It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The next US president is selected!

page: 5
4
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 2 2008 @ 04:00 PM
link   
The point is, folks, IT DOESN'T MATTER which of them get elected. Jackinthebox said it, there IS NO liberal or conservative. Those are only terms coined by the MSM to make you think that you have a choice.

There are only NWO and non-NWO candidates, and the NWO has made sure that since 1988, NO ONE ran for president, unless they were "with the program".
Obama-CFR,Bilderberg
Billary-CFR, Bilderberg
McCain-CFR, Bilderberg

Moe, Larry and Curley -all the same, all a joke, but unlike Moe, Larry and Curley, all very DANGEROUS.




posted on Mar, 2 2008 @ 05:03 PM
link   
Well, I know nothing about American politics, but I think that Obama will be President, briefly, Billary will be Vice president, briefly, then she will be President.

Came to me in a vision.

Heaven help America,

Horsegiver.



posted on Mar, 2 2008 @ 06:19 PM
link   
reply to post by horsegiver
 

Thanks for the cheery news! UGH!
LOL!



posted on Mar, 3 2008 @ 09:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
The point is, folks, IT DOESN'T MATTER which of them get elected. Jackinthebox said it, there IS NO liberal or conservative. Those are only terms coined by the MSM to make you think that you have a choice.

There are only NWO and non-NWO candidates, and the NWO has made sure that since 1988, NO ONE ran for president, unless they were "with the program".
Obama-CFR,Bilderberg
Billary-CFR, Bilderberg
McCain-CFR, Bilderberg

Moe, Larry and Curley -all the same, all a joke, but unlike Moe, Larry and Curley, all very DANGEROUS.


So you think that ideologically speaking, there'd be no difference in the agenda/policies that McCain would have, and the ones Hillary/Obama would have? Conservatism and Liberalism was around long before the MSM. I haven't heard any of them pushing a one world government as one of their platform issues. If anything, the USA has been going against the grain, rather than what many nations would prefer we do. If I saw the US continually caving in to the will of the UN, etc.. I might suspect something.



posted on Mar, 4 2008 @ 12:56 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueRaja
 




So you think that ideologically speaking, there'd be no difference in the agenda/policies that McCain would have, and the ones Hillary/Obama would have? Conservatism and Liberalism was around long before the MSM. I haven't heard any of them pushing a one world government as one of their platform issues. If anything, the USA has been going against the grain, rather than what many nations would prefer we do. If I saw the US continually caving in to the will of the UN, etc.. I might suspect something.


Please allow me to interject.

My answer would be "no." There would be little to no substantive policy differences regardless of which candidate got into office. The only difference would be what was highlighted, and what was spun. Take illegal immigration for example. The Republicans aren't doing anything about it, and don't even claim to be hamstrung by the Democrats on the issue. That's because both sides are pushing for the NAU. Wether we like it or not, it's going to happen no matter who is in office.

The candidates have nothing to do with being Conservative or Liberal, any more than Adolf Hitler was a Socialist. The MSM has nothing to do with it, other than being the tool that gives the appearance that the candidates adhere to such values.

They're not going to tell you that they're about to sell out the United States of America for profit. But what exactly do you think NAFTA is?

I really don't know where people come up with the UN being the headquarters of the NWO. I think it's just a distraction at the moment. Just another tool for the architechts of the NWO.



posted on Mar, 4 2008 @ 01:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by scientist
all the elitist fingers point towards Hilary.


Of COURSE they do, but just in case media throws ridicules at the US government for plotting the presedential election, they have Barak as their backup and if they don't already THEY'LL FORCE HIM!

We have too pray everyone. Right now.

We have too pray whatever god or religion we believe.

We have too pray for intervention, because it's gonna take a whole lot of death and bloodshed too stop this NWO or forces from a divine nature.



posted on Mar, 13 2008 @ 10:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by ChocoTaco369

Originally posted by xSMOKING_GUNx
Now some of you will remember reading or researching the fact that all previous presidents have been born, bred and selected by the so called 'new world order'

So George Washington was "born, bred and selected" by the New World Order?


I doubt this is a fact. I can't see Billary winning the presidency FWIW.


Maybe "born, bred and selected" is a bold term but I don't see why not, there is a lot more to this election process than we are led to believe.


Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by AWingAndASigh
 



McCain was selected to lead the Republicans because he is beatable. Hillary has already been selected by the Bilderbergs and endorsed by the Rothschilds to be the next President of the United States, and most likely the North American Union.


It is the way you unravel the twisted web that will allow you to see the real scale of power held in America.

Jackinthebox, it seems, is well versed in thinking outside his box, although I cannot come across as positive in my candidate selection, it is the decision to look beyond what the media is feeding us and respect the judgement we are ourselves born with.

There is a 'script' whether written or unwritten for the forthcoming change of power, we should be reading the last page.

It matters not how we vote because the people in the shadows that have been running our countries and controlling our people and economy will continue to do so with there new puppet.

Regards S_G



posted on May, 30 2008 @ 12:50 AM
link   
reply to post by fooffstarr
 


there is truth to whatyou are saying. At what point did the american people get so soft and weak? I seem to remember from 3rd grade history that "our american government was made FOR THE PEOPLE-BY THE PEOPLE". Our founding fathers must be rolling in their graves right now. We have become so foolish to believe that the patriotic act passed and enacted all in the belief to prevent terrorism. P-a-a-leeze!!!!! when really it was a way to relieve us of our basic constitutional right to bear arms. Notice how this was passed through and voted on by congress without our knowing and without the american peoples vote? How many more "rights" will be relinquished without our knowing? We should have already had a civil war and put a stop to all this nonsense long before 9/11.But instead we say "let our government take care of it". Wake up Americans!! Our fellow soldiers have fought and died for our precious freedoms. Are we just going to sit back and let that go in vain????We really need to get back to basics. What's right is right and what's wrong is wrong. I feel we have been decieved and lied to and have been demoralized and deamericanized . we have lost our faith in the leaderships of this country. I feel we need to take a stand and let them know--- we want America back!!!I fear for the upcooming generation. Thank you.



posted on Nov, 5 2008 @ 01:21 AM
link   




top topics



 
4
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join