It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Gitmo ruling a setback for Bush administration

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 4 2008 @ 08:47 AM
link   

Gitmo ruling a setback for Bush administration


www.latimes.com

Washington - A federal appeals court refused Friday to reconsider a ruling broadening its own authority to scrutinize evidence against detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

The decision is a setback for the Bush administration, which was displeased by the court's three-judge ruling in July and had urged all 10 judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to review it. The administration said the decision jeopardized national security.

The ruling held that, when Guantanamo Bay detainees bring a court challenge to their status as "enemy combatants," judges must review all the evidence, not just the evidence the military chooses.

After criminal trials, appeals courts are limited in what evidence they can review. But hearings at Guantanamo Bay are not trials. Detainees are not allowed to have attorneys, and the Pentagon decides what evidence to present. And unlike in criminal trials, the government is not obligated to turn over evidence that the defendant might be innocent.

"For this court to ignore that reality would be to proceed as though the Congress envisioned judicial review as a mere charade," Chief Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg wrote Friday.

(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Feb, 4 2008 @ 08:47 AM
link   
This is very good news... the whole notion that somehow we can sieze people and hold them indefinately without the due process of a trial goes against all that this country was built upon... if we are a nation ruled by laws not men, then we need to abide by those laws regardless of whether or not the people we are holding are terrorists or not, guilty or not.

Justice by necessity needs to apply equally to all, not exclude those some administation says it can.

www.latimes.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 4-2-2008 by grover]



new topics
 
1

log in

join