Video/Audio Willie Nelson: Twin Towers Were Imploded Like Condemned Vegas Casino Buildings

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

Maria, who asked us not to use her last name, had a view of the World Trade Center from her New Jersey apartment building. She remembers a neighbor calling her shortly after the first plane hit the towers.

She grabbed her binoculars and watched the destruction unfolding in lower Manhattan. But as she watched the disaster, something else caught her eye.

Maria says she saw three young men kneeling on the roof of a white van in the parking lot of her apartment building. "They seemed to be taking a movie," Maria said.

The men were taking video or photos of themselves with the World Trade Center burning in the background, she said. What struck Maria were the expressions on the men's faces. "They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange," she said.

Source...

That story seems to be the ABC story according to source.

It was indeed odd behavior. Later they were interviewed in isreali talk show:

Was it a long term debriefing as opposed to be detained as suspects?

Why would they be considered suspects, for simply making any video others were also making as well at the same time on the same day?

Was everyone shooting video that day detained as suspects as well?

What a fish story. "We are surrounded by terrorism every day and that is we made the video." Were they expecting it to happen, or were they just camera buffs on a tourist visit?

They just knew to bring their video cams with them, because the US must have so much terrorism, on a daily basis, we citizens have not heard or seen. But in Israel, their "tourists" must know what we living here do not know.

Those three remind me of the way very young Lee Oswald was used. They were too obvious to actually be inside Mossad. I would guess they are young military recruits, meeting their mandatory service obligation in Israel, and used for a mission keeping them out of harm's way, while testing their ingenuity to remain covert at all times. If that is the case, they obviously failed on that one.

reply to post by OrionStars


Yeah. Maybe they were even so spineless bastards - while being tourists - that they knew what would follow from those attacks - that US would attack Israel enemies, and therefore they were acting happily about it? But wait - how could they know who what was going happen?

reply to post by v01i0


Does not really take a brain surgeon to figure out that what they were watching was going to piss the US off cause us to take action. That and the knowledge that it would most likely have been Islamic terrorists that did it.

Dan Rather before they got their story straight.

Originally posted by biggie smalls
The Mossad agents were dancing in triumph of their accomplishment: Of fooling the world as to what really happened.

I was thinking about this yesterday.

Lemme get this straight: After pulling off one of the greatest feats of terror the world has known, by blowing up the WTC and the other buildings in the area, after having the military (that was involved) shoot down our own airliners, what do they do?

Do they exfil the area, like any other Special Operations unit would do at a time like that?

Nope, they're caught dancing in the street like it was New Years Eve in Times Square.

Right.

Oh, and my friend might not know about 9/11, but he sure does know how to make things 'splode, that's for sure.

They were there to DOCUMENT THE EVENT. That means they had no other role in the events, more than likely. They were young and excited and no doubt thought that no one was going to call the cop's over some neighbor seeing the actions as somehow suspicious. There are jerks all over, and it is not beyond possible that there are those who would get a thrill from seeing any major event, and being excited to have caught it on film.

Of course they may have been involved further with the plot, their van DID have explosive traces in it. But in any event, when that guy said " We were there to document the event", that means that they were set and ready and expecting it: Hey, maybe they were nothing more than ODIGO customers who figured that the warning was worth a chance at something happening and so set up a camera!!

They were MOSSAD agents that got caught and Cheroff let them go, naturally. The cabal of NWO bigshots that is taking the world and chaging it to their will has other plans: Can anyone believe that this is all random? There will be a series of events that will take our rights, and destroy America, and it is happening NOW.

They were there to DOCUMENT THE EVENT. That means they had no other role in the events, more than likely. They were young and excited and no doubt thought that no one was going to call the cop's over some neighbor seeing the actions as somehow suspicious. There are jerks all over, and it is not beyond possible that there are those who would get a thrill from seeing any major event, and being excited to have caught it on film.

Of course they may have been involved further with the plot, their van DID have explosive traces in it. But in any event, when that guy said " We were there to document the event", that means that they were set and ready and expecting it: Hey, maybe they were nothing more than ODIGO customers who figured that the warning was worth a chance at something happening and so set up a camera!!

They were MOSSAD agents that got caught and Cheroff let them go, naturally. The cabal of NWO bigshots that is taking the world and chaging it to their will has other plans: Can anyone believe that this is all random? There will be a series of events that will take our rights, and destroy America, and it is happening NOW.

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
As for Willie Nelson, I'm a fan,

Well, +1 for being in the AF.

-A million for being a Willie Nelson fan. That's just wrong on so many levels.


Biggie: Some of your "sources" are shaky, to say the least. Conspiracy sites aren't the best source of credible information. That's like someone saying, "Hey, Hitler wasn't so bad" on his "I(heart)nazis.com" website.

And having Willie as the "9/11 was an inside job" spokesperson ain't the best, either. Neither is Rosie.

"The whole military" wasn't involved in the exercises. There are plenty of units that probably weren't aware that they were even taking place.

