Pentagon: The internet needs to be dealt with as if it were an "enemy weapons system", page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 39 times


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 06:55 AM by spectre76
The internet was technically opened to limited commercial entities in the late 80's and we all, for the most part, hopped on around 1994. It was at this time a whole global transition took place giving birth to e-commerce and since all computer language (HTML included) is written in English, the world started learning English more than ever before. In fact, we were told back then that if we did not learn a foreign language in school that we would have a harder time surviving later in life or be left behind. I'd still recommend learning a foreign language though not by scaring people into it or for inaccurate purposes. It would be interesting to figure out what they were thinking exactly when they plugged us all in... and I don't doubt that we all have some "easier left unsaid" ideas. Was this global shift in commerce planned? What many claim to be "heightened communication" and what seems to be a suddenly smaller globe actually decreased communication but left our focus more on the global and less on our neighborhoods which is why we no longer know our neighbors or get out nearly as much as we used to. Neighborhoods are not what they used to be as we sit in our houses trying to figure the world and its problems out (talking instead of doing) and with this "heightened" and "global" communication we run the risk of finding more ways to come to disagreement or find excuses to go to war. I feel that certain operating systems connected to the internet are essentially broadcasting your movements... think of it as "Windows" into your interests and how your time is spent. Also interesting is the rate of decay on the web and there are certain methods that can be used to determine when something has disappeared organically or intentionally. A LOT disappears and not just over time either. Studying link connectivity (inlinks/outlinks from domains) is also rather interesting... for example, wouldn't you like to know if there are any ".gov" sites pointing to this domain? I'm sure such entities are well aware of our awareness and would hide such data nowadays (robots.txt). While you may consider yourself to be rather "internet savvy", the fact is that we are all somewhat ignorant as your computers are your worst enemies. Consider for a moment your family members use of the web and their level of understanding. This baby didn't come with a government issue handbook as it is sort of being written as it develops. Was all of this change considered prior to turning us on? There is clearly a "global" motivation here. Were we to fully grasp the internet and the extent to which our movement is recorded, we'd most definitely alter our internet behavior immediately and accordingly... or simply unplug. Who's going to do that however? It's like an addiction and yet it can be ripped out from under you in less than a moment. You might think we will be able to protect our last true freedom of expression but consider how well Americans have protected their Constution. This will be no different.
Oh and what was that about IBM and the Third Reich?

[edit on 4-2-2008 by spectre76]


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 07:51 AM by spectre76
Originally posted by Areal51
One of my beliefs is that freedom fighters will always exist and they will always do what's necessary to defend, protect, and if it is ever lost, win back freedom for all. So all the government talk and propaganda about the war on this and the war on that doesn't mean much in the long run to those who would not ever be oppressed. Again, history provides me with all that I need to support my faith in this.

Well but we here in America ARE being oppressed, are we not? The world is witnessing more change in the US than ever before. I'd even say that because we are in it and because of the way our media works we are more ignorant about our "situation" than people from many other countries who can't figure out how the people lost control of their own government and why they are doing NOTHING to get it back. Of course, in order to defend the Constitution (the one duty our president is supposed to uphold under oath) Americans would have to read it and understand it. The same is true for such documents as "The Patriot Act I & II" but were you to ask what these documents really said few would be able to convey them in any sort of detail.
While I don't know how to return to our former glory where we have a government of, for and by the people, I feel we aren't living up to our duties as American citizens either. Instead of doing something, we sit at the computer and share our opinions as if we played no role in any of this and as if our opinions created change. How did those large corporations that people claim run the government get such power and ability to control? I think it might have had something to do with normal people like you and me paying them for their services. We also voluntarily hopped onto the internet and cell phone technologies... though, it is true that we have been enticed into doing so over time as these things become "standards"... you need computer skills to get anywhere these days supposedly, for example. We've all heard that the day will come where physical money is no longer accepted and as always, it will take "regulation" and the promise of "added security" to entice us once again but it will happen. We must accept our roles in the current state of things. It does start with YOU and ME. If you truly want to change the world you should perhaps use all that time forming opinions on the world to instead research which corporations you would like to support and then do so. Might I recommend products from small businesses? They may be more expensive but finances are not the greatest price we will end up paying... and you could consider it an investment in the quality of life in your future. This is no small task but just as we contributed to the rise of these "giant" corporate monopolies we can in time level the playing field and return the power to the people. There is also a noted side-effect of the internet that nobody is talking about... instant gratification. Our social behavior has changed and I'm not so sure it is truly for the better. There are positive and negative aspects but look at what all has occurred since the dawn of the (w)ild (w)ild (w)est. I am only in my early thirties but the "change" I am witnessing cannot be denied and the internet clearly plays a role in that change. The masses watch the propaganda news channels for the latest on Britney (victim of a drug few get to try - no financial limit) more than they ever supported public broadcasting though there is no real publicly funded news station. What's worse is the masses believe what they are told, if not because of their willingness to trust because of the repetition hitting us from all directions. Whatever happened to our color-coded terror alert chart anyway? Have you felt in any way threatened by terrorism and if so are you more afraid of terrorists or your own government and the corporations that are taking more and more control of it in order to fulfill certain global initiatives?


