have the same density.
Now, that we have this cleared, some quantum theories postulate that every single aspect of the Universe we see can be derived purely from geometrization os space/time. In other words, everything in this world is space (dash time), and the only reason we see stuff as being "something" is because of our 3-dimensional physical limitations. As I said, there are good indications that space is 8-dimensional. There could be (and most probably is) stuff there that we can't even imagine.
There are many theories on that. To take it up 1 dimension would be amazing...if we could *shrug* Thats the problem with theoretical physicists
Just thought this needed some further clarifications...
I must say again that I've never seen anti-gravity as a force in any of the physics papers I've read, but I've seen theoretical anti-gravity effects through electro-gravity force. I can't possibly see how such a force can be used to expand a black hole to any meaningful size, but that may just be the limitation of my knowledge.
I agree. I have not actually seen anti-gravity as a force. I have seen it as theory, but in order to have that, you need to have gravity as a particle or wave, then being able to counter act that particle or wave. That opens a whole new world of "speed of gravity" limits. Great reading if your into it. Also micro black holes are hypothetical and the standard model shows the LHC is no where close to providing enough energy. (we would need a LHC at least 100x larger than our solar system, I don't see area 51 having that)
I really don't know if any of OP's claims are possible, but I find quantum physics theories very interesting.
Originally posted by luxor311
The reason for the high level of security is most likely (and this is my educated guess, a very educated guess) because of the chemicals used and how they dispose of the hazardous waste as well as radioactive waste. Since the powers that run area 51 feel they are above the law and above the Government for that matter...
Originally posted by JDN24
Maybe the government doesan't know that he is writing classified information.....
Or maybe they do, and dont give a rats because its incorrect