80% Efficient Solar Panel?! Works at Night?!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 17 times
Topic started on 2-2-2008 @ 02:41 AM by biggie smalls

80% Efficient Solar Panel?! Works at Night?!


www.ecogeek.org
The most expensive, carefully designed, and complicated solar panels in the world operate at about 40% efficiency. That means that, for every bit of sunlight that hits the panel, only 40% of it is turned into electricity.

Steven Novack of the Idaho National Laboratories came up with an inexpensive, foldable solar panel that may turn out to be up to 80% efficient.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.inl.gov
www.groovygreen.com


reply posted on 2-2-2008 @ 02:41 AM by biggie smalls
This is incredible!

There was a news story about solar power being integrated into paint so your whole house would be covered in solar panels. The efficiency wasn't very high, but the technology was pretty similar (nanotech that is). I imagine production fell through the cracks of the patent office or an oil corporation bought the technology...

The trick is nanotechnology. The surface of the material is printed with miniscule nano-antennae that capture infra-red radiation, the kind that the sun puts out in abundance, and is even available at night. Television antennas absorbe large wavelength energy, so in order to absorb ultra-small wavelength energy (photons) they had to create ultra-small antennas.


Sounds great right? Oh wait, there's a problem...

There's currently no way to capture the energy being created.
So while there are electrons pouring out of the nano-antennas when exposed to the sun, there is no way to capture those electrons. But don't worry, those geniuses in Idaho are working on that already. By putting a tiny capacitor, or AC/DC converter in the center of every tiny tiny antenna, they think they could make this new kind of solar panel export all that energy it's created without raising the price, or lowering the efficiency too much.


Let's hope they start marketing this kind of material fast. We're pretty much addicted to coal and oil, and the solution so far has been to use radioactive material for nuclear power...Which is one of the dumbest ideas yet.

Here's a picture of the panel:



The article is from the 30th of January, but I figured this is still pretty breaking news, right?


And another picture:



An array of nanoantennas, printed in gold and imaged with a scanning electron microscope. The deposited wire is roughly a thousand atoms thick. A flexible panel of interconnected nanoantennas may one day replace heavy, expensive solar panels.


www.ecogeek.org
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 2/2/2008 by biggie smalls]

[edit on 2/2/2008 by biggie smalls]


reply posted on 2-2-2008 @ 02:58 AM by biggie smalls
reply to post by biggie smalls



This is the sort of technology that needs serious R&D, not 'clean' coal and nuclear power.

We are moving in the wrong direction when we are still taking mineral deposits from the Earth (ie coal, oil, nuclear).

Renewable energy is the way to go and I believe a combination of wind, solar, and possibly hydro if used on a small scale will cover our needs many times over.

By simply placing the state of South Dakota with a few thousand wind turbines we'd be able to supply the whole country's power needs. If we spread the wind turbines out across the country and combine their use with solar power, we're set.

This creates many new jobs in the process, and new businesses will startup to produce the materials necessary for building all the new plants.

The problem with any new technology is that plastic is involved (a derivative of oil, a fossil fuel). There are plants that can be used instead of plastic such as industrial hemp which replaces the need for oil at all.

The first car bodies were made out of hemp before metal replaced their use in case anyone was wondering about the strength of the material.



reply posted on 2-2-2008 @ 06:35 PM by V Kaminski
After the big spike in gallium arsenides... well, this is very good news. Maybe one day the process can be worked into sail cloth. It would help with flexibility and reserve battery stores onboard for sure. Sails only last a couple years even with care... maybe in a couple years. The process sounds very straightforward. Twice as efficient... and they absorb Ir... and at night!

If the process turns out to be sound the Europeans will jump on it large. Lotsa neat solar and other green systems in Europe where the tech has a higher social priority than in North America where how much energy one burns almost appears as a status symbol or something... it's slowly changing and people are becoming more aware of the need for alternatives to current practices. Some has been done well so far... some seems an exercise in "pseudo-green." As long as folks are aware thats all it should take... or so one might reasonably think. LOL. Not easily.

Hmmm. They say the anntenna print is "doped" with exotic chemicals which may or may not help "green" speaking but then again they don't say. That it's high frequency AC might mean some radio-interference troubles and conversion for storage batteries. It sounds really, really like a step in the right direction for sure.

It will be interesting to see if they can get the capacitors as part of the print for the nano-antennae to actually cap the electrons... if they can? Kotter and Novack at INL will be seen as real leaders globally. If it's "green" and it really works might be the only two qualifiers outside the price.

At double current efficiences? Cool. Nano-everything is really exciting.
Microcontinuum Inc could get hot. It appears they are in the tape/data biz and thin film coatings. Appears private at this point... out of MA.

Cool bigs', if you hadn' t of bumped it I would have missed it.

Vic

[edit on 2-2-2008 by V Kaminski]


reply posted on 2-2-2008 @ 11:37 PM by biggie smalls
reply to post by mybigunit



Great point on the UPS/FEDEX workers.

The majority of our waste comes from industry, plain and simple. Transportation is second...And then comes personal energy use.

Solar power could offset pretty much all of the industrial, commercial, and residential uses.

However, transportation would still be an issue. Bush seems to think hydrogen powered cars is the way to go, but that's just another band-aid on a huge problem. We use hydrogen for our rockets, but the combustibility of the hydrogen atom is pretty freaking high...Moreso than petroleum.

Personal transportation needs to go the biodiesel or biofuel route. I am not pro-ethanol by any means though. I think corn is a terrible solution to biofuel. Hemp, switchgrass, and algae happen to be much more efficient and they're not the same staple food crop as corn.

