I've got nothing of value to add to this one, but I'm gunna sit back and watch. I wish my freind's interenet was working, she's been taking the course to be an egyptian priestess. Its pretty interesting how ritualistic it is. I know what kind of intuition and awareness she has, and she has spoken to me about ancient aliens, atlantean colonists. She also has an impression that theres al illuminatti above the illuminatti, ancient aliens that were never able to fully mix with the human population.

Again, I have no proof, but I believe her intuition.

I think there is a lot being hidden there, like so much that it requires great effort to hide. That doctor guy has always bugged me, he always came off to me as a pawn.. but one with a massive ego. Thats just my perception of him, I'd say don't judge a book by its cover but by what skyfloating and some of the other members have been saying, it seems clear that I was right.

I read someones blog a while ago, they removed it, which really sucks.. but they took a few chapters from a book and posted it. This book was apparently written by a team of people who infiltrated the pyramids from the very top of the pyramid, by some sound operated door that worked on time intervals of 7. There was a narrow path of stairs that winded all the way to the bottom + roughly the height of the pyramid inverted perhaps. At the bottom was this big chamber with another sound operated door. It apparently opened from the word "genesis". They went inside and there was this completely sterile type of room. There was piles of these metallic discs that you couldnt burn and would bend back to their original shape if you tried to bend them. (memory metal, we have this already, I wonder where it came from *wink*). These round metal discs had unknown writing on them, they also claimed there was an anti-gravity machine down there.

Now, this is just a story, I can't even verify which book it came from, which kinda really sucks. But I found it REALLY interesting. Who knows, perhaps it was published as fiction when really someone knows something. I've heard of writers posting fictions, only to claim its fact several years later.

hmm, it does appear that I have contributed nothing of value, except enthusiam for this thread

Keep it up

Originally posted by Skyfloating
Absolutely. Egyptologists keep wondering why the ancient egyptians themselves never wrote about how the Pyramids were built. The explanation is quite simple: They dont know how the Pyramids were built. They were already standing when they founded their nation.

Beautiful!!!

Sometimes the most obvious and simple explanation makes perfect sense

"Lets not provide fodder for the UFO-Crowd"

Turkish-German author Erdogan Ercivan, who has published more than five books on alternative egyptology (much of it a rehash of Hancock-Bauval-West) has told the following story in one of his books. Since its not available in English nor found on google, I will talk about it right here.

In 1997 he received an invitation to an international convention of meteorologists because the organizer (F. Huber) was a fan of his book "The Stargates of the Pyramids" (not available in English). The organizers of the convention wished to invite several experts from the field of egyptology to hold talks and speeches for the elect crowd. The convention took place from the 4th to the 7th of September in the "German Museum" in Munich, Germany and Ercivan was honoured to mingle among dozens of mainstream egyptologists without them knowing they have an "alternative egyptologist" in their midsts. Ercivan relates several interesting speeches and discussions having taken place...and also the "UFO / Ancient Astronaut crowd" being made fun of. The following statement reportedly made by Marvin A. Powell, Assyriologist of the Northern Illinois University is most surprising though (rough translation): "Of the 500 000 cuneiform tablets, only 20% are published. Another 80% are translated, but we havent published them yet. They contain a lot of information on Astronomy, foreign planetary systems, visitors from the stars, and data on the origins of mankind. By publishing them we would only provide fodder for the Daniken-crowd" (audience laughs). (Note: Daniken of ancient-astronaut fame).

Ercivan is telling/publishing this story since years and the the Assyriologist has apparently not presssed charges for libel (probably considering the many witnesses present).

About the Egyptians taking over Pyramids that they didn't build, I think I heard that said about the Pyramids in South America as well.

Originally posted by ThePiemaker
About the Egyptians taking over Pyramids that they didn't build, I think I heard that said about the Pyramids in South America as well.

You "think you heard"? Some source or backup would be helpful.

Originally posted by CavemanDD

hmm, it does appear that I have contributed nothing of value, except enthusiam for this thread

In real exploration and research, enthusiasm has the highest value, and the to-the-core-negativity some of the "skeptics" portray has the lowest value. You´ve emerged from the dark ages of superstition

Thanks for all the replies and speculation guys.

Ive decided to try to keep a strict discipline of only posting stuff here that is verifiable and cannot be debunked. Up to now thats been:

1. The Hawass - ET Connection (page 1)
2. The Wall-of-Giza/ScottCreighton Triangle Connection (page 1)
3. The reported cuneiform-publication-conspiracy. (this page)

I will update this index as I go along. This shouldnt keep anyone from posting speculation though.

Part of the ugly wall (referred to on page 1) being constructed by the people who have hijacked ancient egyptian culture for their own marketing and merchandise purposes:

Originally posted by Skyfloating
The following statement reportedly made by Marvin A. Powell, Assyriologist of the Northern Illinois University is most surprising though (rough translation): "Of the 500 000 cuneiform tablets, only 20% are published. Another 80% are translated, but we havent published them yet. They contain a lot of information on Astronomy, foreign planetary systems, visitors from the stars, and data on the origins of mankind. By publishing them we would only provide fodder for the Daniken-crowd (audience laughs).

What cuneiform tablets is he referring to here? The ones from Sumeria? And who's got the rights to the information contained on them and how/when that info is published?

And was this statement made just recently?

thanks.

Just thought I'd add to the discussion with an extract from a book I read recently about th origins of the 'Great Pyramid' and in no other words than Khufu himself, the 'builder' of the pyramid.

TRANSLATED 'EXCERPT'

"Live Horus Mezdau;
(To) King (of) Egypt, Khufu, is given life!!
He founded the house of Isis
Mistress of the pyramid,
Beside the house of the sphinx"

This is off the 'Inventory Stela' which now resides in the Cairo museum, and clearly states that the Pyramids and the sphinx currently stood when Khufu reigned. Its the perspective you have chosen that dictates your beliefs, so I know people will have varying views on this, so I'm not going to mention the author at the moment, but I'm sure most people on ATS will know the answer anyway.

Some things I remember that I found interested when I read this, Ill only briefly cover them now, but hopefully they may raise questions that will help us to prove the case of Egyptology and ,I believe archeology in general, being a suppressed field.

I think this was mentioned earlier, but i remember reading that the sphinx and the '3 great pyramids' all have sustained 'heavy water damage'. Now an explanation I saw a while back states this is due to flooding from the Nile, but that doesn't explain how the water damage 'drowns' the entire area, so I am inclined to believe a 'flood' of some kind, maybe even 'the Great flood'?

Another point i found interesting was that Nowhere in the 3 pyramids is there any 'carved' hieroglyphs anywhere, except for some 'builders markings' found above (the kings burial chamber i think?), unlike all pyramids 'before' and after, which are severly adorned. (I won't go into the builders markings now)

In no pyramid since, or 'before' has there been any ascending passage(great pyramid only), which was 'discovered' in recent history. Only the descending passage and the rooms there of. This leads ME to believe that is because it was not known of in antiquity, as they had not built it, but also then dictates that they had to be copying off the 3 'original' pyramids in there design of the latter. Which leads me onto my next point...

The pyramids that stood 'before' the great pyramids were built as step pyramids, and covered in a lime stone casing. Obviously a fore runner to the GREAT PYRAMIDS? All pyramids built for many centuries after all showed this casing, as well as not being able to 'emulate' the 53 degree angle of the 'original', but opted for a structurally safer 42 degree's.

These are from what I can remember, so it's from memory, and may have a few discrepencies. Also note that the 'inventory stela' has been claimed a forgery by a cult from a time after the pyramids were built.

thanks. EMM