Ex-Area 51 Employee - Will answer almost all questions

I'm having a hard time believing this explanation.

a. If this was a test craft for the purpose you are describing, why test it over phoenix??
To create a panic in Phoenix? Doesn't make sence at all.

b. If you really know what you know then you had to be in the closest compartement.
If you were , how the hell did you get out without a bullet or a mysterious death??

c. What can you tell on the triangles?

d. What can you tell on the US Spacefleet?

That's about it for now because i have a feeling i'm wasting my time.

What security measures and devices are in place at Area 51 that we may not know about (i.e. Laser Fields, Infrared, mobile obervation technology etc)?

During your time there did you happen to see/hear anything relating
optical technology that can produce invisibilty?

reply to post by 168.56.255.255

---

Why is this username their IP addy I swear, I thought I just saw a name there.

IP 168.56.255.255 Trace...



Source

www.gsa.gov


Why the IP address instead of a nick?

Ok so the OP was just logged in and left no response. I'm guessing that was the extent of the information he was going to bless us with.
Not looking good.

reply to post by zx4551

---

Hi zx4551,
I find this explanation a bit strange.
The idea that it was to be used to intimidate and distract the enemy during war, above their war zone, is in my opinion a bit naive I suppose, because the bigger the object is and the slower the speed, the easier it is to bring it down with some grenades or rockets or whatever.

And if that’s so, why then, came the Air force with that stupid flare explanation, while they good have done it with the info you give us here?

But the witnesses told, that it was a massive craft, making no sound at all and had a very slow speed.
To propel such an enormous craft with the slow speed it had, you must use some very special soundless propulsion system, if not an anti gravity system, can you explain that a bit to me.


[edit on 4/2/08 by spacevisitor]

Probably a Hoax. I bet he's doing this for the ATS points.....

Lame - Stop Wasting our time

None at all. The higher ups were only allowed to see the aliens, but us lower downs were briefed on the aliens. The reason we weren't allowed to see the aliens was incase someone managed to photograph or video an alien. Evidence of secret aircraft is would cause much less public hysteria than evidence of aliens.



Sure thing! I'll try and post as soon as I can.



I'm glad people are challenging me, I'm all for freedom of opinion.

I'll tell you about 3 of the aliens we were briefed on-

Grays: Yes, the stereotypical alien. They are described as 4 foot tall, chubby (contrary to popular belief), eyes around 10cm in diameter and have a translucent skin. Communicate with telepathy and don't have psychokinetic powers.

Nordics: Described as 8 foot tall, blonde, very intelligent and incredibly strong. They look like humans and can speak English. They are said to be quick to anger.

Reptilians: Described as 7 foot tall, have reptile like scales, don't have tails, can walk on legs and all fours, incredibly intelligent and communicate telepathically. There were rumours with us lower downs that they can travel through different dimensions.

So, there was only a rumour about interdimensional travel which I do not believe personally. We were also not briefed on where exactly where the aliens lived but were told that Grays lived somewhere called "Zeta 2 Reticuli."



I'll consider it.



Will do.



Anti-gravity: We have had moderate success with that. A part of the experimental propulsion for Falcon used anti-gravity.

Dark matter: I don't know the speicifics but this is what they use for anti gravity.

Anti matter: This is quite disturbing. There was though to experiment on making an anti matter bomb. An anti matter bomb would be much, much worse than a hydrogen bomb, around 14 times more powerful. The idea was scrapped as it was too dangerous.

I have seen many, many alien space craft. Sadly, I was only allowed to watch and was not allowed to go inside.



The material used to build Falcon was very, very durable to blunt force, one of the only things that could destroy it was heat. It was proven to be unreliable because the speaker kept failing due to unknown reasons. Falcon was also very vulnreble to missile attacks, the heat from the missiles would have destroyed it easily.

Cloaking devices have been made, but they only work well in low light. The alien craft and some of our own experimental craft use anti-gravity propulsion.



Yes, that was a big problem, and part of the reason why Falcon was destroyed. Bullets would have done nothing, but missiles would have been devestating.



I joined today because I felt that I should finally come out with my story.

I can understand not believing, I'm just asking you to read what I say and to make up your own mind.

Proof would be hard to come by. I don't have any pictures and I wasn't allowed to take any documents out the base.



We were told that contact will be made during the end of this decade if the world continues going into a mess.

There are more good aliens than bad, and the good usually protect us from the bad.



I was able to look at almost all documents and blueprints under guard by higher ups, able to insepct and enter our own craft, and able to look at the outside of alien craft.

This level of clearence was known as "Advanced Level 3", which I do agree sounds pretty funny.



It was proved by some mental health professionals. Ultrasonic sounds can sometimes make peoples think that there is an invisible "presence" and a massive UFO can make people scared. Also, the stress of the battlefield would add to all this.