We need to come together as a species and figure out how to properly behave and stop letting the politicians decide for us.

They've been doing a terrible job so far, why give them the benefit of the doubt for the future?

The time for change is NOW. Not yesterday, not tomorrow, now.



reply posted on 3-2-2008 @ 12:22 AM by coven
Kaku (website) has already stated that if we could hit 70% efficiency that the world would be able to afford continued use of Solar Panels, and quickly convert from Coal, Petroleum, and Nuclear power stations.

Just imagine. 5 years from now... you go outside. get on your roof... throw a few of these plastic sheets (basically all these are... major size improvement on the original concept) down; wire 'em up... and throw your Electric Companies Breakers. then they have to pay US money for supplying power to their grid.


NICE!

Coven


reply posted on 3-2-2008 @ 12:30 AM by biggie smalls
reply to post by coven



The corn-ethanol route is not the best case scenario. If we as a country have so much excess corn, we should be exporting it to people that need it (for free).

If there really is tons and tons of extra food lying around and we're not using it, that's a huge problem...And a waste.

There's starving people around the world that we could be feeding with corn instead of burning it in our cars. Its unnecessary IMHO.


reply posted on 3-2-2008 @ 05:59 AM by SantaClaus
The government will provide the red tape where needed.

For example, starting a cab company here in AZ is more difficult than almost any place.. Why? Because the state depends on DUI's for financial sustenance. Cab companies are checked regularly for illegal alien employees, driving records and BBB guidelines. No other business is so thoroughly harassed by the gov't. They even have made it a law that a police officer may infer how drunk a driver is no matter what their bac and prosecute them such. Its a stream of income for the state and the police force. They make a profit of it.

So if you're talking a large movement in solar (which, by the way, I completely agree with all of your posts), you're going to have to get through the red tape. Somehow, they'll find that solar panels cause cancer in homeowners and that more panel installers die by falling than the average construction worker (higher insurance?). Who knows, people are silly enough to believe claims that the "nanotech" can breach the confines of the cell and infect you with a NanoSTD.

My point: They will make a big deal out of anything they are not a part of. They own the oil industry at this point. That's why its even a factor. If the taxes are not high, and the profit margins for the interest groups aren't enough, there will be a mass-scale fight against it, and it might never be seen. They will quiet such news.

There IS a water-powered car. Its been running, I saw it. Why is the inventor dead and the patent owned by the military but has never been released??

So basically, is solar the most unavoidable success the energy industry has ever seen? If not, the MSM and our overlords will get involved and squelch it.

Please, I am being the devil's advocate. Offer arguments, it would make me hopeful.

[edit on 2/3/08 by SantaClaus]


reply posted on 3-2-2008 @ 09:51 AM by Animal
Originally posted by Thain Esh Kelch
There are just 2 problems with this technology:
• It captures infrared light, meaning that the energy input isnt nowhere near as high as sunlight; ie. need to capture more to make the same energyoutput as sunlight based.


I think based on the fact that they say the technology is offering 80% gain means that they have overcome this hurdle.


• The frequency at which the energy is captured at, is at this point the largest problem. Converting it to 50/60 Hz which we can use for anything, is well, quite a hurdle..


ALL solar panels have to have the electricity transformed to be used,this is not a new feature. Check out this article from "Home Power Magazine":
"Solar Systems Simplified by Scott Russel
Notice #8 in the system, "the inverter". This is the device that changes the type of current produced by the PV panels to usable electricity. I have to admit I find electricity to be a bit confusing so if this is a not an answer the the issue you raise please excuse my ignorance. If it does, your welcome.

Regardless it is a cool article and is a great introductory to how a "off the grid" solar system is built.


But hey, new technology is always welcome. I've always wondered why IR wasn't exploited more! And this is apparently a very cheap to produce technology..


I think it is safe to say those with bundles of cash whose income / interests would be damaged by the development of alternative energy sources has A LOT to do wit the lacking research.


[edit on 3-2-2008 by Animal]


reply posted on 3-2-2008 @ 12:14 PM by kattraxx
Biggie, great stuff.

I've been following this nano-tech/solar company in Palo Alto, CA ever since I heard them on Coast to Coast some years ago. (Nano-Solar)

www.nanosolar.com...

I believe they are having some success with these technologies and have gone to market already on some of them.

Check out their "light-weight solar-electric cell foil under Products.


reply posted on 3-2-2008 @ 01:01 PM by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by coven
I personally would love nothing more than for Ethanol to be the replacement. If I wanna eat an ear of corn I still can... But maybe then we could finally have a Naturally sweetened beverage (i.e. sodas)



Corn syrup isn't natural?

www.corn.org...

Corn oil unhealthy?

Not according to this.

It's probably best to not use much oil in cooking, but corn oil is not the worst of choices.

www.reuters.com...

I have nothing against ethanol as a source of fuel, but the ripple effect throughout the economy might make things worse, not better.

/2ludpg



[edit on 2008/2/3 by GradyPhilpott]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Freak interstate "Accident" in FL
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
The Man Who Will Fall to Earth; Parachuting From Space
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
Aussie guy gets stuck by lightning while filming electrical storm
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
HMS Victory 1737 is to be raised from the sea, possible treasure!
  Posted 15 days ago with 3 member flags
Rockclimbers would you take your 2 year old baby with you?
  Posted 2 days ago with 2 member flags
Dog attacks young six year old girl and tore off her ear
  Posted 18 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 10 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 6 hours ago, 49 replies