posted on Feb, 4 2008 @ 07:51 PM
Whoever owns them, I have found that they produce much better 'alternate' programs than the other major contender, National Geographic. Has anyone
noticed how NG is biased on EVERYTHING? They don't even produce evidence for whatever they're debunking, they just say 'no, it happened this
way'. The history channel tends to be much more unbiased and their UFO files series is one of the best series on the subject out there, if not the
I don't want to derail, but who owns NG and what, if any, agenda is at work there?