ya this is like 6 months old why is this being rehashed and if this is the firs ttime you heard of this perhaps u need another news source clearly its outdated

why he even mentions the name Bin Laden as he knows exactly that his family got 200 000 000 000 $ invested in the US via Bush family!?? I have to agree with David Icke - "presidents are not elected, are selected" .

A stupid joke from the army :

An army officer comes to the soldiers , telling them

Officer:" guys, i got bad news and good news for today. How shall i start?"
The soldieres responded " start with the bad news, at least we end up with the good one"
Officer : " ok, the bad news are that for today , we have S**T to eat for our meal"
soldiers : very sad.. ok .. and what is the good news??
Officer : " the good news is .. we got 2 meals available for each of us!"


All the times when i think about the elections , this stupid joke comes to my head...

[edit on 1-2-2008 by sty]

He sounds very uncovincing in his voice. Almost like he doesn't care that we know it was an inside job.

watchZEITGEISTnow

Hmm... of 19 hijackers of which 5 at least are alive? Is he ignorant or a liar?

"it was an Osama Bin Laden job with 19 people from Saudi Arabia"

So, how come they're not attacking Saudi Arabia then?

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott

Responsible posters provide links to similar events to provide a context for current events.

Read!

It makes bulletin boards that much more fun and informative.

I like what you did there, replied to a condescending, patronizing tone in another condescending and patronizing tone. Well played, sir.

as for the topic, hasn't Clinton's credit already been ruined by... say.. lying under oath about something trivial? So why believe him about anything more important than a BJ?

Breaking News is a different forum so both can coexist.

It makes me feel good that even Clinton gets hell from the fringe when he speaks the truth.

Originally posted by scientist

I like what you did there, replied to a condescending, patronizing tone in another condescending and patronizing tone. Well played, sir.

Which was followed up by the condescending, patronizing tone of your post.

Extraordinary.

And I agree that Clinton should have no credibility, but he's a wildly popular guy with the Democrats.

Of course, having been having been caught in one lie doesn't mean that he'll never tell the truth again.

But, it must mean something that even Clinton wouldn't try to pass such idiotic notions off on the public.

It is my opinion though, that Clinton's health isn't that good and he's having problems being the incredibly suave individual he was before Monica, the impeachment and the bypass surgery.

I don't think Bill would live through another four years in the White House, not that that is of concern to the national interest.

I like good ole' bill bascially because he was such a great speaker.

I take what "invested" politicians say with a grain of salt.

I don't know what happenned on 9/11.

I do know that if for some reason the world is a lot more corrupt and complicated then is presented in the major media, and that the delicate topic of possibly sacrificing lives as means toward some type of end for political reasons (not just troops sacrificed but a few thousand citizens)is so potentially distabalizing , that the amount of disorder that would result from anything but denials denails denials would likely take society down.

and that most people IF IF IF something likes this took place would not know how to deal with the possibility that intelligence agency's determined that a "new pearl harbor" was necessary to give america the opportunity to assert herself abroad. They would initially feel scared so instead the easiest mental path for them to take would be deny deny deny believing (not that it happened) but that it's a possibility.

Note i have no certain idea what happened but not willing to look at all sides in a unbiased way (that they could stand to believe) would cripple any honest examination from the get go, no?

Whatever clinton say's i think should be taken with a grain of salt. Especially because as a politican w/ a wife running for office he has no choice to say anything else (without polical sucide for his wife)and himself. A former italian president said "everyone in intelligence circles knows it's an inside job", or something along those lines, so you gotta look to see what are the motives for such speeches. If there is not any ill will against America? or the group of intelligency agency's mentioned that are "in on it"? and if you already made up your mind, you may dismiss this italian guy's comments in any way you are willing to allow your mind to rationalize them, also if you made up your mind that it was a inside job, this solidfy's things in your mind, i think instead it should be looked at a a solid piece of evidence in the latter's camp, but not as a certainty.

[edit on 3-2-2008 by cpdaman]

I am a huge fan of Bill Clinton. My respect for him has increased since doing this. I don't like hecklers, very annoying people.

This reminds me of the Bill Maher show in which Bill personally throw out the 9/11 hecklers from the audience.

Ok, so that's the story the Matrix wants you to beleive, and we must beleive it.

I'd like to be a fly on the wall in the Clinton household. Wouldnt you?

That's the story and we're sticking with it. to say otherwise would be political suicide.

What do you expect him to tell the masses? Please tell me.

The truth?

How can the truth be divulged at this time? I also am a big fan of Bill and

he is just playing a game he simply has to play if he wants any part of

politics. So is his wife.

[edit on 3-2-2008 by dgtempe]