[edit on 4-2-2008 by spectre76]



reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 09:31 AM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by dark_matter06



I am not sure if it was created for that reason, but that is what it has become, regardless of who's side you are on, and who is the worst "BAD" guy, and there are enough of them to go around, from every continent.

The internet is a highway full of deceit and the next pathway to destruction.

If you focus on just one group of players you are turning a blindeye to a million more with the ways and means to pass lies in order to fool the gullible,

Watch out, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend," crowd, you may cut off your nose to spite your own face.


Internet problems continue with fourth cable break
www.arabianbusiness.com...


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 11:06 AM by geocom
reply to post by neo2012



Well nowadays the internet may not be a room at the pentagon but while it was once upon a time what we use as the internet today started out as Arpa net and was a DOD funded project. The first message sent on great grandad of the internet was sent at 10:30 at night on October 29 1969..

In 1972 the Arpanet had a total of 37 networked computers
in 1977 the first TCP (transmission control protocol) messages were sent
from 1970 to 1992 SRI international was the first and only domain name registrar for the arpanet and internet
in 1983 the Arpanet was opened to universities and some scientific organizations this small network grew into what you use today..

have a good read about it at the link below
www.computerhistory.org...

Respectfully
GEO


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 11:28 AM by neo2012
reply to post by geocom



I know that the military were the first to implement this system but only because they had the money to build computers in the first place. As home computers got more advanced the civilian population i,m sure would of made there own internet.

Cheers for the link, very interesting.

[edit on 4-2-2008 by neo2012]


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 11:39 AM by IMAdamnALIEN
reply to post by Johnmike



You may need to read up on those events as most of the information leads you to yet another "False Flag" operation. Im not saying it didnt happen, I AM saying that the US government LET IT HAPPEN!!!!!


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 11:50 AM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by neo2012




Some interesting info neo. TY



reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 12:08 PM by kattraxx
Another good thread, OP. Flagged.

Just as a related aside, the following was printed in an FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force bulletin regarding the definition of a "homegrown terrorist". You have to scroll down to The Definition of Domestic Terrorism.

The brochure starts out with "If you encounter any of the following, call the Joint Terrorism Task Force." The brochure then proceeds to set forth certain things that the law enforcement officers need to look for. They include ...

Someone who defends the U.S. Constitution against the federal government and the United Nations
Someone who asks the law enforcement officer to cite his authority for making a stop
Someone who makes numerous references to the U.S. Constitution
Someone who says that driving is a "right," and not a "privilege"
Someone who attempts to "police the police"


archive.newsmax.com...


This pervasive, incremental chipping away of our constitutional rights on all fronts is relentless.

Now, I suppose if you quote the Constitution of the United States too many times on the Internet, you will be defined as a domestic terrorist.

The Internet threatens them because with it, we can get around the MSM propaganda by communicating with each other around the world and connecting the dots ourselves. When you can communicate with people local to a news report, you can get the truth right from the horse's mouth, so to speak, and completely circumvent the MSM spin and propaganda. And there is the rub for them.

If we're not afraid, we're not paying attention.

edit to add url


[edit on 2/4/08 by kattraxx]


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 01:33 PM by Areal51
reply to post by spectre76



You've made some good point. I agree with you that we are being oppressed. Much of it our own individual doing. However, my point was not that oppression didn't matter, it was that propaganda designed to support the continuation or the implementation of oppressive policies didn't matter much in the long run to those who wouldn't be oppressed. The thing is that there are people who have the education, means, and opportunity to fight oppression that are in fact doing so. There are wealthy and capable individuals who have devoted their entire lives to combating oppression. There are plenty individuals and non-profit organizations that are involved in that fight. They are the ones doing most of the legwork that the rest of us take for granted. There are independent and credible journalists who are also involved. So, to make it more clear, it is the awareness of these current facts and history that support the faith that I have. Oppressive regimes are never entirely eliminated, this is what history teaches. At the same time there have been individuals and organizations that possessed the courage to do what was right and in the best interests of all people.

It would be great if every person could help herself or himself, but the reality is that it generally only takes a dedicated few to get the ball rolling to the point where more individual can step in and join the fight. Unions are a great example of this. They are organized and it generally are the leaders who take the initial steps to protect and acquire what's fair for those who are members of that union. After a point which all members may participate in dealing a blow to the oppressor. The United States is supposed to function the same way, and I believe that it does. It's just not always so clear to those of us who are not in a position to have the best possible view of what's going on. By definition, the intimate details are initially only known to a select few. However, those who are in a position to let us know what are options are, will let us know just that -- when the time is right. At least that's what I believe.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 122 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 67 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 17 hours ago, 43 replies
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 36 replies