It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Video/Audio Willie Nelson: Twin Towers Were Imploded Like Condemned Vegas Casino Buildings

page: 2
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 01:02 PM
link   
I listened to the interview yesterday and it was quite good. Aside from 911, Willie and Alex covered a lot of other subjects like Bio-diesel and the use of hemp. I also learned something else very interesting from Willie and Alex that is sort of off topic: Prohibition was really started to prevent farmers from making their own fuel (Ethanol=moonshine).




posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 01:28 PM
link   
reply to post by seawolf197
 


Willie isn't the guy you want as the poster child for the truth movement. You might as well have Fred Flintstone say it's a conspiracy



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 02:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by seawolf197
 


Willie isn't the guy you want as the poster child for the truth movement. You might as well have Fred Flintstone say it's a conspiracy


OK Willie might not be the best choice.

How about some of these guys..........

www.patriotsquestion911.com...



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 02:57 PM
link   
It has also made ABC News as well.
Its a video story,and you can see it here...
abcnews.go.com...
and here
abcnews.go.com...



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:03 PM
link   
I am going to speak on behalf of the debunkers......


Willie Nelson is a self professed drug abuser and probaly has seen aliens.

Willie writes music and is not a engineer. Besides, isnt he 84 or something years old?



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:05 PM
link   
I heard Jessica Rabbit thinks 9-11 was an inside job too!

Oh, and the lead singer from Stixx, the one armed drummer from Def Lepard, the guy that does the voice overs for those great Military channel shows and Mike Rowe thinks it was a dirty job.

Now if that isn't proof, I don't know what is.



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by IvanZana
I am going to speak on behalf of the debunkers......


Willie Nelson is a self professed drug abuser and probaly has seen aliens.

Willie writes music and is not a engineer. Besides, isnt he 84 or something years old?


Well isnt G.W Bush also a "recovering" alcoholic and coc aine addict.
And obviously he was still able to become president,so if he can do drugs and be a drunk and yet still be president,then Willie smoking pot,has little to do with what he believes about 9/11.

[edit on 5-2-2008 by Black_Fox]



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
I heard Jessica Rabbit thinks 9-11 was an inside job too!



LOL! and over 75% of the world's population aswell!!

[edit on 5-2-2008 by IvanZana]



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar


Oh, and the lead singer from Stixx,

Now if that isn't proof, I don't know what is.


Denis DeYoung? NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! The horror~!!!


Mod Note: One Line / Off Topic Post – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 5-2-2008 by elevatedone]



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:12 PM
link   
So what Willie Nelson has to say needs to be ignored? When did he have his rights as a citizen revoked? When is up to a small minority to decide who has the right to be heard?

OH, the whole "I smoked pot" thing on Willie Nelson means that he needs to be classified as a nut job. But then you have to throw out anything Bashful Bill Clinton says, even if he didn't inhale. And then there's Obama, who had drugs in his youth.

Damn, I guess that just leaves those paragons of truth and the American way who have expressed their displeasure on this thread to decide worthwhile citizens to be heard. No skeletons in any of those closets I'm sure.

If the NWO comes to power they'll be looking for such "citizens" to make lists of the rest of the population, because it's plain they know undesirables when they see them.

I guess you can tell that I'm impressed.



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:14 PM
link   
reply to post by IvanZana
 


And now being old means you're a candidate for a straightjacket? I shudder to think that the future is in the hands of such intolerance.



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by SlightlyAbovePar
 


Boy that sure was witty par. I noticed that you have Jim Marrs listed as a friend. In light of the fact that your entire post history on ATS is a list of one line attacks and rantings, I think this qualifies you to being what he refers to as an "Aginer" somebody who is against anything for no apparent reason and no thought given to anything they say. It is no wonder that he hasn't listed you as a friend.



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:17 PM
link   
reply to post by NGC2736
 


No, no, no. My post was in fun. Jest. Attempt at hilarity. Lightening the mood, etc.


Mod Note: One Line / Off Topic Post – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 5-2-2008 by elevatedone]



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:21 PM
link   
reply to post by ItsHumanNature
 



Witty enough to get your temple pounding. I can almost see people pounding at thier keyboards (as has already happened - see your post) in anger that I dare(!!) poke fun at Willie Nelson. For goodness sakes, he smoked pot in the White House, how can you not love a guy like that?

You need to lighten up and take a chill pill. Goodness. You guys are wrapped so tight it's not even funny. You were just waiting to unload.

Unplug, take a breath and relax.

But in all seriousness, before you call me out as a one line wonder, you really need to do just the most basic of queries so as not to prove yourself to be the very thing you just accused me of.


[edit on 5-2-2008 by SlightlyAbovePar]



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:23 PM
link   
I posted twice as way to show the absurdity of using mud as an argument for or against anything.

Don't you find it just a trifle odd how mud is slung before facts even poke their head up?

What, can't deal with facts, either for or against an argument? So the next best thing is to find flaws with people on a personal level? I didn't post to take sides really, though I have my own opinions. I posted to point out how off track this thread went right from the get go.

I have so far not heard one of you discuss what was said on the show. It's your choice, both sides, Deny Ignorance or Show Ignorance.



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:24 PM
link   
reply to post by NGC2736
 


GEEESH! Chill out! The dude cracks a joke you guys get your undies in a bunch!

I'd rather listen to Willie over Rosie O'Donuts anyday.....







Mod Note: One Line / Off Topic Post – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 5-2-2008 by elevatedone]



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:26 PM
link   
Throat, you have the best screen nick ever.

You, sir, are my hero for that!


(I need to get back to my paid disinformation job working for the NSA)


Mod Note: One Line / Off Topic Post – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 5-2-2008 by elevatedone]



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:29 PM
link   

Click here to learn more about this warning.


Sorry eh.




[edit on 5-2-2008 by IvanZana]

[edit on 5-2-2008 by IvanZana]

MOD NOTE - DO NOT EDIT MOD EDITS !

[edit on 5-2-2008 by elevatedone]



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:33 PM
link   
Back On Topic Please.

Stop the one-line off topic posts.


This is your warning.



posted on Feb, 5 2008 @ 03:39 PM
link   
reply to post by NGC2736
 


Okay, if you say so. It seems to me you were about (like another notable poster) to pop an aneurism and are trying to cover yourself.

If you had just slowed down and read the humor, even if you don’t find it funny, I think you might have saved yourself a few blood pressure points.

Just relax guys. Willie is entitled to think any thing he wants. I think he’s an interesting guy and doesn’t do any harm, or benefit, to the truth movement at large.

If he was on my side, I would say the exact same things. It wouldn’t surprise me if resin positively pours out of his sweat ducts. Does that mean I think he is stupid? Nope, not at all. Does that mean I think he shouldn’t have a right to talk, or that his opinion is somehow less valid than others? Of course not, nor did I say so.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join