It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Originally posted by L driver
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Yup! '500 MPH' at 700 feet is unreasonable.
Unreasonable merely to fly at this height/speed, or to maneuver as F175 did (allegedly did)?
Please, L driver, do not 'snip' out of my post to make it look like I said something that I did not!!
If anyone of credible intelligence wishes to read on, they will see that I said 'Yup! "500 MPH at 700 feet is unreasonable.".......BUT, I continued on...402 MPH is not impossible. NOW, I am paraphrasing myself, and I invinte anyone who is reading this discourse to scroll up and see what I actually wrote.
It is disgusting that someone would pull ONE sentence out of another person's post, and take it out of context.
Am I the only one who sees this as wrong??
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I attempt to qualify myself, by posts...you can read many of them...where I can explain things that relate to flying airplanes that wouldn't be known or understood by someone who just uses Google or a PC flight simulator...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I have read, from others, that the NIST Reports estimated the airplane's speed at about 500MPH.
I simply offered, from my perspective as a pilot, the explanation that maybe 500MPH was an over-stated assumption. It has, though, gotten into the lexicon of the 'de-bunkers', and that is a shame.
Originally posted by hooptie
I have questions: can this situation be duplicated by a flight simulator? I am unsure of that because of my ignorance to the sim, but I wonder if the simulator would allow these conditions to occur in a real life scenario. (ie would they be fully accurate?)
Are the models assuming that the plane is not flown wrecklessly?
-hooptie
Originally posted by weedwhacker
edit to add...no, I DID NOT learn this from the internet, in case you all are wondering. I know this because I actully flew the darned airplnes!!
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Upper left aft body.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
570mph (>250m/S) certainly doesn't match the observation (video) of UA175 and would appear to be up to 20% faster than actual which I'd put at closer to 200m/S or 500mph.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
Why is there no model with reduced building structural integrity which would achieve the desired outcome (eventual collapse) with a lesser impact speed?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
we can continue this in U2U if you want, and stop stealing the thread.
As for simulators, you CAN program some simulators to try to give you an idea of what happens when you go beyond the flight parameters. Boeing has done this to try to recreate several accidents, most notably the Egypt Air accident where the copilot dove them into the ocean.
archives.cnn.com...
Akamai: Co-founder dies in WTC plane crash
September 11, 2001 Posted: 5:09 PM EDT (2109 GMT)
Daniel Lewin
By Daniel Sieberg
CNN Science and Technology
(CNN) -- Daniel Lewin, co-founder and chief technology officer (CTO) at Akamai Technologies Inc., is said by his company to have died Tuesday as a passenger aboard American Airlines Flight 11. The Boeing 767, originally bound for Los Angeles from Boston, crashed into the World Trade Center in New York. Lewin was 31.
At 8:48 a.m. EDT Tuesday, Flight 11 became the first of two airliners to slam into the 110-story structure, opening an apparently coordinated terrorist attack on the United States that shortly would be felt in Washington as an attack was made on the Pentagon.
Lewin's presence on the plane and death were confirmed to CNN by George H. Conrades, chairman and CEO of Akamai, who said, "Danny was a wonderful human being. He will be deeply missed by his many friends at Akamai. Our thoughts and prayers are with Danny's family, friends and colleagues during this time of national tragedy and personal loss."
Felicia Spagnoli, spokesperson for Akamai, said, “Obviously this is a devastating personal loss and we’re all deeply saddened.” Spagnoli said Lewin left the company’s Boston headquarters Tuesday morning and was headed for Los Angeles on business matters.
In July, Lewin was named one of the Top 10 people of the Enterprise Systems Power 100, a list of industry leaders chosen for their effect on the IT (information technology) landscape and for their ability to influence the industry's direction.
MIT beginnings
Lewin founded Akamai in September 1998, with Tom Leighton, the company's chief scientist, and a leading group of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) researchers and business professionals. The company's base is in Cambridge, Massachusetts, very near Boston.
Akamai produces technology designed to facilitate online content delivery. Such software is meant to help companies reduce the complexity and cost of operating a uniform Web infrastructure. CNN.com uses a number of services offered by Akamai.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
reply to post by Valhall
Considering the actual plane speed appears to be even less than the lowest they used, the tower parameters would have to be much much lower to compensate. Is a structural issue with the towers getting swept under the rug here?