It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

is this possible an chemtrail aircraft??

page: 1
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 02:58 AM
link   
For those who are interested in this subject, true or what?


a chemtrail exposer and whistleblower since the first day of chemtrailing the skies over denver....mid november 1998..........
notice sign on wall with yellow/black stripes around it says "sprayer 1".
this is scary & confirms what we all knew all along!!!!!!!!!


It can't be a crop sprayer can it? Or fire control?
________________________________________

FROM: TIM WHITE

INSIDE A GOVERNMENT CHEMTRAIL AIRCRAFT

www.cloakanddagger.de...
________________________________________

Here is the photo inside the aircraft brightened and contrast enhanced, the metal high pressure cask / barrels that you see hooked up in series have nothing to do with fire suppression as some might try to say, they have only one purpose and that is holding vessels for various chemicals / metals / biological / compounds, etc, to be sprayed via computer controlled means at high ( Above twenty thousand feet.) altitudes.



________________________________________
CLOAK AND DAGGER SPECIAL UNVEILING
FROM TIM WHITE
INSIDE A GOVERNMENT CHEMTRAIL AIRCRAFT

Souce; Andrew Johnson
www.checktheevidence.co.uk...


[edit on 6/2/08 by spacevisitor]



mod edit: caps in title and body of text

[edit on 2/10/2008 by kinglizard]



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 03:23 AM
link   
This is crazy, but plausible,

If this is true after all then we should sue somebody.

I would like to know where that picture came from... witch type of aircraft.. country etc


Thx for this!, starred & flagged



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 03:33 AM
link   
Forgive me for playing devils advocate here but perhaps another possible plausable explanation for this photo is that this Aircraft could be a test model of a large commercial passenger airplane. Most large aircraft would be fitted out with large arrays of sensors for monitoring flight systems on shake down flights to evaluate air worthyness of a new type of aircraft. If this was the case the barrels could be a ballast system to simulate passenger or cargo loading.

The only reason this springs to mind to me is it looks remarkably similar to a documentary showing the makings of the new super jumbo The Airbus A380 which featured footage of its air worthyness test.



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 03:40 AM
link   
that plane is waaay to small to be a A380..



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 03:45 AM
link   
I just meant the rig out looks similar to the avionics package that was used in the evaluation of the A380. Plasuable that it could be for flight systems monitoring rather than a more nefarious puspose. Lets face it whats the likelyhood of someone actually getting a photo of the interior of a chemtrail spraying aircraft. More likely to be a photo of some variety of test flight.


+3 more 
posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 03:45 AM
link   
reply to post by sabre151
 


And we have a winner!

Here are some links that show the Boeing 777-200LR undergoing flight testing, including views of the barrels. They are indeed a ballast system to check for handling during shifting loads.

777-200LR Worldliner

Pic 2

Reverse angle, showing avionics


[edit on 2/6/2008 by eaglewingz]



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 03:51 AM
link   
reply to post by eaglewingz
 


Well, I give the winner a star, thanks for the info guys.



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 04:02 AM
link   
reply to post by eaglewingz
 


Yay, again common sense and research wins over scare mongering and assumption.

Good job eaglewinz

Star for you



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 04:06 AM
link   
So, if those barrels are just ballast then ...

please tell me why there is a HAZMAT box on the wall?


So, they use hazardous materials as ballast?


Thanks for your patience and answers.



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 04:15 AM
link   
Well there are alot of toxic materials on airplanes even the de icing fluid (usually propylene glycol) is fairly toxic. Not to mention the hydrolic fluid which is under pressure and the fuel itself for the plane both of which definately qualify as hazardous materials



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 04:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by FreeThinkerIdealist
So, if those barrels are just ballast then ...

please tell me why there is a HAZMAT box on the wall?


So, they use hazardous materials as ballast?


Thanks for your patience and answers.


most companies now a days make you take a HAZMAT class for wendex. the chemicals you in counter on a jet everyday would more than warrent the use of hazmat clean up



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 04:52 AM
link   
That picture was taken inside Prototype 02 Boeing 777-LR

tailnumber N6066Z August 8 2005 on Paine Field Everett

during some successful single engine tests.

Pilots that day were Capt. Frank Santoni, and Capt. Suzanna

Hennemann flying as First officer.

The aircraft is today in service with one of Amercia's

biggest airlines.

The flightdeck:





A e-mail to www.boeing.com... can confirm that what
i'm saying is true, they also have the rest of the photoset for that day of that aircraft.



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 04:56 AM
link   


please tell me why there is a HAZMAT box on the wall?


Because it's the s-h-i-t-t-e-r


Lots of hazmat inside of that box


[edit on 6-2-2008 by Freaky_Animal]



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 06:06 AM
link   
reply to post by eaglewingz
 



Awesome debunking there eaglewingz. Star for you.

Would be interesting to see Tim Whites reponse to this.

CT



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 07:36 AM
link   
reply to post by FreeThinkerIdealist
 


The hazmat warning is for what is inside the container on the wall. If the barrels were filled with a toxic material, then each container would need a warning on it. They would also be required to be in view, so from this picture at least, the barrels look 'harmless'.



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 08:42 AM
link   
for the love of common sense ....can the OP PLEASE change the title of this thread !!!!

it has been proven it is not a `chemtrail ` plane and therefore the title is not only misleading but false.

and i bet you this pic will end up on all the chemtrail sites and groups...proclaiming that it is the smoking gun ..etc....etc.


nice to see science and common sense is alive and well....


snoopyuk



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 09:06 AM
link   
It wasn't proven to me that it wasn't a chemtrail plane. Because the barrels aren't labeled toxic? It is against the law to spray toxic chemicals into the air, therefore I wouldn't think they would label the barrels (you know, one of those secret op projects- have to be sneaky!). This pic needs to end up on a chemtrail site.



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 10:03 AM
link   
reply to post by eaglewingz
 


having been given a starter for 10, i've just found this photo...

www.x-plane.com...

which is from this page:

www.x-plane.com...

and this:

www.x-plane.com...

from this page:

www.x-plane.com...

and this:

seattlepi.nwsource.com...

from this page:

seattlepi.nwsource.com...

It appears the photo that has got some people all het up may well have come from the 777-300 test program.

Oh, and before someone says "but what about this..."




this is the airbus equivalent of the same thing!



more to come as i find them!



[edit on 6/2/08 by rat256]

[edit on 6/2/08 by rat256]

[edit on 6/2/08 by rat256]

[edit on 6/2/08 by rat256]



posted on Feb, 10 2008 @ 09:35 AM
link   
The article on Rense exposes this photo as disinformation

www.rense.com...

Nevertheless, Chemtrails are real enough (ask for data about the aircraft making the trails and you'll likely get nowhere):

www.checktheevidence.com...



posted on Feb, 10 2008 @ 11:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by izopen
The article on Rense exposes this photo as disinformation

www.rense.com...

Nevertheless, Chemtrails are real enough (ask for data about the aircraft making the trails and you'll likely get nowhere):

www.checktheevidence.com...


Thanks for this interesting info izopen.




top topics



 
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join