It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
'Antiprotons are routinely produced at Fermilab for collider physics operations in the Tevatron, where they are collided with protons. The use of antiprotons allows for a higher average energy of collisions between quarks and antiquarks than would be possible in proton-proton collisions. This is because the valence quarks in the proton, and the valence antiquarks in the antiproton, tend to carry the largest fraction of the proton or antiproton's momentum.'
Originally posted by no_one817
I'm not trying to hijack anything. Let me explain why I chose to come to this thread. Very simple. You guys ahve sat through hoax after hoax, to be disappointed so many times that unless the person tells you some end of the world story that can only be ended by will smith jumping in a ufo, you wont believe the poster.
Im not claiming this for all of you. But some, and understandably, have been jaded because of hoaxers. Now Once again, you have someone offering you some elaborate story about time travel and such. I have never called his claims a hoax, but I am calling the person one. Why avoid simple answers. On my thread Ive tried to answer everything from the mundane coke machine to three orange lights on the sky( that might of been a u2u).
I have given my position, I doubt zx can even tell us when he takes a janet to gl. Yes it is a bit of an ego thing, I will admit. But not cause I want to be the only employee here. Thats not at all why. I feel that you guys should at least be privy to the facts.
Fact: I have answered every question to the best of my knowledge
Fact: I have been as open as possible with the ATS staff. Sometimes one can you scared of being caught as a nice blanket to avoid questions. You can ask our friendly mod who has been viewing this thread on my openness.
Fact: I have given my position
Fact: I don't claim to know all the juicy stuff, but has anyone thought that is because I am telling the truth? Since when is the absence of some information a guilty sentence?
Fact: I just told everyone about an incident involving a white magnum, a security breach I was made aware of as my las vacation ended. This has been verified as truth.
Fact: This person has avoided my questions every time posed to him, why?
If you stop and think for a moment, there is no way the OP is going to prove to you that he does what he says, or works where he works.
After a long line of interrogation, like "Whats the symbol above the door?", or any other questions we throw at him, are we any closer to knowing if its true or not?