I know that a lot of people believe that they towers were brought down by explosives, but for me, it's hard to believe how that much explosives could have been smuggled into the building without no one being the wiser to the actions. And I think it would have had to been done while the building was being built.

reply to post by jerico65


As for the whole smuggling explosives in because no one noticed excuse, I got you covered .

The WTC was shut down for a "cable upgrade" a day or two prior. Let me find the source.

Did the World Trade Center towers undergo a deliberate “power-down” on the weekend prior to the 9-11 terrorist attacks? According to Scott Forbes, a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, Inc. – a high-net investment bank which was later acquired by Franklin Templeton – this is precisely what took place. Forbes, who was hired by Fiduciary in 1999 and is now stationed at a U.K. branch office, was working on the weekend of September 8-9, 2001, and said that his company was given three weeks advance notice that New York’s Port Authority would take out power in the South Tower from the 48th floor up. The reason: the Port Authority was performing a cabling upgrade to increase the WTC’s computer bandwidth.

How convenient. A few days prior to the 9/11 attacks, no one is in the building.

A perfect time to plant explosives.

69.28.73.17...

www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...

And check this chilling news out:

This process, Forbes recalled, began early Saturday morning (September 8th) and continued until mid-Sunday afternoon (September 9th) – approximately 30 hours. As a result of having its electricity cut, the WTC’s security cameras were rendered inoperative, as were its I.D. systems, and elevators to the upper floors.

The security cameras and identification systems were offline.

That being said, ANYONE could walk in there with 'proper id.'

No matter if it was fake, the whole system was down so there could be really no electronic checks.

How do you explain this one away? You can't.

Forbes did stress, though, that there was power to the WTC’s lower floors, and that there were plenty of engineers going in-and-out of the WTC who had free access throughout the building due to its security system being knocked out. In an e-mail to journalist John Kaminski, author of The Day America Died (Sisyphus Press) and America’s Autopsy Report (Dandelion Books), Forbes wrote: “Without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors, and many, many ‘engineers’ coming in and out of the tower.”

Here's the smoking gun.

Power down a few days before 9/11.

We got you.


Here is Scott Forbes' interview:

killtown.blogspot.com...


And a youtube video devoted to the power down:




[edit on 2/11/2008 by biggie smalls]

reply to post by biggie smalls


So where's the debunkers?

You can't explain this one away. Its in plain sight for all to see.

WTC was shut down 2 days prior to the attacks with no security cameras working on most of the floors.

The power was out from floor 48 up and below that limited amount of power.

Try to debunk this one.

reply to post by biggie smalls



So, that video makes it sound like the mob burning down a business for the insurance money.

I don't think that much explosives could have been brought into those buildings in a weekend.

And the little "explosions" that everyone keeps talking about: That last youtube clip said that everything had to be pumped into the building, electricity, heat, air conditioning.

Oxygen since they were airtight.

O2 burns quite nicely when put to flame.

Originally posted by jerico65


I don't think that much explosives could have been brought into those buildings in a weekend.

Perhaps it wasn't explosives. Perhaps the buildings were designed to be brought down.

Ever heard of thermite?

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by biggie smalls


Biggie............do some actual research prior to posting:

Both towers were not shut down. Only two floors of 1 tower were getting 're-wired'......the company they was updating their computer infrastructure.

This has been previously covered............try searching before posting drivel.

Thanks!

[edit on 11-2-2008 by ferretman2]

Willie should talk to Merle. I think Merle is ready to turn for truth!

If Merle turns watch out! Finally the rednecks on my side...that would be a boon to the truth movement!

Cmon Merle!

Originally posted by ferretman2
reply to post by biggie smalls

 

Biggie............do some actual research prior to posting:

Both towers were not shut down. Only two floors of 1 tower were getting 're-wired'......the company they was updating their computer infrastructure.

[edit on 11-2-2008 by ferretman2]

If that was what was happening, didn't that shut down all security cameras as well? Aren't they run directly off the dbase?

reply to post by ferretman2


No.

The security system was shut down.

It doesn't matter if the power wasn't out in both buildings.

You need to do some research.

Thanks Orion, I almost forgot about that .

reply to post by jerico65


Yeah its too bad the explosions went off prior to the plane hitting (Tower 2?).





There's plenty of videos on youtube with bombs exploding prior to the planes hitting the WTC.

However, you have to wait a few minutes before you see anything so I figured a witness testimony and 9/11 HERO would be more credible anyway.

This man was there.




A missile attack?






[edit on 2/12/2008 by biggie smalls]

reply to post by whaaa


I believe the buildings had multiple things working against them.

Can I be sure how 9/11 happened?

No. I don't think there's any story that actually has all the elements laid out.

However, I believe this needs to be researched in depth. We can't let these cowards get away with murdering innocent civilians (And no I don't mean Al Aqaeda, or should I say AlCIAda).

It is quite possible the supports were melted prior to 9/11. But that is only part of the story.

I am almost positive 2 planes hit the WTC. That is not enough to bring down buildings that were built to withstand hurricane force winds.

Simply not possible. The fires were not burning hot enough to melt anything near the planes.