The speaker kept failing for unknown reasons. It was speculated that altitude may have been a problem.

The craft wouldn't have been too dangerous to people driving. It was just designed to give the edge in battle, not enough to cause people to steer off the road full speed like lunatics.

The interior of ground-level facilities was dissapointingly like any other offices, they didn't keep any secret documents in these facilities either, they were kept underground.



It's very easy for the government to bribe a few journalists and cause a media blackout. The people of Phoenix weren't too intimidated because of the failed speaker and there was no stress of the battlefield.



Sorry, but I have to go. I shall be back to answer more questions soon.

I've known several ex-employees from TTR and Dreamland, both government and contractors, and to a man, they are very reserved and quiet about their former jobs.
The question is what to ask.
What is your general area of expertice---I mean, it would hardly do to ask a security guard advanced technical questions, or a radar operator about aliens underground, or a test pilot questions about the scope of security methods and locations of guards and electronic countermeasures.

So I'll just jump in blindly.
What are the technical specifications of these huge triangles, power source, purpose etc.
You may have been privvy to the torching of one of them, but I have seen a couple of these monsters over the last few years, so they are not all de-commisioned.

reply to post by zx4551

---

thanks, i look forward to what you have to say.

Glad that you replied and answered alot of the questions asked.
Are the aircraft only tested at area 51?
What was your job?
How big is the base underground?
Does S-4 exist.?
Where are they stored?

Just a few questions.

So basically you're saying the project was canned because the speaker failed. Most likely the simplest component of the entire project... lol. I'm more gullible than most here, but that's just ridiculous. I can just see a bunch of scientists and engineers running around scratching their heads... "Someone call Car-Toys and ask 'em about these two wires...".

thanks for responding to our questions

What else do know about the "aliens"

and the whole Reptile thing.....Have you heard of David Icke?


Have you seen the Auroa (sp?)?

Iam happy you spoke up

I just want to know exactly what you mean by this statement in your opening post.





[edit on 4-2-2008 by interestedalways]

Oh good grief! Is everyone just so desperate to believe that reason and common sense jump right out the window? Why get sucked into the unsubstantiated claims of someone obviously seeking attention by spinning a yarn that touches a hot button nerve sure to garner a lot of replies and controversy.

Unless this guy can validate and confirm his credentials, in my opinion, it's all just entertaining conjecture (and part of the fluff you have to wade through around here to find a grain of something that might be true).

Trust me, if I wanted to "get the truth out" but fear retribution or possible legal actions for violating sworn non-disclosure agreements, I wouldn't be dense enough utilize a public forum such as this one as my venue.

I'll file this one under "fun to watch", nothing more.

Just Googled the username - first two hits point to this thread. He's famous already! zx4551, the Secret Service, NSA, FBI, CIA, or Dept. of Homeland Security should be knocking on your door sometime soon.

[edit on 4-2-2008 by EKron]

I was thinking the same thing. I am admittedly very ignorant in this field, and debated with myself for a while before deciding to post a few questions. There are many extremely intelligent people on this board that i'm sure will come up with better ones, but sometimes you have to jump in with both feet and hope you don't make an a** of yourself

Again, I know nothing of military and/or aircraft building (not sure if those are even the right terms), but I'd have to imagine that this project had to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. And to say they scrapped the entire craft and burned it over something so trivial seems a bit shady to me.

After only one test run they deemed the entire craft/project as unreliable? Wouldn't any organization normally have several if not hundreds of test runs tweaking as they went along before totally giving up? Could they not just replace the speaker?



Also, you said:





Again, one would think the military would have done some sort of testing on the materials it was considering for such a large and expensive project. To build an entire aircraft out of material that is vulnerable to heat and missiles seems absurd! Did they not consider this prior to actually building the craft?




The last thing that seems a tad shady to me is when you said:





and:




LMAO...ok, so it would freak out people with MILITARY TRAINING, but, to us 'regular folk' it would do nothing at all. If a humungous spacecraft looking vehicle with bright lights and 160 db loudspeaker flew over top of my car...I'd be in the ditch without a doubt.

I understand that it would be difficult to obtain pictures or paperwork from Area 51, and I wouldn't expect anyone to come by those easily as proof. But, if you at least make the stories sound a bit more plausible, I might be very interested.

Michelle

reply to post by Michelle129

---

I am sure the project would have actually costs hundreds of millions of dollars

I suggest you consider it strongly in the not too distant future. Hoaxes are not looked kindly on here and I can vouch for the authenticity of certain aspects of this if you're forthcoming.

Obfuscation is NOT the way to go though.

I was looking for something more specific such as the decor and layout of the largest mess hall. What color is the water tower? Thanks!