It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stikkinikki
That 3 fingered hand is actually a three pronged wooden hay fork. I'd venture to day that the UFOs in the plate are actually flowering plants.
sorry
Originally posted by II HAL II
That's the problem with posting here, you make a theory and it gets jumped on like the people have evidence or facts of their own.. when they don't... if you do post it, otherwise its opinion. When it comes to art from a very much unknown civilization any evidence regarding this is opinion anyway as no one can know for sure what they wanted to show.
Originally posted by II HAL II
Sorry for what? in your OPINION its a fork but sadly its not described like that by the 'experts' .... they say hand if you read the link I posted. I'm more inclined to go with them, and they also describe the 'flowers' as stars because they're in the sky.
Originally posted by II HAL II
If I'm going to make a claim, why cant I just say gee this looks like an alien??? its a conspiracy forum and this is related to a well known conspiracy, even if wrong.
Dravidian languages are spoken by more than 200 million people. They appear to be unrelated to languages of other known families like Indo-European, specifically Indo-Aryan, which is the other common language family on the Indian subcontinent. Some linguistic scholars incorporate the Dravidian languages into a larger Elamo-Dravidian language family, which includes the ancient Elamite language (Haltami) of what is now south-western Iran. Dravidian is one of the primary linguistic groups in the proposed Nostratic language system, linking almost all languages in North Africa, Europe and Western Asia into a common family with its origins in the Fertile Crescent sometime between the last Ice Age and the emergence of proto-Indo-European 4-6 thousand years BC.
Dravidian grammatical impact on the structure and syntax of Indo-Aryan languages is considered far greater than the Indo-Aryan grammatical impact on Dravidian. Some linguists explain this anomaly by arguing that Middle Indo-Aryan and New Indo-Aryan were built on a Dravidian substratum.[3]
This geographical and chronological horizon would correspond well with an identification of Proto-Dravidian with the unknown language of the Indus Valley civilization, and the individual groups of Dravidian speakers would have been scattered after its collapse in the early 2nd millennium BC, a fact that receives some support from human genetics: the frequency of Haplogroup L (Y-DNA) in Dravidian upper and middle castes suggests that it may have been (perhaps besides J2) the original Y-haplogroup of the creators of this civilization (Sengupta et al. 2006). Various substratic influence on Vedic Sanskrit ascribed to Dravidian lends further support to this Proto-Dravidian as the IVC language. Asko Parpola has suggested that Meluhha may be the Sumerian rendition of the a native Proto-Dravidian name for the Indus Valley Civilization.
The origins of Indus writing can now be traced to the Ravi Phase (c. 3300-2800 BC) at Harappa. Some inscriptions were made on the bottom of the pottery before firing. Other inscriptions such as this one were made after firing. This inscription (c. 3300 BC) appears to be three plant symbols arranged to appear almost anthropomorphic. The trident looking projections on these symbols seem to set the foundation for later symbols such as those seen in 131.
Originally posted by II HAL II
I didn't change those pictures to look like aliens.... like yours have been, if you look at the first picture of 'Mickey' he doesn't look like an alien???
Originally posted by II HAL II
reply to post by mojo4sale
and the trident picture you show although looks very similar to my one I would say my picture looks more like a hand... in that its not as spread out and in context with a person next to it I'm not 100% convinced but getting there.