mr.O is a stool of satan-darood, the animal-headed fourth "channelling" runt who claims to have built the pyramid in the first place. it is ABSOLUTELY OBVIOUS there are other chambers in that pile of rocks, and mr.O knows exactly where to tunnel thru IF HE WANTED TO. but he doesnt. so we can only speculate on his "reasons". his master satan-darood has so far FAILED to REPENT for gross mal-administrations of earth, and has severely DELAYED the evolution of humans; so it could be decades before the bulldozers finally reveal his great "book of the atlantean butcher-miser-idiot". in the meantime, why not take your own bucket and spade, and go for a dig in the moonlight ?

I think this is my first proper post, so hello to everyone.

This subject really catches my eye, theres a big aura around the egypt topic. I just find it fascinating that the Giza Pyramids all coincidentally line up with Orions Belt. They were a very clever and spiratual society, who i personally think did have communication with exterrestrials and definitely worked with powerfull energies but like other things the truth gets lost and scattered, it will be interesting to read other peoples thoughts on the matter. Peace to all.

Originally posted by woodwytch

As I mentioned in my first post here, I detest the word 'channeling' because of the implications it brings with it ... unfortunately I have never been able to come up with a more suitable alternative.

But when I started getting my information from a 'seperated souce' ... I 'knew' it was 100% acurate but I needed to find something to support it (I couldn't just accept it as 'real' ... that's down to my inner-sceptic I suppose). That's also why everything I've received via this weird method ... I've looked for accepted documented (historical/religious/scientific) evidence to back it up. Hell, I even went back to school and did a university course in 'Natural Earth Sciences', to see if my bizarre information/theories held water ... and they do !!! The only problem remaining is (same old, same old), I can't prove it yet.

Well ima "new age hippie" type of guy maybe i can bring sone insight to your dilemma ....studies on the brain and consciousness are starting to show us that the brain is a sort of "quantum cage" to hold consciousness. It has also been theorized by many leading scientinst in the field of concousness that it maybe possible to switch consciousness with another entity, or to move consciousness "out of the cage".
the word "channeling" i personally precieve as creating a "doorway" or oppening in the protective "quantum cage" , which then another entity can assume conscious form in your body.

@ Sky.
I have heard edgay casey predictions of a multitude of chanbers hidden through-out the surface of the planet in precice geological positions, a few have been proven (sphynx, tiwan((?)if not then in tht area)).

how much proof, of how many chambers do we have?

Originally posted by vision
How cool would it be fore Zahi Hawass to talk about the possible spiritual reasons for these structures?

That would be outrageous

Originally posted by woodwytch

But I have to wonder how you can be so dismissive of my comments when you have no idea what I am actually referring to at this moment in time ?

I am not dismissive of your comments, I'm dismissive of the idea that Zahi Hawass is hiding something.

Originally posted by woodwytchI should probably make you aware that I am NOT referring to a small 'anti-chamber' (rear portion of the Sphinx), as being the much sort after'Atlantean Hall of Records' ... as some have claimed in esoteric circles. I probably find this idea as laughable as you do !

I am overjoyed to read this. I was beginning to wonder if anyone left at ATS had any sense.

Originally posted by woodwytch

'He has never, ever shut down any legitimate investigation'...

Are you absolutely sure of that ? (if so could you provide anything to substantiate your certainty please)

And what (in your own opinion constitutes 'legitimate' ... likwise what do you consider 'not legitimate'), a couple of examples would suffice ... just so I can understand your reasoning.

I use the Egyptian Government's definition. A researcher has to be associated with a legitimate research organization - typically a university or a state-sponsored research organization.

Note that this requirement is met by Cayce's group the A.R.E. A.R.E. has applied and been granted access to sites in Egypt for archaeological purposes.

You claimed that he shut down research on a whim yet you want me to provide evidence he hasn't?

Originally posted by woodwytchI'm curious about this because I find it difficult to see why a license can be granted (presumably and initially for 'legitimate' reasons) ... and then revoked unceremoniously when things start to 'hot up' a little. I was under the impression that new discoveries are a good thing !

Hawass has never done this.

I believe the instance you are referring to was where a group had a license to film inside of the ancient site (as I recall, it was the underground chamber under the causeway next to the Sphinx) but instead of filming, they began digging there.

Surely you must understand that Egypt simply cannot allow people to excavate ancient sites under false pretenses. Egypt today is trying as hard as can be to retrieve the priceless artifacts stolen over the last couple of centuries. Allowing excavations without controls would only exacerbate this situation as people such as this film crew could make off with more priceless antiquities. Since the government didn't give them permission to dig, had they not been caught the government would have had no reason to suspect they might be robbing the country.

Not that they were, but the principle remains.

Originally posted by woodwytch

'Why do you think John Anthony West should be accorded more and easier access to Egypt's antiquities, than a legitimate archaeological researcher' ?

After re-reading my post I neither said nor implied anything of the kind ... I think you are putting words into my mouth here.

Not really. You twice mentioned West had been poorly treated. West is not associated with any legitimate archaeological group, so to allow him access would be precisely the same as to allow him special privileges that are withheld from other researchers.

Originally posted by woodwytch

'Pure libel'

The accusation you aim at me with reference to my comparrison of Dr Hawass to a 'slavering Pit-Bull'...

I stand by my comments ... they are my personal opinion. To my knowledge everyone is entitled to have an opinion. However, if a moderater asks me to retract the comment from the post I will do so immediately ... but that won't stop it being my opinion.

No, I quoted the portion I thought was libelous:

He's like a slavering Pit-Bull ... whose purpose is to 'see off intruders' ... revoking licenses everytime someone comes close to going public about a discovery that is of a more 'unusual' nature.

The pit bull stuff is not libelous. The "revoking licenses every time.." part is libelous.

You have not shown even a single time Hawass has done this yet you claim he does it "every time"??

Originally posted by woodwytchOn this matter I'd like to provide just one example of why my opinion of Dr Hawass is so low ... there are many more reasons I could give as evidence but this is well written and easy to read.

I ask that you take the time to read ALL the information provided in the following link so as to get the full picture. This should also be read by everyone else who contributes to this thread (whichever side of the fence you sit).

Your link wouldn't work for me, but I bet you anything it leads to a story I've read and refuted before.

Look, I'm not personally fond of Hawass either. He is a real showboat.

But what you're saying here feeds into a completely false view of the field that is detrimental to even what little archaeology is discussed at this forum - namely that there is some uberconspiracy to hide the truth about the ancient world from us 'regular" people.

That is complete fantasy and is on it's face simply laughable.

Harte

Originally posted by Infadel
how much proof, of how many chambers do we have?

I dont know. Im trying to research off the beaten path and look into stuff that hasnt been looked into yet (see opening post). Bauval, Hancock, West, Stargate Conspiracy, etc. is not the end of the story.

Currently Im looking in the private beliefs of a few mainstream egyptlogists, the day-to-day events at Giza from a non-tourist perspective and the interest of secret societies in ancient egypt.

Originally posted by Paper_Chaser
I think this is my first proper post, so hello to everyone.

Welcome Paper Chaser.

Originally posted by Paper_ChaserThis subject really catches my eye, theres a big aura around the egypt topic. I just find it fascinating that the Giza Pyramids all coincidentally line up with Orions Belt.

That would really be sooo cool if it were true.

Unfortunately, it's not.

The Giza Pyramids don't line up with Orion's belt. They only come close if you turn Orion's Belt upside-down. Even then, it's not a match, not now, not 10,500 years ago.

Sorry pal. Like I said, it would have been cool.

Harte